Sustainable Development and Investment: Trends in Law-Making and Arbitration

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 327-353
Author(s):  
Johanna Aleria P Lorenzo

More than being funders of development projects, international financial institutions (IFIs) should also be viewed as international law-makers, or more specifically as participants in the international law-making process relating to sustainable development. Achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), as endorsed by the UN General Assembly, relies not only on the IFIs’ continued performance of their economic functions, but also on their collective efforts to set and apply standards for integrating economic, environmental and social considerations in development projects. In presenting IFIs as law-makers in the field of sustainable development, this article focuses on the ‘safeguard systems’ that IFIs have individually created in order to ensure the sustainability of the development projects they finance. Through the safeguard system and its components’ respective functions, IFIs clarify, elaborate and operationalise the concept of sustainable development, and thereby participate in the international law-making process relating to this concept. Additionally, the IFIs’ participation involves enabling other non-state actors to also participate in development decision-making at the international level. The law-making functions of IFIs and the emergence of a droit commun among them bear valuable insights and implications on the current discussion surrounding the new institutions, whose entry into the multilateral development banking system has elicited anxiety about a race to the bottom in sustainability standards. This article shows why this speculated outcome is not a foregone conclusion. It suggests that preventing a race to the bottom in sustainability standards entails strengthening one component of the safeguard system, the independent accountability mechanism, which interprets the system's other component, ie the IFIs’ environmental and social policies. The ongoing efforts to harmonise the IFIs’ safeguard policies should likewise be encouraged. As specialised international organisations and members of the international community, the IFIs (and their member states) should react to adverse competitive pressures with the overarching consideration of responding to the demands and expectations of the international community. This approach means continuing to implement the global commitment to the sustainable development principles of integration and public participation, as well as maintaining the protection of the rights and interests of people affected by development projects.


Fisheries ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (5) ◽  
pp. 51-57
Author(s):  
Kamil Bekyashev ◽  
Damir Bekyashev

The article deals with the concept, content and legal consolidation of the term “sustainable use of marine living resources”. The article analyzes the norms of universal, regional and bilateral international treaties that consolidate and disclose this term. The norms of the national legislation of states are considered. Special attention is paid to the main provisions of Goal 14 of the Sustainable Development Goals, with an emphasis on those related to the conservation of marine living resources. The law-making activity of the Russian Federation on the implementation of Goal 14 is considered. Recommendations for improving the legislation of the Russian Federation, aimed at achieving the Goal are developed.


Author(s):  
Hagen Henrÿ

This chapter first outlines the legitimacy of measuring co-operative law by the internationally recognized co-operative principles, and the evolution of co-operative law across the globe over the past decades. Based thereupon it then suggests re-establishing the rationale for a co-operative law which distinguishes co-operatives from other types of enterprises, this rationale being the sustainable development enhancing diversity of enterprise types. The locus of competition/competitiveness is shifting from financial performance to the normative capacity of enterprises to contribute to sustainable development. Co-operatives have a competitive advantage in this respect. This chapter will therefore suggest how to translate this capacity into the legal structure of co-operatives. It does so against the background of the economic, political, sociological, and socio-psychological changes and challenges, of which globalization is both cause and effect, and which impact the co-operative values and the notion of (co-operative) law and of law-making.


Author(s):  
Vladimir Yuryevich Samorodov

We present the study of the general scientific phenomenon of anticulture as a slice of social life and its reflection in the context of legal matter. The study of anticultural manifestations in the subject plane of modern Russian law-making, which are negative legal trends that affect the national legal life of society. We consider anticultural manifestations in law-making as the antithesis of the law-making culture, while attention is drawn to the dichotomy of the concepts of law-making culture and anticulture. Anticultural beginning in lawmaking is characterized as a negative trend of modern law-making. We outline the actual problem of these negative phenomena minimization (leveling), which in general can affect the quality and effectiveness of law-making. We carry out the analysis of law-making culture categories interrelation and anticulture by means of disclosure of essential characteristics of these concepts. The aim is to identify anticultural manifestations in law-making and develop measures to combat them. We apply methods of analysis, comparison, synthesis, modeling, and system research; also we present and characterize a number of anti-cultural manifestations in modern Russian law-making. In conclusion, we note that anticultural manifestations in law-making create prerequisites for the strengthening of negative phenomena in the national legal life that can affect its sustainable development, and therefore it is necessary to purposefully solve the problem of improving the culture of modern Russian law-making.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document