scholarly journals Carotid Revascularization Procedural Volume and Perioperative Outcomes

Angiology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 000331972110056
Author(s):  
Kosmas I. Paraskevas ◽  
Richard P. Cambria
Angiology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 000331972199171
Author(s):  
Mary Giurgius ◽  
Marco Horn ◽  
Shannon D. Thomas ◽  
Mehdi H. Shishehbor ◽  
C. Barry Beiles ◽  
...  

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) prevent stroke in selected patients. However, each intervention carries a risk of perioperative complications including stroke or death (S/D). We aimed to determine the relationship between operator volume, hospital volume, and the perioperative risk of S/D in carotid revascularization in Australia and New Zealand. Retrospective analysis was performed on prospectively collected data extracted from the Australasian Vascular Audit between 2010 and 2017. Annual caseload volume was analyzed in quintiles (Q) using multivariate regression to assess its impact on perioperative S/D. Carotid endarterectomy procedures (n = 16 765) demonstrated higher S/D rates for lower-volume operators (2.21% for Q1-Q3 [1-17 annual cases] vs 1.76% for Q4-Q5 [18-61 annual cases]; odds ratio [OR]: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.001-1.64; P = .049). Carotid artery stenting procedures (n = 1350) also demonstrated higher S/D rates for lower-volume operators (2.63% for Q1-Q3 [1-11 annual cases] vs 0.37% for Q4-Q5 [12-31 annual cases]; OR: 6.11; 95% CI: 1.27-29.33; P = .024). No significant hospital volume-outcome effect was observed for either procedure. An inverse relationship was demonstrated between operator volume and perioperative S/D rates following CEA and CAS. Consideration of minimum operator thresholds, restructuring of services and networked referral pathways of care in Australia and New Zealand, would likely result in improved patient outcomes.


Author(s):  
Christina Cui ◽  
Kevin Yei ◽  
Claire Janssen ◽  
Mokhshan Ramachandran ◽  
Jeffrey Siracuse ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 204 (2) ◽  
pp. 267-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Besma Nejim ◽  
Tammam Obeid ◽  
Isibor Arhuidese ◽  
Caitlin Hicks ◽  
Sophie Wang ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Christopher A. Latz ◽  
Laura T. Boitano ◽  
Linda J. Wang ◽  
Charles DeCarlo ◽  
Anna A. Pendleton ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 231 (4) ◽  
pp. e267-e268
Author(s):  
Christina Cui ◽  
Isaac N. Naazie ◽  
Asma Mathlouthi ◽  
Hanaa Dakour-Aridi ◽  
Mahmoud Malas

2020 ◽  
Vol 231 (4) ◽  
pp. e266
Author(s):  
Christopher A. Latz ◽  
Laura Boitano ◽  
Linda Wang ◽  
Charles DeCarlo ◽  
Anna Alaska Pendleton ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. e201-e202
Author(s):  
Christopher A. Latz ◽  
Laura T. Boitano ◽  
Linda J. Wang ◽  
Charles DeCarlo ◽  
Anna A. Pendleton ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (7) ◽  
pp. 1963-1972 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdullah S. Rasheed ◽  
Robert S. White ◽  
Virginia Tangel ◽  
Bess M. Storch ◽  
Kane O. Pryor

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 334-344
Author(s):  
Damianos G. Kokkinidis ◽  
Nikos Chaitidis ◽  
Stefanos Giannopoulos ◽  
Pavlos Texakalidis ◽  
Moosa N. Haider ◽  
...  

Purpose: To investigate the prognostic role of contralateral carotid artery occlusion (CCO) in perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing carotid artery endarterectomy (CEA) vs carotid artery stenting (CAS). Materials and Methods: The PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were searched up to September 2018 to identify observational or randomized studies that compared outcomes of carotid revascularization in patients with vs without CCO. Forty-three studies (46 arms) comprising 96,658 patients were selected (75,857 CEA and 20,801 CAS). The CCO group included 9258 patients. Heterogeneity was assessed with the Higgins I2 test. I2>75% indicated significant heterogeneity. A random effects model was used to account for heterogeneity among studies. The results were reported as the odds ratios (ORs) with the 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Meta-regression analysis examined potential confounders. Publication bias was quantified by the Egger method. Results: Carotid revascularization in patients with CCO was associated with an increased risk of 30-day mortality (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.38 to 2.23, p<0.001; I2=0%), stroke (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.41 to 2.22, p<0.001; I2=46%), transient ischemic attack (TIA) (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.34 to 3.27, p=0.001; I2=15%), and the composite endpoint of stroke/death (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.54 to 2.05, p<0.001; I2=0%). No difference was noted in the risk of perioperative myocardial infarction (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.31; p=0.388; I2=0%). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that CEA in patients with CCO was associated with an increased risk of stroke (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.72 to 2.49, p<0.001; I2=14%), death (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.55 to 2.10, p<0.001; I2=0%), TIA (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.38 to 3.45, p<0.001; I2=13%), and stroke/death (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.55 to 2.10, p<0.001; I2=0%), whereas CCO patients who were treated with CAS were at an increased risk for death (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.60, p=0.023; I2=0%) but not stroke (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.47; p=0.080; I2=31%) or TIA (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.18 to 7.55; p=0.861; I2=43%). The meta-regression analysis did not find any significant association for any of the outcomes, and there was no evidence of publication bias. Conclusion: Carotid revascularization outcomes are adversely affected by the presence of CCO. Patients with CCO have a significantly higher risk of periprocedural stroke, death, and TIA. CEA in patients with CCO is associated with an increased risk of perioperative stroke, death, TIA, and death/stroke, while CAS in the presence of a CCO is associated with an increased risk of periprocedural death but not stroke or TIA.


Author(s):  
James J. Drinane ◽  
Brian Drolet ◽  
Ashit Patel ◽  
Joseph A. Ricci

Abstract Introduction Fellowship-trained hand surgeons may have residency training in either orthopedic, plastic, or general surgery, generating significant variability in education background. To study the effect of different training backgrounds on practice pattern variations, we utilized the NSQIP (National Surgical Quality Improvement Database) database to assess hand surgery volumes and case variety by specialty. Materials and Methods NSQIP years 2008 to 2017 was queried with hand surgery current procedural terminology codes defined by the American Board of Orthopedic Surgery. Procedures were grouped according to type and specialty, and relative rates calculated. Hand society membership data were used to determine if procedural volume for each specialty in each category and overall contribution to the volume of hand surgery performed nationally was distributed in accordance with membership data. Results A total of 145,015 hand surgeries were performed; 13,267 (9.1%) by general surgeons, 28,402 (19.6%) by plastic surgeons, and 103,346 (71.3%) by orthopedic surgeons. Orthopedic surgeons performed significantly more bone, fracture, joint, and tendon cases. General surgeons and plastic surgeons performed higher than expected numbers of soft tissue coverage and cases overall with respective excesses of 183 and 22%. Conclusion Hand surgery is an available fellowship pathway from multiple residencies. Fellowship training does not level the field of real-world practice patterns. Residency training experiences significantly impact practice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document