Daoist Ci 慈, Feminist Ethics of Care, and the Dilemma of Nature

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 275-294
Author(s):  
Ann A. Pang-White

In recent discussion on comparative ethics, extensive scholarship has been devoted to a comparative study of Confucian ren 仁(often translated as humaneness or benevolence) and feminist ethics of care, while such cross-cultural study on the Daoist concept of ci 慈 (customarily translated as compassion) and its intersection with care ethics has been lacking. This paper explores the reasons and concludes that Daoists do care. However, their conception of care goes beyond the Confucian ren and pure care ethics or even counter-opposes them so as to bring forward the true meaning of care. Daoist care is a powerful tool in our approach to ecology.

2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva-Maria Düringer ◽  
Sabine A. Döring

In this comment we take up two points made by Douglas Hollan in his article “Emerging Issues in the Cross-Cultural Study of Empathy,” and discuss their possible philosophical implications. Hollan‘s concept of complex empathy may give rise to the idea that we can learn about other people’s beliefs via empathy, which is something we do not believe is possible. Furthermore, Hollan’s description of possible negative effects of empathy, such as manipulations of a person on the basis of knowledge about their emotions, might pose a problem for proponents of care ethics, who generally start from the assumption that empathy fosters altruistic behavior.


2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole Gullekson ◽  
Sean D. Robinson ◽  
Luis Ortiz ◽  
Marcus J. Fila ◽  
Charles Ritter ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula J. Schwanenflugel ◽  
Mike Martin ◽  
Tomone Takahashi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document