Operative Intervention for Complete Pancreatic Transection in Children Sustaining Blunt Abdominal Trauma: Revisiting an Organ Salvage Technique

2011 ◽  
Vol 77 (5) ◽  
pp. 612-620 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew J. Borkon ◽  
Stephen E. Morrow ◽  
Elizabeth A. Koehler ◽  
Yu Shyr ◽  
Melissa A. Hilmes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Blunt Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
Pancreatic Injury ◽  
Pancreatic Tissue ◽  
Management Algorithm ◽  
Lengths Of Stay ◽  
Pancreatic Transection

Complete pancreatic transection (CPT) in children is managed commonly with distal pancreatectomy (DP). Alternatively, Roux-en-Y distal pancreaticojejunostomy (RYPJ) may be performed to preserve pancreatic tissue. The purpose of this study was to review our experience using either procedure in the management of children sustaining CPT after blunt abdominal trauma. We retrospectively reviewed the records of all children admitted to our institution during the last 15 years who were confirmed at operation to have CPT after blunt mechanisms. Summary statistics of demographic data were performed to describe children receiving either RYPJ or DP. CPT occurred in 28 children: 15 had DP, 10 had RYPJ, and three had cystogastrostomy. RYPJ children, compared with DP, were younger (7.5 vs 12.3 years, P = 0.039) and sustained more grade IV pancreatic injuries (70% vs 14%, P = 0.01). DP patients were 5.63 times more likely to tolerate full enteral feeds ( P = 0.009). Nevertheless, when controlling for age, injury severity score, and pancreatic injury grade, procedure type did not statistically affect total and postoperative lengths of stay and postoperative complications. In the operative management algorithm of children sustaining CPT, DP may afford an earlier return to full enteral feeds. RYPJ seems otherwise equivalent to DP and preserves significant pancreatic glandular tissue and the spleen.

scholarly journals Management of pediatric blunt abdominal trauma: تدبير رضوح البطن الكليلة عند الأطفال

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 27-20
Author(s):  
Wassem Ameer Shater, Mohammad Ali Nasser, Ali Mohammad Allou Wassem Ameer Shater, Mohammad Ali Nasser, Ali Mohammad Allou
Keyword(s):  
Operative Treatment ◽  
Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Blunt Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
Pancreatic Injury ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Abdominal Injuries ◽  
Non Operative Management

Aim of study: Evaluating a non- operative treatment of pediatric blunt abdominal trauma and avoiding unnecessary surgical intervention in Tishreen University Hospital. Methods: During years (2016- 2020) a retroprospective study was conducted on 62 children who had isolated blunt abdominal trauma or associated with other injuries, most of them were managed by non- operative treatment but some required surgical management. Results: Non- operative management of pediatric blunt abdominal injuries was applied for 59 patients, three patients required a surgical procedure, the spleen was the most organ exposed to injury (40) child, followed by liver (26) child, kidney (4) and (1) pancreatic injury. Non- operative management was successful in most solid organs injuries with grades 1, 2 and 3, but it failed in 5 grade splenic injury. one out of two hollow viscus injuries required surgical intervention. There were no statistical differences between the study groups in age, gender and injury mechanism. Hospital length of stay was significantly longer in patients who underwent a laparotomy (6) days compared to other non- operative patients (3) days, one complication occurred during non- operative management as pseudocyst after pancreatic injury, (4) patient died in the non- operative group due to hemodynamic instability and associated severe cerebral injuries. Conclusion: It is safe to treat most children with blunt abdominal injuries non- operatively if monitoring is adequate with hemodynamic stability.

scholarly journals Management modalities of isolated liver injury in blunt abdominal trauma

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 58
Author(s):  
Lalji Mangukiya ◽  
Hardik Astik
Keyword(s):  
Liver Injury ◽  
Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Blunt Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Road Traffic ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
Treatment Morbidity ◽  
Injury Grade ◽  
Isolated Liver

Background: The liver is one of the most commonly injured organ in blunt abdominal trauma. Management of liver injury due to blunt abdominal trauma has been dramatically evolved in recent years. Dramatic change from operative management to non-operative management has improved survival in these patients, becoming the standard of care for most liver injuries.Methods: A retrospective study of the patients admitted with the diagnosis of isolated liver injury due to blunt abdominal trauma between 2013-2018. Data collected of 30 patients of isolated liver injury who either treated conservative management of operative management. Variable analyzed included demographic data, mechanism of injury, associated injury, conservative treatment, operative treatment, morbidity, mortality, and hospital stay.Results: A total of 30 patients were analyzed of isolated liver injury due to blunt abdominal trauma, 27 patient sustained minor liver injury (grade I, II and III), whereas 3 patients had major liver injury (grade IV, V and VI). 25 cases due to road traffic accident and 5 cases were due to falls from a height. 27 patients with American Association for the surgery of trauma grade I, II, III and 2 patients with grade IV, V managed conservatively, surgical intervention required in 1 patient with grade V, mortality occurred in 1 patient out of 29 who were treated conservatively.Conclusions: Isolated liver injury is common in the blunt abdominal trauma patient. Most of the patients with the liver injury with hemodynamically stable treated conservatively. Only a few of them require surgical management if they are hemodynamically unstable.

scholarly journals Traumatic Liver Injury in Hong Kong: The Management Strategy and Outcome

2009 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 208-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
CN Chong ◽  
YS Cheung ◽  
KF Lee ◽  
TH Rainer ◽  
BSP Lai
Keyword(s):  
Hong Kong ◽  
Liver Injury ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Road Traffic ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
Concomitant Injuries ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Non Operative Management

Introduction Management of liver injury is challenging and evolving. The aim of this article is to review the outcome of traumatic liver injury in Chinese people in Hong Kong. Materials & methods Records of 40 patients with hepatic injury who received treatment at the Prince of Wales Hospital between December 2000 and May 2005 were reviewed. Demographic data, severity of liver injury, Injury Severity Score (ISS), haemodynamic status and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score on admission, investigations made, concomitant injuries, management scheme, and outcome of patients were analysed. Results There were 23 male and 17 female patients with a mean age of 31.3 (SD=15.4) years. Road traffic accident was the most common injury mechanism (65%). Half of the patients were treated by non-operative management (NOM). None of them required surgery during subsequent management. Patients in the operative management (OM) group had a significantly higher ISS (p=0.026), but there was no significant difference in the mortality rate between the OM and NOM groups. Patients with stable haemodynamic status and who were treated non-operatively had a significantly shorter hospital stay (p=0.006). High grade liver injury (OR=8.0, 95% CI=1.2 to 53.8, p=0.03) and ISS greater than 25 (OR=21.6, 95% CI=2.0 to 225.3, p=0.01) were independent risk factors for mortality on multivariate analysis. Conclusions Non-operative management of liver injury can be safely accomplished in haemodynamically stable patients, with the possible benefit of a shorter hospital stay.

scholarly journals SPECTRUM AND OUTCOME OF BLUNT ABDOMINAL TRAUMA

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahesh Kumar Sharma ◽  
Dr. Arun Bhargava
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Blunt Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Traffic Accident ◽  
Traffic Accidents ◽  
Splenic Injury ◽  
Road Traffic ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
Fall From Height ◽  
Type Of Injury

Background: Blunt abdominal trauma is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among all age groups. So we evaluate the spectrum and outcome of blunt trauma. Methods: Hospital based prospective study conducted on 100 patients at department of general surgery. Results: Distribution according to type of injury consisted of maximum cases, 84 (84%) of road traffic accidents, 11% cases were of fall from height. Conclusions: Males were pre-dominantly affected. Road traffic accident was the most common cause of injury. Though conservative management is successful in carefully selected patients, operative management remains the main stay of treatment. Keywords: Blunt abdominal trauma, Liver injury, Perforation, Splenic injury

scholarly journals Non-operative Management of Blunt abdominal trauma in a Tertiary Care Hospital of Nepal

2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Ghimire ◽  
N Yogi ◽  
P Ghimire
Keyword(s):  
Teaching Hospital ◽  
Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Blunt Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
Bowel Injury ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Failure Group ◽  
Management Group ◽  
Clinical Instability ◽  
Non Operative Management

Background: To assess the feasibility of Non-operative management of Blunt abdominal trauma in a teaching hospital of Nepal. Methods: A prospective observational study was carried out over a period of 3 years including 52 cases of blunt abdominal trauma in a teaching hospital in western part of Nepal. Patient and trauma characteristics of the cases, different modalities of treatment and outcomes were evaluated. All the cases were divided in 3 groups: Operative group, Non-Operative Management and Non-Operative Failure group. Operative group and non-operative management group were compared using Fischer Exact Test for categorical variable and student’s “t” test for continuous variable. Results: There were 36% of cases in operative group, 61% in non-operative management group and 2% in non-operative management failure group. Non-operative management was successful in 97% of cases. Injury severity score, admission hematocrit and hemodynamic status were significantly different between non-operative management and Operative group. Non-operative management failure occurred in 1 case and was secondary to delayed hepatic hemorrhage. Conclusion: Non-operative management of Blunt abdominal trauma can be attempted with high degree of success. Hemodynamic and clinical instability rather than severity of the organ injury is the predictor of failure in non-operative management. Spleen and bowel injury are the most common organ that usually land up in operative group because of hemodynamic instability in splenic injury and peritoneal contamination in bowel injury. Close surveillance in an intensive care unit is always desirable. Nepal Journal of Medical Sciences | Volume 02 | Number 01 | Jan-Jun 2013 | Page 38-41 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/njms.v2i1.7650

Pancreatic Injury from Blunt Abdominal Trauma in Childhood

2005 ◽  
Vol 105 (3) ◽  
pp. 283-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Ruszinkó ◽  
P. Willner ◽  
A. Oláh
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Blunt Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Pancreatic Injury

scholarly journals Isolated free fluid on computed tomography for blunt abdominal trauma

2019 ◽  
Vol 101 (8) ◽  
pp. 552-557
Author(s):  
W Bekker ◽  
MTD Smith ◽  
VY Kong ◽  
JL Bruce ◽  
G Laing ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Blunt Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Splenic Injury ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
Bladder Injury ◽  
Free Fluid ◽  
Abdominal Ct ◽  
Hollow Viscus ◽  
Hollow Viscus Injury ◽  
Non Operative Management

Introduction The clinical significance of isolated free fluid on abdominal computed tomography (CT) in patients with blunt abdominal trauma is unclear. This audit reviews our unit’s experience with isolated free fluid and attempts to refine our clinical algorithms for the assessment of patients with blunt abdominal trauma. Materials and methods All patients who sustained blunt abdominal trauma between December 2012 and December 2017 who were subjected to multidetector CT of the abdomen as part of their initial investigation were included in this study. Results During the five-year period under review, a total of 1066 patients underwent abdominal CT following blunt poly trauma. A total of 84 (7.9%) patients died. There were 148 (14%) patients with CT finding of isolated free fluid. Of these, 128 (67%) were selected for non-operative management, which included a period of serial abdominal examinations. In this non-operative group, five patients failed their abdominal observations and underwent laparotomy. Findings in these five cases were negative (1), non-therapeutic (1), splenic injury (1), Pancreatic and splenic injury (1) and bladder injury (1). Thirteen patients (10%) died, none of whom had surgery. The causes of death were exsanguination from a major traumatic lower limb injury (1), multiple organ failure (1), traumatic brain injury (10) and spinal cord injury (1). The remaining 20 patients underwent laparotomy. The indications were failed non-operative management (5), abdominal distension (1) and suspicion of a missed hollow viscus injury (14). In this group there were 11 therapeutic and 6 non-therapeutic surgeries and three negative laparotomies. For the 15 patients selected for operative management, the findings were as follows: hollow viscus injury (3), mesenteric bleeds (2), splenic and pancreatic injury (1), liver and bladder injury (1), splenic and bladder injury (1), non-therapeutic (4), negative (3). The finding of isolated free fluid on CT is 98% sensitive and 96% specific for true isolated free fluid (chi square 331.598; P = 0.000). This finding predicts successful non-operative management with a positive predictive value of 93% and a negative predictive value of 96%. Discussion In patients with blunt abdominal trauma, the finding of isolated free fluid on abdominal CT alone is no longer an indication for laparotomy. Other clinical factors must be taken into account when deciding on the need for laparotomy, such as haemodynamic status, clinical abdominal findings and the ability to reliably assess the abdomen. In the absence of a clinical indication for urgent laparotomy, patients with isolated free fluid may be observed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document