Abstract P464: Thirty Day Stroke and Mortality After Carotid Revascularization Among Octogenarians With Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis: Real-World Data Analysis From a National Surgical Quality Registry

Introduction: Due to their exclusion from most clinical trials, outcomes of carotid revascularization via a carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenting (CAS) among octogenarians are not well studied. Herein, we present analysis of thirty-day stroke and mortality of patients aged ≥ 80 using real-world data from a national surgical quality registry. Methods: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) targeted dataset for CEA and CAS was queried for patients aged ≥ 80 undergoing CEA and CAS between 2012-2018. Results: A total of 94 and 2,656 patients aged ≥ 80 with symptomatic carotid stenosis undergoing CAS and CEA (respectively) were identified. Patients in the CAS group were more likely to be over 90 (p=0.006). Patients in the CAS group were more likely to have high-risk anatomy (p<0.001) and more likely to be on aspirin preoperatively (p=0.02) but less likely to have higher ASA (p<0.001). Most patients in the group presented with an ipsilateral stroke (CAS: 43.6% and CEA: 41.7%). The rate of thirty-day composite outcome (stroke or death) was found to be 5.3% in the CAS group and 4.5% in the CEA group (p=0.714) (stroke: 2.1% for CAS and 3.2% for CEA; death: 4.3% for CAS and 1.7% for CEA). Upon multivariable analysis, procedure type (CAS vs CEA) was not found to be associated with the composite-outcome (OR 1.1, 95%CI 0.43-2.82,p=0.836). Symptom presentation other than ipsilateral stroke was found to be associated with significantly decreased odds of 30-day composite outcome (amaurosis-fugax/transient monocular blindness: OR 0.42,95%CI 0.21-0.86, p=0.02; TIA: OR 0.62, 95%CI 0.42-0.93,p=0.02), while higher age was found to be associated with significantly increased odds (OR 1.512, 95%CI 1.01-2.24, p=0.02). Conclusion: Real world analysis from a surgical quality registry show that both CAS and CEA are associated with optimal 30-day outcomes among octogenarians with symptomatic carotid stenosis.

Download Full-text

Abstract P489: Differences in Characteristics of Octogenarian Patients Undergoing Carotid Artery Stenting and Carotid Endarterectomy for Carotid Stenosis: Insights From a Real World Surgical Quality Registry

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.52.suppl_1.p489 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Mohammed Ali Alvi ◽

Yagiz Yolcu ◽

Kenan Rajjoub ◽

Ozan Dikilitas

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Carotid Artery ◽

Carotid Endarterectomy ◽

Carotid Stenosis ◽

Real World ◽

Carotid Artery Stenting ◽

Real World Data ◽

Surgical Quality ◽

World Data ◽

Quality Registry

Introduction: Several clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of a carotid revascularization procedure excluded patients above age 80. In the current study, we sought to assess the differences in characteristics of octogenarians undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) for carotid stenosis using “real-world” data from a national surgical quality registry. Methods: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) targeted datasets for CEA and CAS were queried for patients aged ≥80 years between 2012-2018. Results: We identified 5,814 patients undergoing CEA and 189 patients undergoing CAS. Patients in the CAS group were more likely to be ≥90 years (p=0.004), diabetic (p=0.04), had a history of CHF (p=0.012) and a bleeding-disorder (p<0.001). Patients in the CAS group were also more likely to have high risk anatomy (p<0.001), high-risk-physiology (p=0.028). Ninety-nine (52.4%) patients in the CAS group and 2,775 (47.7%) in the CEA group were symptomatic, with most patients in both groups presenting with an ipsilateral stroke. Among asymptomatic patients, 64 (74%) in the CAS group and 2222 (72.7%) in the CEA group had severe/total stenosis (>80%-100%) of the ipsilateral carotid, while 13(14.5%) in the CAS group and 302 (11%) in the CEA group had severe or total stenosis of contralateral carotid. Among symptomatic patients, 58(61.7%) in the CAS group and 1527 (57.5%) in the CEA group were found to have severe/total stenosis of the ipsilateral-carotid, while 12(12.8%) in the CAS group and 208(7.8%) in the CEA group were found to have severe/total occlusion of the contralateral carotid. In the carotid endarterectomy group, 12.2% (n=711) underwent CEA-alone, 44.3% (n=2,575) CEA with angioplasty, 29.9% (n=1,737) CEA with angioplasty and shunt, 2.9% (n=166) CEA with shunt and 10.7%(n=166) eversion CEA. In the CAS group, 52.4%(n=99) underwent CAS with a single tapered stent, 29.1%(n=55) CAS with single tapered stent with CPD, 11.1%(n=21) single straight stent with CPD and 1.6%(n=3) a single straight stent alone. Conclusion: These analyses from real-world data show that there may be some differences in demographic and comorbid characteristics between octogenarians undergoing CAS and CEA.

Download Full-text

Hemodynamic Depression of Early Carotid Revascularization on Ischemic Stroke Patients with Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis

Journal of Neurocritical Care ◽

10.18700/jnc.170012 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 10 (2) ◽

pp. 92-98

Author(s):

Jun Woo Kim ◽

Youngrok Do

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Carotid Stenosis ◽

Stroke Patients ◽

Carotid Revascularization ◽

Symptomatic Carotid ◽

Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis

Download Full-text

Abstract P566: Identifying Sex-Specific Differences in the Carotid Revascularization Literature: Findings From a Scoping Review

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.52.suppl_1.p566 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Vignan Yogendrakumar ◽

Michel C Shamy ◽

Brian Dewar ◽

Dean Fergusson ◽

Dar Dowlatshahi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Carotid Stenosis ◽

Medical Therapy ◽

Scoping Review ◽

Sufficient Information ◽

Significant Heterogeneity ◽

Long Term Outcomes ◽

Carotid Revascularization ◽

Symptomatic Carotid ◽

Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis

Background and Purpose: No systematic review of the literature has dedicated itself to looking at the management of symptomatic carotid stenosis in women. In this scoping review, we aimed to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that reported sex-specific outcomes for patients who underwent carotid revascularization, and determine whether sufficient information is reported within these studies to assess women’s short and long-term outcomes. Methods: We systematically searched Medline, Embase, Pubmed, and Cochrane libraries for RCTs published between 1991 and 2020 that included women and compared either endarterectomy with stenting, or any revascularization (endarterectomy or stenting) with medical therapy in patients with symptomatic high grade (greater than 50%) carotid stenosis. Results: From 1,537 references examined, 27 eligible studies were identified. Sex-specific outcomes were reported in 13 studies. Baseline patient characteristics of enrolled women were reported in 2 of those 13 studies. Common outcomes reported included stroke and death, however there was significant heterogeneity in the reporting of both periprocedural and long-term outcomes. Sex-specific differences relating to the degree of stenosis and time from index event to treatment were limited to studies comparing endarterectomy to medical therapy. Adverse events were not reported by sex. Conclusions: Half of the previously published RCTs and systematic reviews report sex-specific outcomes. Detailed analysis on the benefits of carotid artery intervention for women with symptomatic stenosis is limited . Further analysis with individual patient data and a network meta-analysis is the necessary next step to better assess the treatment effects of carotid management in women.

Download Full-text

Timing of Carotid Endarterectomy for Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis: A Snapshot of Current Trends and Systematic Review of Literature on Changing Paradigm towards Early Surgery

Neurosurgery ◽

10.1093/neuros/nyy557 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 85 (2) ◽

pp. E214-E225 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Amey R Savardekar ◽

Vinayak Narayan ◽

Devi P Patra ◽

Robert F Spetzler ◽

Hai Sun

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Carotid Endarterectomy ◽

Carotid Stenosis ◽

Current Literature ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Review Of Literature ◽

Carotid Revascularization ◽

Symptomatic Carotid ◽

Index Event ◽

Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis

Abstract Carotid revascularization has been recommended as the maximally beneficial treatment for stroke prevention in patients with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis (SCS). The appropriate timing for performing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) within the first 14 d after the occurrence of the index event remains controversial. We aim to provide a snapshot of the pertinent current literature related to the timing of CEA for patients with SCS. A systematic review of literature was conducted to study the timing of CEA for SCS. The guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) were followed. A total of 63 articles were identified as relevant to this topic. A summary of 15 articles favoring urgent CEA (within 48 h) for SCS within 48 h of index event and 9 articles not favoring urgent CEA is presented. A consensus is still to be achieved on the ideal timing of CEA for SCS within the 14-d window presently prescribed. The current literature suggests that patients who undergo urgent CEA (within 48 h) after nondisabling stroke as the index event have an increased periprocedural risk as compared to those who had transient ischemic attack (TIA) as the index event. Further prospective studies and clinical trials studying this question with separate groups classified as per the index event are required to shed more light on the subject. The current literature points to a changing paradigm towards early carotid surgery, specifically targeted within 48 h if the index event is TIA, and within 7 d if the index event is stroke.

Download Full-text