Processing of Prediction Errors in Mentalizing Areas

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 900-912 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lieke Heil ◽  
Olympia Colizoli ◽  
Egbert Hartstra ◽  
Johan Kwisthout ◽  
Stan van Pelt ◽  
...  

When seeing people perform actions, we are able to quickly predict the action's outcomes. These predictions are not solely based on the observed actions themselves but utilize our prior knowledge of others. It has been suggested that observed outcomes that are not in line with these predictions result in prediction errors, which require additional processing to be integrated or updated. However, there is no consensus on whether this is indeed the case for the kind of high-level social–cognitive processes involved in action observation. In this fMRI study, we investigated whether observation of unexpected outcomes causes additional activation in line with the processing of prediction errors and, if so, whether this activation overlaps with activation in brain areas typically associated with social–cognitive processes. In the first part of the experiment, participants watched animated movies of two people playing a bowling game, one experienced and one novice player. In cases where the player's score was higher or lower than expected based on their skill level, there was increased BOLD activity in areas that were also activated during a theory of mind task that participants performed in the second part of the experiment. These findings are discussed in the light of different theoretical accounts of human social–cognitive processing.

2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 2170
Author(s):  
Mehmet Ertuğrul Uçar

Objective: Berzonsky proposed an identity formation model which involves social-cognitive processes.  According to this model, each identity styles involve different social-cognitive processes. In this model, three identity styles were defined: informational, normative, and diffuse–avoidant. Need for closure describe an individual’s desire for a firm answer to a question and an aversion toward ambiguity. Some people have high level of need for closure. Kağıtcıbası’s model suggests that self divided autonomy; relatedness; autonomous-related self in Turkish cultural contexts. The aim of this study is to examine whether need for closure and autonomy; relatedness; autonomous-related self predict identity styles during emerging adulthood.Method: The research group consisted of 263 (70.7% female, 29,3% male) university students. To collect data the autonomy; relatedness; autonomous-related scale, Need for Closure Scale and Identity Style Inventory were used. A stepwiswe regression model was used in order to investigate relations among need for closure, autonomy; relatedness; autonomous-related self type and identity styles.Results: The results of this study indicated that self type and need for closure significantly predict identity styles.Conclusion: The results of this study indicated that autonomy; relatedness; autonomous-related self type predict informational, normative identity styles but autonomy; relatedness; autonomous-related self type and need for closure do not significantly predict diffuse–avoidant identity styles. ÖzetAmaç: Berzonsky kimlik gelişiminde sosyal ve bilişsel süreçleri dikkate alan bir model önermiştir. Bu modele göre bireylerin kimlikleri bilgi yönelimi, norm yönelimi ve kaçınma yönelimi olmak üzere üçe ayrılmaktadır. Tamamlanma ihtiyacı bireylerin yeni ve var olan bilgilerine aykırı bilgilerle karşılaşmaktan hoşlanmamaları ve bu durumda kendilerini yeni bilgiye kapatmaları olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Kağıtçıbaşı’nın modeli Türk kültüründe benliği özerk ilişkisel ve özerk ilişkisel olarak benliği üçe ayırmaktadır Bu araştırmanın temel amacı tamamlanma ihtiyacı ve özerk, ilişsel ve özerk-ilişkisel benlik türlerinin   kimlik stilleri yordayıp yordamadığını  beliren yetişkinlik dönemimde incelemektir.Yöntem: Araştırma grubu 263 (%70.7kadın, %29,3 erkek) üniversite öğrencisinden oluşmaktadır. Çalışmada verilerin toplanmasında Kağıtçıbaşı’nın özerk, ilişkisel, özerk-ilişkisellik ölçeği, Tamamlanma İhtiyacı Ölçeği ve Kimlik Stilleri Envanteri Kullanılmıştır. Tamamlanma ihtiyacı, özerk, ilişsel ve özerk-ilişkisel benlik türlerinin   kimlik stilleri yordayıp yordamadığını beliren yetişkinlik dönemimde incelemek için adımsal regresyon analizi kullanılmıştır. Bulgular: Araştırma sonuçları benlik türleri ve tamamlanma ihtiyacının bireylerin kimlik stillerini anlamlı olarak yordadığını göstermiştir.Sonuç: Araştırma sonuçları Tamamlanma ihtiyacı, özerk, ilişsel ve özerk-ilişkisel benlik türlerinin  bilgi yönelimi, norm yönelimi kimlik stillerini anlamlı olarak yordadığını ama kaçınma yönelimli kimlik stilini yordamadığını göstermiştir.


2013 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 579-590 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda J. Lucas ◽  
Charlie Lewis ◽  
F. Cansu Pala ◽  
Katie Wong ◽  
Damon Berridge

Author(s):  
James S. Uleman ◽  
S. Adil Saribay

“Initial impressions” bring together personality and social psychology like no other field of study—“personality” because (1) impressions are about personalities, and (2) perceivers’ personalities affect these impressions; and “social” because (3) social cognitive processes of impression formation, and (4) sociocultural contexts have major effects on impressions. To make these points, we first review how people explicitly describe others: the terms we use, how these descriptions reveal our theories about others, the important roles of traits and types (including stereotypes) in these descriptions, and other prominent frameworks (e.g., narratives and social roles). Then we highlight recent research on the social cognitive processes underlying these descriptions: automatic and controlled attention, the many effects of primes (semantic and affective) and their dependence on contexts, the acquisition of valence, spontaneous inferences about others, and the interplay of automatic and control processes. Third, we examine how accurate initial impressions are, and what accuracy means, as well as deception and motivated biases and distortions. Fourth, we review recent research on effects of target features, perceiver features, and relations between targets and perceivers. Finally, we look at frameworks for understanding explanations, as distinct from descriptions: attribution theory, theory of mind, and simulation theory.


Appetite ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 126 ◽  
pp. 73-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter A. Hall ◽  
Cassandra J. Lowe ◽  
Adrian B. Safati ◽  
Huaqi Li ◽  
Emilia B. Klassen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document