Inconsistency in the Management of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: The Need for a Strict Protocol

2011 ◽  
Vol 77 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Theodoropoulos ◽  
Ari Brooks

As more therapies become available for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the management of patients with HCC is more complex, and the indications for the various therapeutic modalities are less clear. Although all of the treatment options have shown a certain efficacy in well-selected patient groups, their everyday use, especially in nonspecialized centers, is not always appropriate. We report our experience with 81 individuals who were diagnosed and treated in our institution between 2001 and 2007. Only patients who received transplants had good long-term outcomes, and we noted significant inconsistencies in the management of patients with similar stages of disease and degrees of cirrhosis. Despite recent progress, HCC still carries an overall dismal prognosis, making the optimization of the therapeutic plan mandatory to improve outcomes. We believe that a unified protocol, as well as the early involvement of the hepatology and transplant teams, can help physicians optimize the care of these patients.

BMJ ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. m3544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ju Dong Yang ◽  
Julie K Heimbach

ABSTRACT Hepatocellular carcinoma is one of the leading causes of cancer related death in the world. Biannual surveillance for the disease in patients with cirrhosis and in high risk carriers of hepatitis B virus allows early stage cancer detection and treatment with good long term outcomes. Liver ultrasonography and serum α fetoprotein are the most commonly used surveillance tests. If suspicious results are found on the surveillance test, multiphasic computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging should be undertaken to confirm the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. If radiologic tests show inconclusive results, liver biopsy or repeat imaging could be considered for confirmation of hepatocellular carcinoma. Management of the disease is complex. Patients should be evaluated by a multidisciplinary team, and the selection of treatment should consider factors such as tumor burden, severity of liver dysfunction, medical comorbidities, local expertise, and preference of patients. Early stage hepatocellular carcinoma is best managed by curative treatment, which includes resection, ablation, or transplantation. Patients with intermediate stage disease often receive locoregional treatment. Systemic treatment is reserved for patients with advanced disease. Several positive, phase III, randomized controlled trials have expanded the systemic treatment options for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with promising long term outcomes, especially trials using combination treatments, which could also have eventual implications for the treatment of earlier stage disease.


HPB ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. S146
Author(s):  
D. Kilburn ◽  
D. Cavallucci ◽  
U. Leung ◽  
M. Siriwardhane ◽  
R. Bryant ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (12) ◽  
pp. 3147-3152
Author(s):  
Helen J. Zhang ◽  
Nicole Silva ◽  
Elena Solli ◽  
Amanda C. Ayala ◽  
Luke Tomycz ◽  
...  

HPB ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. S366
Author(s):  
Kah Wai Lai ◽  
Jarrod Tan ◽  
Glenn Bonney ◽  
Iyer Shridhar ◽  
Krishnakumar Madhavan ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 433-438 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Sakata ◽  
Y. Shirai ◽  
T. Wakai ◽  
K. Kaneko ◽  
K. Hatakeyama

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (S4) ◽  
pp. 467-474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yukiyasu Okamura ◽  
Ryo Ashida ◽  
Yusuke Yamamoto ◽  
Takaaki Ito ◽  
Teiichi Sugiura ◽  
...  

Oncology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 90 (3) ◽  
pp. 167-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideo Kunimoto ◽  
Kenji Ikeda ◽  
Yushi Sorin ◽  
Shunichiro Fujiyama ◽  
Yusuke Kawamura ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document