3 The Earthquake Clause in Fire Insurance Contracts: The Limits of International Standardisation (1907–1912)

Author(s):  
J. L. Gill

Property owners in New Zealand obtain indemnity against loss or damage occurring as a direct result of earthquake shock or earthquake fire under a compulsory extension to a contract of fire insurance. A special earthquake and war damage premium is levied under fire insurance contracts made in New Zealand and is paid by the insurer into a fund which is administered by the Commission under the Earthquake and War Damage Act 1944.


2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-41
Author(s):  
Guo-Xue Gu ◽  
◽  
Shang-Mei Zhao

Public fire insurance has recently appeared in China. The basis for calculating the premium is the accurate measurement of Publicliability risk in fire. The generalized linear model (GLM) is widely used for measuring this risk in practice, but the GLM often cannot be satisfied, especially in fat-tailed distribution. A nonparametric Gaussian kernel linear model used to improve the GLM is applied to measure publicliability risk in fire, yielding a favorable effect. Results show three major risk factors that were measured precisely – the nature of the industry, the scale of public places and the level of fire precaution.


1963 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 345-351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans Andersson

In his paper “Actuarial Activity in General Insurance in the Northern Countries of Europe” L. Wilhelmsen gives amongst other things an account of the work carried on by Centralstället för nordisk ömsesidig Brandförsäkringsstatistik (CNÖB, the Northern Central Office for Fire Insurance Statistics from Mutual Companies). In this he states that one part of the organisation's work is the carrying out of special investigations of current problems with material collected on each occasion for the purpose.The object of this paper is to report investigations carried out in CNÖB on the connection between temperature and risk premium in fire insurance. The material used is made up exclusively of civil risks (buildings) and the material has been taken from Sweden and Norway. The background to the investigation consists in the fact that in Scandinavia the risk premiums for fire insurance show an apparent geographical variation, in that the amount clearly increases in the most northerly provinces.As we know that the fire damage directly or indirectly caused by heating systems (chimney fires, cracked building blocks, embers from fireplaces or chimneys etc.) represents a large proportion of the damage in civil risks (40-50%, in some materials 60% or more), that the proportion is greatest in the northern parts and that in the Swedish material about 50% of the damage in any one area falls in the four months December to March, it is quite reasonable to trace the influence of the temperature factor behind the geographical variation; the colder the climate, the more lighting of fires and the more damage. This line of argument is connected exclusively to the frequency of damage; we shall return later to the mean degree of damage.


Archivaria ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 150-173
Author(s):  
Jean Dryden

Fire insurance plans are among the most valuable records documenting the development of Canada’s cities and towns during the late 19th and 20th centuries. Many of these plans are preserved in Canada’s archives and libraries. However, for nearly three decades, making copies for researchers and (more recently) digitizing for online access have been subject to a copyright “chill” as a result of the copyright claims of the companies that created these plans and their successors. This article recounts the history of Canadian fire insurance plans preserved in Canadian repositories and establishes their current copyright status in terms of ownership and duration. The article then explores the extent to which the copyright concerns are justified and offers possible solutions.


1963 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 356-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. P. Welten

The estimation of stop loss premiums can be based on some knowledge about the distribution function of the sum of all claims in a year (assuming that the stop loss insurance relates to a period of one calender year). Generally speaking there are two methods to obtain this knowledge about the distribution function.1. The first method is to construct a distribution function from data concerning:a. the distribution function of the number of claims per year, taking into account the variability of the parameter(s) of this distribution function.b. the distribution function of the insured sums.c. the distribution function of partial claims.d. the correlation between the insured sum and the probability of occurring of a claim.e. the probability of contagion.2. The second method is to derive a distribution function from the year's totals of claims over a long series of years, expressed in e.g: units of the totals of insured sums in that years.In practice it is often difficult to find a useful basis to apply one of these methods. Data concerning the distribution function of the number of claims per year, of the insured sums, and of partial claims are mostly available, but often nothing is known about the correlation between the insured sum and the probability of occurring of a claim.The second method is mostly not applicable because, if the year's totals of claims over a long series of, by preference recent, years are available, these data often turn out to be heterogeneous or to be correlated with time. If, in that case, only the data of the most recent years are used, the number of these data is often a too small basis for the construction of a distribution function.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document