scholarly journals Association of Heart Failure With Outcomes Among Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease: Insights From EUCLID

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc D. Samsky ◽  
Anne Hellkamp ◽  
William R. Hiatt ◽  
F. Gerry R. Fowkes ◽  
Iris Baumgartner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Heart Failure ◽  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Peripheral Artery Disease ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Peripheral Artery ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Artery Disease

Background Peripheral artery disease (PAD) and heart failure (HF) are each independently associated with poor outcomes. Risk factors associated with new‐onset HF in patients with primary PAD are unknown. Furthermore, how the presence of HF is associated with outcomes in patients with PAD is unknown. Methods and Results This analysis examined risk relationships of HF on outcomes in patients with symptomatic PAD randomized to ticagrelor or clopidogrel as part of the EUCLID (Examining Use of Ticagrelor in Peripheral Arterial Disease) trial. Patients were stratified based on presence of HF at enrollment. Cox models were used to determine the association of HF with outcomes. A separate Cox model was used to identify risk factors associated with development of HF during follow‐up. Patients with PAD and HF had over twice the rate of concomitant coronary artery disease as those without HF. Patients with PAD and HF had significantly increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (hazard ratio [HR], 1.31; 95% CI, 1.13–1.51) and all‐cause mortality (HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.19–1.63). In patients with PAD, the presence of HF was associated with significantly less bleeding (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.45–0.96). Characteristics associated with HF development included age ≥66 (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.18–1.40 per 5 years), diabetes mellitus (HR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.41–2.43), and weight (bidirectionally associated, ≥76 kg, HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.64–0.93; <76 kg, HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.07–1.16). Conclusions Patients with PAD and HF have a high rate of coronary artery disease with a high risk for major adverse cardiovascular events and death. These data support the possible need for aggressive treatment of (recurrent) atherosclerotic disease in PAD, especially patients with HF.

Effect of vorapaxar on cardiovascular and limb outcomes in patients with peripheral artery disease with and without coronary artery disease: Analysis from the TRA 2°P-TIMI 50 trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 124-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arman Qamar ◽  
David A Morrow ◽  
Mark A Creager ◽  
Benjamin M Scirica ◽  
Jeffrey W Olin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Peripheral Artery Disease ◽  
Absolute Risk ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Number Needed To Treat ◽  
Peripheral Artery ◽  
Artery Disease ◽  
Lower Extremity Revascularization

Intensive antithrombotic therapy reduces major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and major adverse limb events (MALE) in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). Recent studies have suggested heterogeneity in risk and benefit in those with and without concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) and peripheral revascularization. We evaluated the risk of MACE and MALE in patients with PAD stratified by history of concomitant CAD and prior peripheral revascularization and whether the efficacy and safety of vorapaxar were similar in these subgroups. The TRA 2°P-TIMI 50 trial randomized 26,449 patients with prior MI, ischemic stroke, or PAD to vorapaxar or placebo. This analysis examined the effect of vorapaxar in a broad population of 6136 patients with PAD. Overall, vorapaxar significantly reduced MACE (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.73, 0.99; p = 0.034) and MALE (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.53, 0.92; p = 0.011) in patients with PAD. The absolute risk reduction (ARR) for MACE was greater in patients with PAD and CAD versus those with PAD alone (–2.2% vs 0.1%: number needed to treat (NNT) 45 vs 1000). Conversely, the ARR for MALE was higher in those with prior lower extremity revascularization (2.5% vs 0.2%: NNT 40 vs 500). Vorapaxar increased major bleeding (HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.12, 1.71; p = 0.003). The net clinical outcome in all patients with PAD was reduced with vorapaxar (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.72, 0.94; p = 0.004), with benefits driven by reductions in MACE for those with CAD and by reductions in MALE for those with prior peripheral revascularization. Among patients with PAD, vorapaxar resulted in a net clinical benefit; however, the drivers of benefit were heterogeneous, with greater reductions in MACE in those with concomitant CAD and greater reductions in MALE in those with prior lower extremity revascularization, and unclear benefit in patients with neither. These clinical characteristics may be useful in identifying the subgroups of patients with PAD most likely to benefit from potent antithrombotic therapies. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00526474

scholarly journals Type 2 diabetes and risk of major cardiovascular events in peripheral artery disease versus coronary artery disease patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
C H Saely ◽  
A Vonbank ◽  
B Larcher ◽  
A Mader ◽  
M Maechler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Peripheral Artery Disease ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Peripheral Artery ◽  
Major Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Multivariate Adjustment ◽  
Artery Disease

Abstract   The prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is higher in peripheral artery disease (PAD) than in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients, and PAD overall confers higher cardiovascular risk than CAD. The purpose of this study was to investigate how the incidence of major cardiovascular events compares between PAD and CAD patients when analyses are stratified by the presence of type 2 diabetes (T2DM). We prospectively recorded major cardiovascular events and death over 10.0±4.7 years in 923 patients with stable CAD, of whom 26.7% had T2DM and in 292 patients with PAD, of whom 42.1% had T2DM. Four groups were analyzed: CAD patients without diabetes (CAD/T2DM-; n=677), CAD patients with T2DM (CAD/T2DM+; n=246), PAD patients without diabetes (PAD/T2DM-; n=169) and PAD patients with T2DM (PAD/T2DM+; n=123). When compared to the incidence of MACE in CAD+/T2DM- patients (25.1%), it was significantly higher in CAD+/T2DM+ patients (35.4%; p&lt;0.001), in PAD+/T2DM- patients (30.2%; p=0.022) and in PAD+/T2DM+ patients (47.2%; p&lt;0.001). Patients with both PAD and T2DM in turn were at a higher risk than CAD+/T2DM+ or PAD+/T2DM- patients (p=0.001 and p&lt;0.001, respectively). The incidence of MACE did not differ significantly between PAD+/T2DM- and CAD+/T2DM+ patients (p=0.413). Compared to patients with CAD, Cox regression analyses after multivariate adjustment showed an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.46 [1.14–1.87], p=0.002 for the presence of PAD. Conversely, T2DM increased the risk of MACE after multivariate adjustment in CAD and PAD patients (adjusted HR 1.58 [1.27–1.98], p&lt;0.001). In conclusion, our data show that T2DM and the presence of PAD are mutually independent predictors of MACE. Patients with both PAD and T2DM are at an exceedingly high risk of MACE. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

2222-PUB: Type 2 Diabetes as a Predictor of Cardiovascular Events in Peripheral Artery Disease vs. Coronary Artery Disease

Diabetes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2222-PUB
Author(s):  
CHRISTOPH H. SAELY ◽  
ALEXANDER VONBANK ◽  
CHRISTINE HEINZLE ◽  
DANIELA ZANOLIN-PURIN ◽  
BARBARA LARCHER ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Peripheral Artery Disease ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Peripheral Artery ◽  
Artery Disease
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document