Testing the competitive exclusion principle using various niche parameters in a native (Natrix maura) and an introduced (N. tessellata) colubrid

2009 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 523-531 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvain Ursenbacher ◽  
Philippe Christe ◽  
César Metzger

AbstractDespite the increase of animal and plant introductions worldwide and the strong augmentation of the reptile trade, few invasive snake populations have been studied. Dice snakes (Natrix tessellata) were introduced to the shores of Lake Geneva (Switzerland) in the early 1920s, and are now well established. This region of introduction was previously inhabited by Viperine snakes (N. maura). Ever since these two species have been under monitoring (which began in 1996) the Viperine snake population has shown drastic decline. We examine here the possibility of trophic competition by analysing diet composition, prey size and trophic niche overlap. Spatial distribution is also assessed in order to address the question of spatial competitive exclusion. We found very similar diets, and thus a high trophic niche overlap, indicating no partitioning of the trophic resource. No arguments in favour of spatial competitive exclusion were found. Our study suggests that trophic competition may occur between the two natricines and that it may give an explanation for the drastic decline of the Viperine snake in this area. Other pathways potentially playing a role in the exclusion of the Viperine snake are discussed.

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-123
Author(s):  
James Justus ◽  

Perhaps no concept has been thought more important to ecological theorizing than the niche. Without it, technically sophisticated and well-regarded accounts of character displacement, ecological equivalence, limiting similarity, and others would seemingly never have been developed. The niche is also widely considered the centerpiece of the best candidate for a distinctively ecological law, the competitive exclusion principle. But the incongruous array and imprecise character of proposed definitions of the concept square poorly with its apparent scientific centrality. I argue this definitional diversity and imprecision reflects a problematic conceptual indeterminacy that challenges its putative indispensability in ecology.


1970 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 1187-1199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald A. Smith ◽  
S. Wayne Speller

P. m. gracilis and P. l. noveboracensis are sympatric in southeastern Ontario and some adjacent areas. Similar in appearance, food and breeding habits, and frequently cohabiting certain forests, they may occupy identical niches, contrary to the competitive exclusion principle. A 12-week summer live-trapping study in a woodlot containing upland, mixed, and cedar forest associations showed that although most of their population characteristics were similar, their local distributions, densities, and certain behaviors differed. Noveboracensis inhabited upland forest but avoided mixed and cedar forest associations apparently because suitable refuges were lacking. The less dense population of gracilis was ubiquitous; gracilis and noveboracensis cohabited the upland forest. On release from traps noveboracensis sometimes 'froze' before darting in a zigzag manner to nearby cover, and ran up trees significantly more than gracilis, which usually ran instantly, rapidly, and directly to a more distant ground refuge. Low densities of both species reduced competition for available food and refuges. This may have facilitated cohabitation in the upland forest where differential use of ground- and tree-holes also contributed to reduction of competition and thus to compatibility. Coexistence may be transitory there; with denser populations, potential competition might be minimized by emigration of the more exploratory gracilis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document