scholarly journals Prediction of Stroke Onset Is Improved by Relative Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery and Perfusion Imaging Compared to the Visual Diffusion-Weighted Imaging/Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery Mismatch

Stroke ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (10) ◽  
pp. 2559-2564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anke Wouters ◽  
Patrick Dupont ◽  
Bo Norrving ◽  
Rico Laage ◽  
Götz Thomalla ◽  
...  
Stroke ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenta Seki ◽  
Masatoshi Koga ◽  
Shoichiro Sato ◽  
Kazunari Homma ◽  
Sohei Yoshimura ◽  
...  

Background and purpose: Although the diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) mismatch (DFM) can be a surrogate marker of stroke onset time, DFM at 3T MRI may represent different clinical implications from that at 1.5T MRI. We aimed to compare the prevalence of DFM between 1.5T and 3T MRI, and assess factors associated with the FLAIR lesion positivity, and analyze a sensitivity and a specificity of DFM to identify patients ≤ 4.5h of stroke onset. Methods: Consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke who underwent 3T or 1.5T MRI including DWI and FLAIR ≤ 12h of onset were enrolled. Random allocation regarding the magnetic field strength was performed according to the MRI availability. More than two stroke neurologists judged whether there is DFM. We identified ischemic lesion corresponding to stroke symptom on DWI and then determined whether the FLAIR lesion positivity is negative, subtle (only slightly different from adjacent parenchyma) or evident (a clearly high signal). DFM was defined as the FLAIR negative or subtle corresponding to the DWI lesion. Results: Of 179 patients (women, 39%; 72±11 years) studied, 89 and 90 received 3T and 1.5T MRI, respectively. The median onset to MRI time (OMT) was 2.5h at both 3T and 1.5T MRI. The FLAIR positivity was negative in 51% at 3T vs. 30% at 1.5T, subtle in 22% vs. 27% and evident in 27% vs. 43%, respectively (p=0.015); thus DFM was identified in 73% vs. 57% (p=0.028). On ordinal logistic regression with backward stepwise selection, 3T MRI (OR 0.40, 95%CI 0.22-0.71) and infratentorial infarction (OR 0.29, 95%CI 0.12-0.68) were negatively, and OMT (per 1h, OR 1.18, 95%CI 1.07-1.30) was positively associated with the FLAIR lesion positivity. DFM ≤ 4.5h was more frequently observed at 3T than 1.5T MRI (80% vs. 60%, p=0.015). Using DFM, patients ≤ 4.5h of onset were detected with a sensitivity of 0.80, a specificity of 0.42, a positive predictive value of 0.77 and a negative predictive value of 0.46 at 3T MRI and 0.60, 0.53, 0.82 and 0.26, respectively, at 1.5T MRI. Conclusions: DFM was more frequently observed at 3T than at 1.5T MRI. Because the FLAIR lesion was associated with 1.5T rather than 3T, DFM at 3T may have different implications regarding time after stroke onset from that at 1.5T.


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 404-409
Author(s):  
Alex Mun-Ching Wong ◽  
Chih-Hua Yeh ◽  
Jainn-Jim Lin ◽  
I-Jun Chou ◽  
Kuang-Lin Lin

In children with rhombencephalitis, neuroimaging abnormalities have been infrequently correlated with clinical outcome. We investigated whether magnetic resonance (MR) neuroimaging studies could predict clinical outcomes and disturbance of consciousness in patients with rhombencephalitis. We retrospectively analyzed the MR studies of 19 pediatric patients with rhombencephalitis (median age: 4.2 years, range 0.5-17; sex: 32% male). Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging findings were graded to create imaging scores according to the extent of imaging abnormality. Clinical outcomes in the first week and 12th month were graded by using Glasgow Outcome Scale scores (1-5) and dichotomized to unfavorable or favorable outcome. Correlations of the imaging scores with the clinical outcomes and with disturbance of consciousness were assessed by using multivariate logistic regression analysis. No significant correlation was found between fluid-attenuated inversion recovery score or diffusion-weighted imaging score ( P = .608, P = .132, respectively) and disturbance of consciousness. In the first week, the unfavorable outcome group (n = 11) had significantly higher diffusion-weighted imaging score than did the favorable outcome group (n = 8) (Mann-Whitney U test, P = .005). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the diffusion-weighted imaging score (odds ratio, 18.182; 95% confidence interval: 1.36, 243.01; P = .028) was significantly associated with unfavorable outcome. In the 12th month, the fluid-attenuated inversion recovery score or diffusion-weighted imaging score ( P = .994, P = .997, respectively) were not significantly associated with unfavorable outcome. Patients with rhombencephalitis who have a higher diffusion-weighted imaging score are more likely to have an unfavorable 1-week clinical outcome.


2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 292-300
Author(s):  
Fumihiro Sakakibara ◽  
Shinichi Yoshimura ◽  
Soichiro Numa ◽  
Kazutaka Uchida ◽  
Norito Kinjo ◽  
...  

Background and Purpose: Diffusion-weighted imaging-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (DWI-FLAIR) mismatch is an early sign of acute ischemic stroke. DWI-FLAIR mismatch was reported to be valuable to select patients with unknown onset stroke who are eligible to receive intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), but its utility is less studied in patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute large vessel occlusion (LVO). We thus investigated the functional outcomes at 90 days between patients with DWI-FLAIR mismatch and those with match who underwent MT for LVO. Methods: We conducted a historical cohort study in consecutive patients who were evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging for suspected stroke at a single center. We enrolled patients with occlusion of internal carotid artery or horizontal or vertical segment of middle cerebral artery who underwent MT within 24 h after they were last known to be well. DWI-FLAIR mismatch was defined when a visible acute ischemic lesion was present on DWI without traceable parenchymal hyperintensity on FLAIR. Image analysis was done by 2 stroke neurologists independently. We estimated the adjusted odds ratio (OR) of DWI-FLAIR mismatch relative to DWI-FLAIR match for moderate outcome defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0–3, favorable outcome defined as mRS 0–2 and mortality at 90 days after the onset, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) within 72 h after the onset. Results: Of the 380 patients who received MT, 202 were included. Patients with DWI-FLAIR mismatch (146 [72%]) had significantly higher baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (median 16 vs. 13, p = 0.01), more transferred-in (78 vs. 63%, p = 0.02), more IVT (45 vs. 18%, p = 0.0003), more cardioembolism (69 vs. 54%, p = 0.03), and shorter onset-to-hospital door times (median 175 vs. 371 min, p < 0.0001) than patients with DWI-FLAIR match. Patients with DWI-FLAIR mismatch had more moderate outcome than those with DWI-FLAIR match (61 vs. 52%, p = 0.24), and the adjusted OR was 3.12 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.35–7.19, p = 0.008). sICH within 72 h was less frequent in the DWI-FLAIR mismatch group (10 vs. 20%, p = 0.06), with an adjusted OR of 0.36 (95% CI: 0.13–0.97, p = 0.044). The adjusted ORs for favorable outcome and mortality were 0.87 (95% CI: 0.39–1.94, p = 0.73) and 0.63 (95% CI: 0.20–2.05, p = 0.44), respectively. Conclusions: DWI-FLAIR mismatch was associated with more moderate outcome and less sICH in the adjusted analysis in patients receiving MT for acute LVO. DWI-FLAIR mismatch could be useful to select patients with unknown onset stroke who are eligible to receive MT for acute LVO.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document