scholarly journals Barriers to Implementing Evidence-Based Practice in Critical Care: A Process Analysis Approach

Author(s):  
V.C. Rentes ◽  
E.R. Dibble ◽  
A.L. Ausmus ◽  
C.F. Haas ◽  
A. Weirauch ◽  
...  
2010 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 344-344
Author(s):  
Mypinder S. Sekhon ◽  
Donald E. G. Griesdale

2013 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Lincoln ◽  
Mary-Jeanne Manning ◽  
Susan Hamilton ◽  
Michelle Labreque ◽  
Denise Casey ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. e1-e7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annette M. Bourgault ◽  
Michele J. Upvall ◽  
Alison Graham

Background Tradition-based practices lack supporting research evidence and may be harmful or ineffective. Engagement of key stakeholders is a critical step toward facilitating evidence-based practice change. Gemba, derived from Japanese, refers to the real place where work is done. Gemba boards (visual management tools) appear to be an innovative method to engage stakeholders and facilitate evidence-based practice. Objectives To explore the use of gemba boards and gemba huddles to facilitate practice change. Methods Twenty-two critical care nurses participated in interviews in this qualitative, descriptive study. Thematic analysis was used to code and categorize interview data. Two researchers reached consensus on coding and derived themes. Data were managed with qualitative analysis software. Results The code gemba occurred most frequently; a secondary analysis was performed to explore its impact on practice change. Four themes were derived from the gemba code: (1) facilitation of staff, leadership, and interdisciplinary communication, (2) transparency of outcome data, (3) solicitation of staff ideas and feedback, and (4) dissemination of practice changes. Gemba boards and gemba huddles became part of the organizational culture for promoting and disseminating evidence-based practices. Conclusions Unit-based, publicly located gemba boards and huddles have become key components of evidence-based practice culture. Gemba is both a tool and a process to engage team members and the public to generate clinical questions and to plan, implement, and evaluate practice changes. Future research on the effectiveness of gemba boards to facilitate evidence-based practice is warranted.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aparna Sodhi ◽  
Marie Crandall

This review provides an overview of the elements of statistical analysis so that the reader may better understand the output of statistical studies, which is essential to the modern practice of critical care, in a rapidly evolving field. Beginning with hypothesis testing, the review progresses through an explanation of variable types and demonstrates how to quantify and categorize variables, with examples; it then goes on to explain the principles of basic comparative analysis, which helps identify simple differences between cohorts, and then highlights the importance of potential confounders to help readers understand simple strategies used to control for confounding, such as using different types of study designs and different methods of statistical analysis. By using contemporary, influential articles from the critical care literature to illustrate these principles, we hope to illuminate the importance of interpreting output from statistical studies to better inform evidence-based practice. Key words: confounding, hypothesis testing, statistical analysis


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document