Positron Emission Tomographic Studies of the Processing of Singe Words

1989 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven E. Petersen ◽  
Peter T. Fox ◽  
Michael I. Posner ◽  
Mark Mintun ◽  
Marcus E. Raichle

PET images of blood flow change that were averaged across individuals were used to identify brain areas related to lexical (single-word) processing, A small number of discrete areas were activated during several task conditions including: modality-specific (auditory or visual) areas activated by passive word input, primary motor and premotor areas during speech output, and yet further areas during tasks making semantic or intentional demands.

Nature ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 331 (6157) ◽  
pp. 585-589 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. E. Petersen ◽  
P. T. Fox ◽  
M. I. Posner ◽  
M. Mintun ◽  
M. E. Raichle

1998 ◽  
Vol 18 (8) ◽  
pp. 896-905 ◽  
Author(s):  
David H. Zald ◽  
Michael J. Donndelinger ◽  
José V. Pardo

Covariance analyses of positron emission tomography (PET) data are used increasingly to elucidate the functional connectivity between brain regions during different cognitive tasks. Functional connectivity may be estimated by examining the covariance between regions over time or across subjects. In functional brain-mapping studies, across-subjects covariance matrices derived from within-task (nonsubtracted) and between-task (subtracted) data characterize different, complementary aspects of functional interactions. The authors study amygdala-orbitofrontal interactions during three task conditions (aversive olfaction, odor detection, and resting with eyes closed) to illustrate the strengths and limitations of across-subjects covariance analyses based on subtracted and nonsubtracted data. This example underscores the dynamic nature of connectivity between the amygdalae and orbitofrontal cortices and highlights the importance of including data from resting conditions in covariance analyses.


Science ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 366 (6461) ◽  
pp. 55-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Hagoort

In this Review, I propose a multiple-network view for the neurobiological basis of distinctly human language skills. A much more complex picture of interacting brain areas emerges than in the classical neurobiological model of language. This is because using language is more than single-word processing, and much goes on beyond the information given in the acoustic or orthographic tokens that enter primary sensory cortices. This requires the involvement of multiple networks with functionally nonoverlapping contributions.


1989 ◽  
Vol 483 (2) ◽  
pp. 355-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fumihito Yoshii ◽  
Myron D. Ginsberg ◽  
Roger E. Kelley ◽  
Jen Y. Chang ◽  
Warren W. Barker ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 29 (9) ◽  
pp. 567-568 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian Q. Yu ◽  
Rakesh Kumar ◽  
Yan Xiu ◽  
Abass Alavi ◽  
Hongming Zhuang

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document