AbstractTraditionally, it has been thought that the processing of binocular disparity for the perception of stereoscopic depth is accomplished via three types of disparity-selective channels – “near,” “far,” and “tuned.” More recent evidence challenges this notion. We have derived disparity-tuning functions psychophysically using a subthreshold summation (i.e. low-level masking) technique. We measured correlation-detection thresholds for dynamic random-element stereograms containing either one or two surfaces in depth. The resulting disparity-tuning functions show an opponent-type profile, indicating the presence of inhibition between disparity-tuned units in the visual system. Moreover, there is clear inhibition between disparities of the same sign, obviating a strict adherence to near-far opponency. These results compare favorably with tuning functions derived psychophysically using an adaptation technique, and with the tuning profiles from published single-unit recordings. Our results suggests a continuum of overlapping disparity-tuned channels, which is consistent with recent physiological evidence as well as models based on other psychophysical data.
Processing of first and second order binocular disparity by the human visual system
