scholarly journals Application of Subcutaneous Talc in Hernia Repair and Wide Subcutaneous Dissection Dramatically Reduces Seroma Formation and Post-Operative Wound Complications

2014 ◽  
Vol 80 (4) ◽  
pp. 422-422
Author(s):  
David A. Klima ◽  
Rita A Brintzenhoff ◽  
Victor B. Tsirline ◽  
Igor Belyansky ◽  
Amy E. Lincourt ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-103
Author(s):  
Md Fardhus ◽  
AMSM Sharfuzzaman ◽  
Md Nayeem Dewan ◽  
Md Abul Hossain ◽  
Ahmed Sami Al Hasan ◽  
...  

Aim: To compare Desarda’s versus Lichtenstein’s mesh repair in patients with unilateral, primary, reducible inguinal hernia in terms of mean operative time and seroma formation Methods: This randomized control trial conducted at Department of Surgery, Patuakhali Medical College & Hospital, Patuakhali. Eighty patients with unilateral, primary, reducible inguinal hernia were randomly distributed into two groups to undergo hernia repair i.e. Lichtenstein (L) and Desarda’s (D). Outcome was measured in terms of mean operative time and seroma formation. Seroma formation was defined as presence of enclosed cavity containing serous fluid determined by ultrasonography at 30th post-operative day. Results: Thirty three patients (41.25%) were above 50 years of age, whereas remaining 47 patients (58.75%) were below 50 years of age. Five patients (6.25%) were female and 75 patients(93.75%) were male. Seroma formation was 5% in Desarda’s group while 7.5% in Lichtenstein group (P> 0.05). Similarly difference in mean operative time was statistically non-significant. Seroma formation was common in older age group. There was no effect of smoking, obesity, operative time and gender on seroma formation. Conclusion: It is concluded that there is no difference in frequency of seroma formation and mean operative time in Desarda’s or Lichtenstein’s technique of hernia repair. Journal of Surgical Sciences (2018) Vol. 22 (2) : 99-103


2014 ◽  
Vol 38 (11) ◽  
pp. 2797-2803 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gernot Köhler ◽  
Oliver Owen Koch ◽  
Stavros A. Antoniou ◽  
Michael Lechner ◽  
Franz Mayer ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (9) ◽  
pp. 2870-2872
Author(s):  
Erum Memon ◽  
Kiran Batool ◽  
Mubashra Samina ◽  
Sana Ashfaq ◽  
Kaniz Zehra Naqvi

Objective: To evaluate the postoperative abdominal wound problem after hysterectomy with scalpel versus electrocautery for skin and subcutaneous dissection. Material and Methods: A total of 516 post-menopausal women having age 40 to 65 years who were planned for elective hysterectomy were included in this study. Patients having only benign disorders were included. In group E (N=258); Skin incision and tissue dissection was done using electrocautery by setting the electrocautery machine at cutting mode at 30 to 50 watts’ power. In group S (N=258); conventional scalpel was used for skin incision. Scalpel number 23 was used for skin and subcutaneous tissue dissection. Post-operative wound complications such as seroma, hematoma, wound dehiscence and wound infections were primary study endpoints. Results: Mean age was 48.6±6.9 years in electrocautery and 49.2±6.3 years in scalpel group (p-value 0.30). Seroma formation was diagnosed in 98 (37.98%) patients in electrocautery group and in 52 (20.1%) patients in scalpel group (p-value <0.0001). Wound infections were diagnosed in 50 (19.3%) patients in electrocautery group versus in 87 (33.7%) patients in scalpel group (p-value 0.0002). Hematoma was diagnosed in 10 (3.87%) patients in electrocautery group and in 19 (7.4%) in scalpel group (p-value 0.08). Conclusion: The use of electrocautery is associated with lower rate of post-operative wound infections and hematoma formation. The present study advocates the use of electrocautery for skin and subcutaneous tissue dissection in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. Keywords: Abdominal hysterectomy, electrocautery, scalpel, wound complications.


2014 ◽  
Vol 186 (2) ◽  
pp. 673
Author(s):  
B.R. Englum ◽  
P.J. Speicher ◽  
A.M. Ganapathi ◽  
J.E. Scarborough

2018 ◽  
Vol 227 (4) ◽  
pp. e136
Author(s):  
Hemasat Alkhatib ◽  
Luciano Tastaldi ◽  
Clayton C. Petro ◽  
Dominykas Burneikis ◽  
David Krpata ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 81 (8) ◽  
pp. 778-785 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel W. Ross ◽  
Bindhu Oommen ◽  
Ciara Huntington ◽  
Amanda L. Walters ◽  
Amy E. Lincourt ◽  
...  

Modern adjuncts to complex, open ventral hernia repair often include component separation (CS) and/or panniculectomy (PAN). This study examines nationwide data to determine how these techniques impact postoperative complications. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried from 2005 to 2013 for inpatient, elective open ventral hernia repairs (OVHR). Cases were grouped by the need for and type of concomitant advancement flaps: OVHR alone (OVHRA), OVHR with CS, OVHR with panniculectomy (PAN), or both CS and PAN (BOTH). Multivariate regression to control for confounding factors was conducted. There were 58,845 OVHR: 51,494 OVHRA, 5,357 CS, 1,617 PAN, and 377 BOTH. Wound complications (OVHRA 8.2%, CS 12.8%, PAN 14.4%, BOTH 17.5%), general complications (15.2%, 24.9%, 25.2%, 31.6%), and major complications (6.9%, 11.4%, 7.2%, 13.5%) were different between groups ( P < 0.0001). There was no difference in mortality. Multivariate regression showed CS had higher odds of wound [odds ratio (OR) 1.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5–2.0], general (OR 1.5, 95% CI: 1.3–1.8), and major complications (OR 2.1, 95%, CI: 1.8–2.4), and longer length of stay by 2.3 days. PAN had higher odds of wound (OR 1.5, 95%, CI: 1.3–1.8) and general complications (OR 1.7, 95% CI: 1.5–2.0). Both CS and PAN had higher odds of wound (OR 2.2,95%, CI: 1.5–3.2), general (OR 2.5, 95%, CI: 1.8–3.4), and major complications (OR 2.2, 95%CI: 1.4–3.4), and two days longer length of stay. In conclusion, patients undergoing OVHR that require CS or PAN have a higher independent risk of complications, which increases when the procedures are combined.


2016 ◽  
pp. bcr2016215034 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Mohamed ◽  
Adel Elmoghrabi ◽  
William Reid Shepard ◽  
Michael McCann

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document