The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: Has the Gold Standard Become a Lead Weight?

2004 ◽  
Vol 161 (12) ◽  
pp. 2163-2177 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Michael Bagby ◽  
Andrew G. Ryder ◽  
Deborah R. Schuller ◽  
Margarita B. Marshall
2018 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik Vindbjerg ◽  
Guido Makransky ◽  
Erik Lykke Mortensen ◽  
Jessica Carlsson

Objective: The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) is considered the gold standard measure of depression. The factor structure of the HDRS is generally unstable, but 4 to 8 items appear to form a general depression factor. As transcultural studies of the HDRS have received little attention, and as most of the studies have taken a data-driven approach with a tendency to yield fragmented results, it is not clear if an HDRS general depression factor can also be found in non-Western populations. This is an important issue in deciding on the appropriateness of the scale as a gold standard in transcultural psychiatry. Method: A systematic review was carried out to compare previously reported factor structures of the HDRS in non-Western cultures. Overlapping clusters across studies were identified and subsequently tested with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of responses from an independent sample. Results: Fourteen relevant studies were identified, 12 of which were obtained. A general depression factor was identified, consisting of the following symptoms: depressed mood, guilt, loss of interests, retardation, suicide, and psychological anxiety. The subsequent CFA analysis supported the fit of this model. Conclusions: This study indicates that a general depression cluster is manifest in responses to the HDRS across cultures. While psychometric properties of the full-length HDRS are still debated, the general depression cluster appears pertinent to the assessment of depression across cultures. We recommend that cross-cultural clinicians and researchers focus on the use of unidimensional depression scales, which are in agreement with this cluster.


2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 141-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erita Istriana ◽  
Ade Kurnia ◽  
Annelies Weijers ◽  
Teddy Hidayat ◽  
Lucas Pinxten ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 305-311
Author(s):  
Tracy Hellem ◽  
Lindsay Scholl ◽  
Young-Hoon Sung ◽  
Hayden Ferguson ◽  
Erin McGlade ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvia Morbelli ◽  
Dario Arnaldi ◽  
Eugenia Cella ◽  
Stefano Raffa ◽  
Isabella Donegani ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose. Our aim was the head-to-head comparison between two automatic tools for semi-quantification of striatal dopamine transporter (DAT) specific-to-non displaceable (SBR) ratio brain SPECT values in a naturalistic cohort of patients. Procedures. We analyzed consecutive scans from one-hundred and fifty-one outpatients submitted to brain DAT SPECT for a suspected parkinsonism. Images were post-processed using a commercial (Datquant®) and a free (BasGanV2) software. Reading by expert was the gold-standard. A subset of patients with pathological or borderline scan was evaluated with the clinical Unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale, motor part (MDS-UPDRS-III). Results. SBR, putamen-to-caudate (P/C) ratio, and both P and C asymmetries were highly correlated between the two software with Pearson’s ‘r’ correlation coefficients ranging from .706 to .887. Correlation coefficients with the MDS-UPDRS III score were higher with caudate than with putamen SBR values with both software, and in general higher with BasGanV2 than with Datquant® . Datquant® correspondence with expert reading was 84.1% (94.0% by additionally considering the P/C ratio as a further index). BasGanV2 correspondence with expert reading was 80.8% (86.1% by additionally considering the P/C ratio). Conclusions. Both Datquant® and BasGanV2 work reasonably well and similarly one another in semi-quantification of DAT SPECT. Both tools have their own strength and pitfalls that must be known in detail by users in order to obtain the best help in visual reading and reporting of DAT SPECT.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 320-324
Author(s):  
A. Babirad

The aim of our study was to investigate the prevalence and severity of depression in patients with the consequences of ischemic strokes and in patients with chronic brain ischemia. Material and Methods. We examined 100 patients with consequences of ischemic strokes and 17 patients with chronic cerebral ischemia. The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale was used to assess the presence and degree of depression. Conclusions. Slightly less than half of the patients with chronic cerebral ischemia (47.1%) had no depression, 42.1% had mild depression, and only 11.8% of the patients had moderate and severe depression. A different situation was observed in the group of patients with the consequences of ischemic strokes. Among them, only 22.0% of patients had no depression, 44.0% had mild depression, and 34.0% of patients had moderate, severe, and extremely severe depression (p < 0.05).


2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Akdemir ◽  
M. H. Türkćapar ◽  
S. D. Őrsel ◽  
N. Demirergi ◽  
I. Dag ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document