scholarly journals Timing of Prehospital Advanced Airway Management for Adult Patients With Out‐of‐Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Japan

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masashi Okubo ◽  
Sho Komukai ◽  
Junichi Izawa ◽  
Koichiro Gibo ◽  
Kosuke Kiyohara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Airway Management ◽  
Emergency Medical Services ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Medical Services ◽  
Emergency Medical ◽  
Advanced Airway ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Risk Ratios

Background The timing of advanced airway management (AAM) on patient outcomes after out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest has not been fully investigated. We evaluated the association between the timing of prehospital AAM and 1‐month survival. Methods and Results We conducted a secondary analysis of a prospective, nationwide, population‐based out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest registry in Japan. We included emergency medical services–treated adult (≥18 years) out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrests from 2014 through 2017, stratified into initial shockable or nonshockable rhythms. Patients who received AAM at any minute after emergency medical services–initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation underwent risk‐set matching with patients who were at risk of receiving AAM within the same minute using time‐dependent propensity scores. Eleven thousand three hundred six patients with AAM in shockable and 163 796 with AAM in nonshockable cohorts, respectively, underwent risk‐set matching. For shockable rhythms, the risk ratios (95% CIs) of AAM on 1‐month survival were 1.01 (0.89–1.15) between 0 and 5 minutes, 1.06 (0.98–1.15) between 5 and 10 minutes, 0.99 (0.87–1.12) between 10 and 15 minutes, 0.74 (0.59–0.92) between 15 and 20 minutes, 0.61 (0.37–1.00) between 20 and 25 minutes, and 0.73 (0.26–2.07) between 25 and 30 minutes after emergency medical services–initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation. For nonshockable rhythms, the risk ratios of AAM were 1.12 (1.00–1.27) between 0 and 5 minutes, 1.34 (1.25–1.44) between 5 and 10 minutes, 1.39 (1.26–1.54) between 10 and 15 minutes, 1.20 (0.99–1.45) between 15 and 20 minutes, 1.18 (0.80–1.73) between 20 and 25 minutes, 0.63 (0.29–1.38) between 25 and 30 minutes, and 0.44 (0.11–1.69) after 30 minutes. Conclusions In this observational study, the timing of AAM was not statistically associated with improved 1‐month survival for shockable rhythms, but AAM within 15 minutes after emergency medical services–initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation was associated with improved 1‐month survival for nonshockable rhythms.

scholarly journals Management of EMS on-scene time during advanced life support in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a retrospective observational trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. S82-S89
Author(s):  
Michael Poppe ◽  
Mario Krammel ◽  
Christian Clodi ◽  
Christoph Schriefl ◽  
Alexandra-Maria Warenits ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Emergency Medical Services ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Advanced Life Support ◽  
Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
Medical Services ◽  
Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Emergency Medical ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Objective Most western emergency medical services provide advanced life support in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest aiming for a return of spontaneous circulation at the scene. Little attention is given to prehospital time management in the case of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with regard to early coronary angiography or to the start of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation treatment within 60 minutes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest onset. We investigated the emergency medical services on-scene time, defined as emergency medical services arrival at the scene until departure to the hospital, and its association with 30-day survival with favourable neurological outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Methods All patients of over 18 years of age with non-traumatic, non-emergency medical services witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest between July 2013 and August 2015 from the Vienna Cardiac Arrest Registry were included in this retrospective observational study. Results Out of 2149 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients, a total of 1687 (79%) patients were eligible for analyses. These patients were stratified into groups according to the on-scene time (<35 minutes, 35–45 minutes, 45–60 minutes, >60 minutes). Within short on-scene time groups, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest occurred more often in public and bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation was more common (both P<0.001). Patients who did not achieve return of spontaneous circulation at the scene showed higher rates of 30-day survival with favourable neurological outcome with an on-scene time of less than 35 minutes (adjusted odds ratio 5.00, 95% confidence interval 1.39–17.96). Conclusion An emergency medical services on-scene time of less than 35 minutes was associated with higher rates of survival and favourable outcomes. It seems to be reasonable to develop time optimised advance life support protocols to minimise the on-scene time in view of further treatments such as early coronary angiography as part of post-resuscitation care or extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

scholarly journals Incidence and Outcomes of Out‐of‐Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Singapore and Victoria: A Collaborative Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (21) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shir Lynn Lim ◽  
Karen Smith ◽  
Kylie Dyson ◽  
Siew Pang Chan ◽  
Arul Earnest ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Emergency Medical Services ◽  
Prehospital Care ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
World Health ◽  
Medical Services ◽  
Emergency Medical ◽  
Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Background Incidence and outcomes of out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) vary between communities. We aimed to examine differences in patient characteristics, prehospital care, and outcomes in Singapore and Victoria. Methods and Results Using the prospective Singapore Pan‐Asian Resuscitation Outcomes Study and Victorian Ambulance Cardiac Arrest Registry, we identified 11 061 and 32 003 emergency medical services‐attended adult OHCAs between 2011 and 2016 respectively. Incidence and survival rates were directly age adjusted using the World Health Organization population. Survival was analyzed with logistic regression, with model selection via backward elimination. Of the 11 061 and 14 834 emergency medical services‐treated OHCAs (overall mean age±SD 65.5±17.2; 67.4% males) in Singapore and Victoria respectively, 11 054 (99.9%) and 5595 (37.7%) were transported, and 440 (4.0%) and 2009 (13.6%) survived. Compared with Victoria, people with OHCA in Singapore were older (66.7±16.5 versus 64.6±17.7), had less shockable rhythms (17.7% versus 30.3%), and received less bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (45.7% versus 58.5%) and defibrillation (1.3% versus 2.5%) (all P <0.001). Age‐adjusted OHCA incidence and survival rates increased in Singapore between 2011 and 2016 ( P <0.01 for trend), but remained stable, though higher, in Victoria. Likelihood of survival increased significantly ( P <0.001) with arrest in public locations (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.81), witnessed arrest (aOR 2.14), bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (aOR 1.72), initial shockable rhythm (aOR 9.82), and bystander defibrillation (aOR 2.04) but decreased with increasing age (aOR 0.98) and emergency medical services response time (aOR 0.91). Conclusions Singapore reported increasing OHCA incidence and survival rates between 2011 and 2016, compared with stable, albeit higher, rates in Victoria. Survival differences might be related to different emergency medical services practices including patient selection for resuscitation and transport.

P4170Survival after dispatcher assisted CPR in out of hospital cardiac arrest compared to CPR without dispatcher assistance and no CPR before emergency medical services arrival – a nationwide study

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
G Riva ◽  
M Jonsson ◽  
M Ringh ◽  
A Claesson ◽  
T Djarv ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Emergency Medical Services ◽  
Time Delays ◽  
Medical Services ◽  
Absolute Difference ◽  
Nationwide Study ◽  
Emergency Medical ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract Background Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) before arrival of emergency medical services (EMS) is associated with survival in out-of hospital cardiac arrest. Dispatcher assisted CPR (DA-CPR) has been shown to increase CPR rates. However there are several challenges to successful DA-CPR, such as identification of cardiac arrest, time delays to CPR instructions, time delays to start of chest compression and quality of CPR. Purpose The aim of this study is to assess survival in out of hospital cardiac arrest after no CPR, DA-CPR and CPR without dispatcher assistance before EMS arrival in a nationwide cardiac arrest register. Methods A register based observational study. All consecutive Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrests reported to the Swedish Register for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in 2010–2017 were collected. Patients with cardiac arrest witnessed by EMS, who received CPR by off-duty medical professionals, missing data on CPR, DA-CPR or survival were excluded. Exposure was categorized as either; no CPR before EMS arrival (NO-CPR), dispatcher assisted CPR before EMS arrival (DA-CPR) and CPR before EMS arrival without dispatcher assistance, spontaneous CPR (S-CPR). Propensity score matched cohorts were used for comparison between groups. Primary endpoint was 30-day survival. Results Out of 36309, a total of 15471 patients were included, 41.6% received NO-CPR 31.0% received DA-CPR and 27.4% received S-CPR. In propensity score matched cohorts survival to 30-days was 9.0% after NO-CPR, 13.6% after DA-CPR and 15.8% after S-CPR. Using DA-CPR as reference, NO-CPR was associated with lower survival (Conditional OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.52–0.72), absolute difference 4.6% (95% CI 3.0%-6.2%) and S-CPR was associated with higher survival (Conditional OR 1.21 (95% CI 1.05–1.39), absolute difference 2.3% (95% CI 0.5%-4.0%). 30-day survival Conclusion In this nationwide study spontaneous CPR was associated with the highest survival. When spontaneous CPR is not initiated DA-CPR is a reasonable option. Acknowledgement/Funding Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation

scholarly journals Confirmed cardiac output on emergency medical services arrival as confounding by indication: an observational study of prehospital airway management in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

2019 ◽  
pp. emermed-2018-208107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Sakurai ◽  
Kosaku Kinoshita ◽  
Yukihiro Maeda ◽  
Yosuke Homma ◽  
Yoshio Tahara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiac Output ◽  
Airway Management ◽  
Emergency Medical Services ◽  
Neurological Outcome ◽  
Medical Services ◽  
Confounding By Indication ◽  
Emergency Medical ◽  
Prehospital Airway Management ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

ObjectivesMany registry studies on patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) have reported that conventional bag-valve-mask (BVM) ventilation is independently associated with favourable outcomes. This study aimed to compare the data of patients with OCHA with confirmed cardiac output on emergency medical services (EMS) arrival and consider the confounding factors in prehospital airway management studies.MethodsThis was a cohort study using the registry data for survivors after out-of hospital cardiac arrest in the Kanto region at 2012 in Japan (SOS-KANTO 2012). Survivors who received advanced airway management (AAM) group and a BVM group were compared for confirmed cardiac output on EMS arrival and neurolgical outcome at 1 month. Favourable neurological outcome was defined as a score of one or two on the Cerebral Performance Categories Scale. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust the neurological outcome by age, gender, cardiac aetiology, witnessed arrest, shockable rhythm, cardiopulmonary resuscitation performed by a bystander, BVM at prehospital ventilation and presence of confirmed cardiac output on EMS arrival.ResultsA total of 16 452 patients were enrolled in the SOS-KANTO 2012 study, and of those data 12 867 were analysed; 5893 patients comprised the AAM group and 6974 comprised the BVM group. Of the study participants, 386 (2.9%) had confirmed cardiac output on EMS arrival; 340 (2.6%) of the entire study group had a favourable neurological outcome. The proportion of patients with confirmed cardiac output on EMS arrival was significantly higher in the BVM group (272: 3.9%) than in the AAM group (114: 1.9%) (95% CI: 1.65 to 2.25). The proportion of patients with favourable neurological outcomes was 30% (117/386) in those with cardiac output on EMS arrival compared with 1.8% (223/12481) in those without. The OR for a good neurological outcome with BVM decreased from 3.24 (2.49 to 4.20) to 2.60 (1.97 to 3.44) when confirmed cardiac output on EMS arrival was added to the multivariable model analysis.ConclusionConfirmed cardiac output on EMS arrival should be considered as confounding by indication in observational studies of prehospital airway management.

P489Survival in children with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest after standard or chest compression-only bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation before emergency medical services arrival

EP Europace ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Goto ◽  
A Funada ◽  
T Maeda ◽  
F Okada ◽  
Y Goto
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Emergency Medical Services ◽  
Chest Compression ◽  
Medical Services ◽  
Emergency Medical ◽  
Traumatic Origin ◽  
Neurologically Intact ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Over Time

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (KAKENHI Grant No. 18K09999) Background For out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), current cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) guidelines recommend chest compression-only bystander CPR (C- BCPR) for both untrained and trained bystanders unwilling to perform rescue breaths before emergency medical services personnel arrival. However, during 3 consecutive guideline periods, changes in type of BCPR and neurologically intact survival rate are unclear in paediatric OHCA cases. Purpose We aimed to determine the change in the rate and type of BCPR in correlation to the 1-month neurologically intact survival and causes of OHCA. Methods We reviewed 5461 children with bystander witnessed OHCA included in the All-Japan Utstein-style registry from 2005 to 2017. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the type of BCPR: no BCPR (NO-BCPR), standard BCPR with rescue breaths (S-BCPR), and C-BCPR. Guideline periods 2005 to 2010 (pre-G2010), 2011 to 2015 (G2010), and 2016 to 2017 (G2015) were used for comparison over time. The study endpoint was 1-month neurologically intact survival (Cerebral Performance Category [CPC] scale 1 or 2; CPC 1–2). Results The rates of patients receiving any BCPR and 1-month CPC 1–2 by year significantly increased from 46.2% and 9.4% in 2005 to 61.3% and 15.7% in 2017 (all P for trend &lt;0.0001), respectively. The rates of patients receiving C-BCPR in the pre-G2010 period significantly increased from 21.6% to 35.5% in the G2010 period, and to 40.4% in the G2015 period (P for trend &lt;0.0001); the overall proportion of cases with 1-month CPC 1–2 increased from 9.1% to 10.8% and 14.7%, respectively (P for trend &lt;0.0001). Particularly, in patients receiving C-BCPR, CPC 1–2 rate significantly increased from 9.5% in the pre-G2010 period to 19.0% in the G2015 period (P for trend &lt;0.0001). For all time periods, 1-month CPC 1–2 rate in the S-BCPR (17.2%) cohort was significantly higher than those in the C-BCPR (12.5%) and NO-BCPR (6.4%) cohorts (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] of S-BCPR compared with C-BCPR, 1.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.25–2.01; P &lt; 0.0001; compared with NO-BCPR, aOR 2.31; 95% CI, 1.82–2.94; P &lt; 0.0001). No significant difference between S-BCPR and C-BCPR was found in 1-month CPC 1–2 rate for patients with non-traumatic origin (17.7% vs. 16.3%; aOR, 1.23, 95% CI, 0.95–1.59, all P &gt;0.05). However, in patients with traumatic origin, S-BCPR was superior to C-BCPR (15.1% vs. 3.4%; aOR, 4.53, 95% CI, 2.39–8.61, all P &lt;0.0001). During the 3 guidelines periods, the CPC 1–2 rate in patients with non-traumatic origin significantly increased from 11.8% to 19.7% (P for trend &lt; 0.0001), but not in patients with traumatic origin (from 4.9% to 4.1%, P for trend = 0.29). Conclusions During the 3 guidelines periods, the rate of C-BCPR and 1-month CPC 1–2 increased by approximately 2-fold each over time. C-BCPR was associated with increased odds of 1-month CPC 1–2 similar to S-BCPR for children with non-traumatic origin but not in those with traumatic origin.

scholarly journals Dispatcher Assistance in Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest: Approaches for Diagnosing Cardiac Arrest by Telephone

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. A. Birkun ◽  
L. I. Dezhurny
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Emergency Medical Services ◽  
Quality Evaluation ◽  
General Concept ◽  
Medical Services ◽  
Emergency Medical ◽  
Telephone Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Rapid recognition of cardiac arrest based on the data reported by a bystander, and delivering telephone cardiopulmonary resuscitation instructions by emergency medical services (EMS) dispatcher promote timely provision of frst aid by people who witness the emergency, and this may signifcantly influence the outcome of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). This review is aimed to analyze the up-to-date scientifc literature on EMS dispatcher recognition of OHCA. In particular, general concept and experience of algorithm-based diagnosis of cardiac arrest, diffculties of telephone OHCA recognition, approaches for dispatcher diagnosis quality evaluation and assurance are discussed herein. Based on the analysis results, recommendations on organizing and improving the effectiveness of EMS dispatcher recognition of cardiac arrest are formulated. The review is designed primarily for EMS and public health specialists.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document