scholarly journals Evaluating Surface Water Cycle Simulated by the Australian Community Land Surface Model (CABLE) across Different Spatial and Temporal Domains

2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 1119-1138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huqiang Zhang ◽  
Bernard Pak ◽  
Ying Ping Wang ◽  
Xinyao Zhou ◽  
Yongqiang Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Land Surface ◽  
Water Cycle ◽  
Land Surface Model ◽  
Surface Model ◽  
Model Parameters ◽  
Global Soil ◽  
Australian Community ◽  
Forest Regions ◽  
Terrestrial Water ◽  
Multimodel Ensembles

Abstract The terrestrial water cycle in the Australian Community Atmosphere Biosphere Land Exchange (CABLE) model has been evaluated across a range of temporal and spatial domains. A series of offline experiments were conducted using the forcing data from the second Global Soil Wetness Project (GSWP-2) for the period of 1986–95, but with its default parameter settings. Results were compared against GSWP-2 multimodel ensembles and a range of observationally driven datasets. CABLE-simulated global mean evapotranspiration (ET) and runoff agreed well with the GSWP-2 multimodel climatology and observations, and the spatial variations of ET and runoff across 150 large catchments were well captured. Nevertheless, at regional scales it underestimated ET in the tropics and had some significant runoff errors. The model sensitivity to a number of selected parameters is further examined. Results showed some significant model uncertainty caused by its sensitivity to soil wilting point as well as to the root water uptaking efficiency and canopy water storage parameters. The sensitivity was large in tropical rain forest and midlatitude forest regions, where the uncertainty caused by the model parameters was comparable to a large part of its difference against the GSWP-2 multimodel mean. Furthermore, the discrepancy among the CABLE perturbation experiments caused by its sensitivity to model parameters was equivalent to about 20%–40% of the intermodel difference among the GSWP-2 models, which was primarily caused by different model structure/processes. Although such results are model dependent, they suggest that soil/vegetation parameters could be another source of uncertainty in estimating global surface energy and water budgets.

scholarly journals Diagnosing hydrological limitations of a land surface model: application of JULES to a deep-groundwater chalk basin

2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 143-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Le Vine ◽  
A. Butler ◽  
N. McIntyre ◽  
C. Jackson
Keyword(s):  
Land Surface ◽  
Expert Knowledge ◽  
Water Cycle ◽  
Land Surface Model ◽  
Surface Model ◽  
Deep Groundwater ◽  
Resolution Model ◽  
Terrestrial Water ◽  
Water Redistribution ◽  
Types Of Information

Abstract. Land surface models (LSMs) are prospective starting points to develop a global hyper-resolution model of the terrestrial water, energy, and biogeochemical cycles. However, there are some fundamental limitations of LSMs related to how meaningfully hydrological fluxes and stores are represented. A diagnostic approach to model evaluation and improvement is taken here that exploits hydrological expert knowledge to detect LSM inadequacies through consideration of the major behavioural functions of a hydrological system: overall water balance, vertical water redistribution in the unsaturated zone, temporal water redistribution, and spatial water redistribution over the catchment's groundwater and surface-water systems. Three types of information are utilized to improve the model's hydrology: (a) observations, (b) information about expected response from regionalized data, and (c) information from an independent physics-based model. The study considers the JULES (Joint UK Land Environmental Simulator) LSM applied to a deep-groundwater chalk catchment in the UK. The diagnosed hydrological limitations and the proposed ways to address them are indicative of the challenges faced while transitioning to a global high resolution model of the water cycle.

scholarly journals Diagnosing hydrological limitations of a Land Surface Model: application of JULES to a deep-groundwater chalk basin

2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 7541-7582
Author(s):  
N. Le Vine ◽  
A. Butler ◽  
N. McIntyre ◽  
C. Jackson
Keyword(s):  
Land Surface ◽  
Expert Knowledge ◽  
Water Cycle ◽  
Land Surface Model ◽  
Surface Model ◽  
Deep Groundwater ◽  
Resolution Model ◽  
Terrestrial Water ◽  
Water Redistribution ◽  
Types Of Information

Abstract. Land Surface Models (LSMs) are prospective starting points to develop a global hyper-resolution model of the terrestrial water, energy and biogeochemical cycles. However, there are some fundamental limitations of LSMs related to how meaningfully hydrological fluxes and stores are represented. A diagnostic approach to model evaluation is taken here that exploits hydrological expert knowledge to detect LSM inadequacies through consideration of the major behavioural functions of a hydrological system: overall water balance, vertical water redistribution in the unsaturated zone, temporal water redistribution and spatial water redistribution over the catchment's groundwater and surface water systems. Three types of information are utilised to improve the model's hydrology: (a) observations, (b) information about expected response from regionalised data, and (c) information from an independent physics-based model. The study considers the JULES (Joint UK Land Environmental Simulator) LSM applied to a deep-groundwater chalk catchment in the UK. The diagnosed hydrological limitations and the proposed ways to address them are indicative of the challenges faced while transitioning to a global high resolution model of the water cycle.

scholarly journals Development and evaluation of 0.05° terrestrial water storage estimates using CABLE land surface model and GRACE data assimilation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natthachet Tangdamrongsub ◽  
Michael F. Jasinski ◽  
Peter Shellito
Keyword(s):  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Spatial Resolution ◽  
Land Surface ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
Land Surface Model ◽  
Surface Model ◽  
Model Parameters ◽  
Terrestrial Water Storage ◽  
Grace Data ◽  
Terrestrial Water

Abstract. Accurate estimation of terrestrial water storage (TWS) at a meaningful spatiotemporal resolution is important for reliable assessments of regional water resources and climate variability. Individual components of TWS include soil moisture, snow, groundwater, and canopy storage and can be estimated from the Community Atmosphere Biosphere Land Exchange (CABLE) land surface model. The spatial resolution of CABLE is currently limited to 0.5° by the resolution of soil and vegetation datasets that underlie model parameterizations, posing a challenge to using CABLE for hydrological applications at a local scale. This study aims to improve the spatial detail (from 0.5° to 0.05°) and timespan (1981–2012) of CABLE TWS estimates using rederived model parameters and high-resolution meteorological forcing. In addition, TWS observations derived from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellite mission are assimilated into CABLE to improve TWS accuracy. The success of the approach is demonstrated in Australia, where multiple ground observation networks are available for validation. The evaluation process is conducted using four different case studies that employ different model spatial resolutions and include or omit GRACE data assimilation (DA). We find that the CABLE 0.05° developed here improves TWS estimates in terms of accuracy, spatial resolution, and long-term water resource assessment reliability. The inclusion of GRACE DA increases the accuracy of groundwater storage (GWS) estimates and has little impact on surface soil moisture or evapotranspiration. The use of improved model parameters and improved state estimations (via GRACE DA) together is recommended to achieve the best GWS accuracy. The workflow elaborated in this paper relies only on publicly accessible global datasets, allowing reproduction of the 0.05° TWS estimates in any study region.

Water Cycle Extremes in the GRACE and GRACE-FO Data Record

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Rodell ◽  
Bailing Li
Keyword(s):  
Land Surface ◽  
Water Mass ◽  
Water Cycle ◽  
Land Surface Model ◽  
Surface Model ◽  
Drought Event ◽  
Terrestrial Water Storage ◽  
Data Record ◽  
Terrestrial Water ◽  
Hydrological Droughts

<p>A unique aspect of satellite gravimetry is its ability to quantify changes in all water stored at all depths on and beneath the land surface.  Hence, GRACE and GRACE-FO are well suited for quantifying both hydrological droughts, when terrestrial water storage (TWS) is low, and pluvial events, when TWS is high.  In this study we use GRACE and GRACE-FO data assimilation within a land surface model to fill the 1-year gap between the two missions and to replace other missing data.  We apply a cluster analysis approach to identify the locations and extents of TWS extreme events in resulting data record.  We then rank these events based on their intensity, i.e., the integral of the non-seasonal water mass anomaly over the period of the event.  In this presentation we report on the largest wet and dry events over each continent.  During the period of study, Africa, North America, and Australia each had a wet event with an intensity that exceeded 10,000 km<sup>3</sup> * month, although the 2010-2012 event in Australia can largely be attributed to a depressed baseline TWS during the period caused by the millennial drought.  With 30 more years of data it is probable that the intensity of that drought would have been greater than the recovery and wet event during 2010-2012.  As it stands, the biggest drought event was determined to be one occurred in South America during 2015-2016, with an intensity of over 10,000 km<sup>3</sup> * month.</p>

scholarly journals Development and evaluation of 0.05° terrestrial water storage estimates using Community Atmosphere Biosphere Land Exchange (CABLE) land surface model and assimilation of GRACE data

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (7) ◽  
pp. 4185-4208
Author(s):  
Natthachet Tangdamrongsub ◽  
Michael F. Jasinski ◽  
Peter J. Shellito
Keyword(s):  
Land Surface ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
Land Surface Model ◽  
Surface Model ◽  
Model Parameters ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Terrestrial Water Storage ◽  
Grace Data ◽  
Terrestrial Water ◽  
Land Exchange

Abstract. Accurate estimation of terrestrial water storage (TWS) at a high spatiotemporal resolution is important for reliable assessments of regional water resources and climate variability. Individual components of TWS include soil moisture, snow, groundwater, and canopy storage and can be estimated from the Community Atmosphere Biosphere Land Exchange (CABLE) land surface model. The spatial resolution of CABLE is currently limited to 0.5∘ by the resolution of soil and vegetation data sets that underlie model parameterizations, posing a challenge to using CABLE for hydrological applications at a local scale. This study aims to improve the spatial detail (from 0.5 to 0.05∘) and time span (1981–2012) of CABLE TWS estimates using rederived model parameters and high-resolution meteorological forcing. In addition, TWS observations derived from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellite mission are assimilated into CABLE to improve TWS accuracy. The success of the approach is demonstrated in Australia, where multiple ground observation networks are available for validation. The evaluation process is conducted using four different case studies that employ different model spatial resolutions and include or omit GRACE data assimilation (DA). We find that the CABLE 0.05∘ developed here improves TWS estimates in terms of accuracy, spatial resolution, and long-term water resource assessment reliability. The inclusion of GRACE DA increases the accuracy of groundwater storage (GWS) estimates and has little impact on surface soil moisture or evapotranspiration. Using improved model parameters and improved state estimations (via GRACE DA) together is recommended to achieve the best GWS accuracy. The workflow elaborated on in this paper relies only on publicly accessible global data sets, allowing the reproduction of the 0.05∘ TWS estimates in any study region.

scholarly journals Ensemble Evaluation of Hydrologically Enhanced Noah-LSM: Partitioning of the Water Balance in High-Resolution Simulations over the Little Washita River Experimental Watershed

2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrique Rosero ◽  
Lindsey E. Gulden ◽  
Zong-Liang Yang ◽  
Luis G. De Goncalves ◽  
Guo-Yue Niu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Table ◽  
Land Surface ◽  
Water Cycle ◽  
Land Surface Model ◽  
Surface Model ◽  
Model Parameters ◽  
Shallow Water Table ◽  
Total Runoff ◽  
Physically Based ◽  
Subsurface Runoff

Abstract The ability of two versions of the Noah land surface model (LSM) to simulate the water cycle of the Little Washita River experimental watershed is evaluated. One version that uses the standard hydrological parameterizations of Noah 2.7 (STD) is compared another version that replaces STD’s subsurface hydrology with a simple aquifer model and topography-related surface and subsurface runoff parameterizations (GW). Simulations on a distributed grid at fine resolution are compared to the long-term distribution of observed daily-mean runoff, the spatial statistics of observed soil moisture, and locally observed latent heat flux. The evaluation targets the typical behavior of ensembles of models that use realistic, near-optimal sets of parameters important to runoff. STD and GW overestimate the ratio of runoff to evapotranspiration. In the subset of STD and GW runs that best reproduce the timing and the volume of streamflow, the surface-to-subsurface runoff ratio is overestimated and simulated streamflow is much flashier than observations. Both models’ soil columns wet and dry too quickly, implying that there are structural shortcomings in the formulation of STD that cannot be overcome by adding GW’s increased complexity to the model. In its current formulation, GW extremely underestimates baseflow’s contribution to total runoff and requires a shallow water table to function realistically. In the catchment (depth to water table >10 m), GW functions as a simple bucket model. Because model parameters are likely scale and site dependent, the need for even “physically based” models to be extensively calibrated for all domains on which they are applied is underscored.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document