Periprocedural Management During Stroke Thrombectomy

Purpose of ReviewEndovascular therapy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke caused by large vessel occlusion is a powerful and evidence-based tool to achieve reperfusion and results in improved neurologic outcome. Focus has now shifted toward optimizing the procedure. We reviewed the relevant current literature on periprocedural stroke care such as pretreatment with IV tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), choice of anesthesia, ventilation strategy, and blood pressure management.Recent FindingsIV tPA should not be withheld in a patients with stroke eligible for EVT. A meta-analysis of randomized trials on general anesthesia (GA) vs procedural sedation has shown better neurologic outcomes with protocol-based GA in centers with dedicated neuroanesthesia teams. There are no data from randomized trials on blood pressure control, but according to available evidence, systolic blood pressure should probably be held at >140 mm Hg during the procedure and <160 mm Hg after reperfusion. In ventilated patients, extreme deviations from normoxemia and normocapnia should be avoided.SummaryPeriprocedural care influences the outcome after EVT for large vessel ischemic stroke. More evidence from prospective ongoing and future studies is urgently needed to identify its optimization.

Manual Thrombus Aspiration and its Procedural Stroke Risk in Myocardial Infarction

Background The previous large‐scale randomized controlled trial showed that routine thrombus aspiration (TA) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was associated with an increased risk of stroke. However, real‐world clinical evidence is still limited. Methods and Results We investigated the association between manual TA and stroke risk during primary PCI in the OACIS (Osaka Acute Coronary Insufficiency Study) database (N=12 093). The OACIS is a prospective, multicenter registry of myocardial infarction. The primary end point of the present study is stroke at 7 days. A total of 9147 patients who underwent primary PCI within 24 hours of hospitalization were finally analyzed (TA group, n=4448, versus non‐TA group, n=4699 patients). TA was independently associated with risk of stroke at 7 days (odds ratio [OR], 1.92 [95% CI, 1.19‒3.12]; P =0.008) in the simple logistic regression model, while the multilevel random effects logistic regression model with hospital treated as a random effect showed that manual TA was not associated with incremental risk of stroke at 7 days (OR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.71‒1.16]; P =0.435). The 7‐day stroke risk of manual TA was significantly heterogeneous in different institutions ( P for interaction =0.007). Conclusions Manual TA during primary PCI for patients with acute myocardial infarction was independently associated with the overall increased risk of periprocedural stroke. However, this result was substantially skewed because of institution specific risk variation, suggesting that the periprocedural stroke may be preventable by prudent PCI procedure or appropriate periprocedural management. Registration URL: https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi‐open‐bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000005464 . Unique identifier: UMIN000004575.

Accession Site Does Not Influence the Risk of Stroke after Diagnostic Coronary Angiography or Intervention: Results from a Large Prospective Registry

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Periprocedural stroke represents a rare but serious complication of cardiac catheterization. Pooled data from randomized trials evaluating the risk of stroke following cardiac catheterization via transradial versus transfemoral access showed no difference. On the other hand, a significant difference in stroke rates favoring transradial access was found in a recent meta-analysis of observational studies. Our aim was to determine if there is a difference in stroke risk after transradial versus transfemoral catheterization within a contemporary real-world registry. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Data from 14,139 patients included in a single-center prospective registry between 2009 and 2016 were used to determine the odds of periprocedural transient ischemic attack (TIA) and stroke for radial versus femoral catheterization via multivariate logistic regression with Firth’s correction. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 10,931 patients underwent transradial and 3,208 underwent transfemoral catheterization. Periprocedural TIA/stroke occurred in 41 (0.29%) patients. Age was the only significant predictor of TIA/stroke in multivariate analysis, with each additional year representing an odds ratio (OR) = 1.09 (CI 1.05–1.13, <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.000). The choice of accession site had no impact on the risk of periprocedural TIA/stroke (OR = 0.81; CI 0.38–1.72, <i>p</i> = 0.577). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Observational data from a large prospective registry indicate that accession site has no influence on the risk of periprocedural TIA/stroke after cardiac catheterization.

Frequency and predictors of coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention related stroke

Background Acute stroke related to percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) is an infrequent complication, although potentially life-threatening and often leading to serious disability, characterised by high morbidity and mortality rate. However, particular data on periprocedural complications, predictors, prognosis and the type of coronary intervention has not yet been adequately investigated. Aim The aim of the present study was to assess the relationship between the type of coronary procedure [coronary angiography (CA) and PCI] and incidence of stroke as well as predictors of stroke. Material and methods This retrospective analysis was performed on prospectively collected data gathered in the Polish National Registry of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (ORPKI), which covered the period between January 2014 and December 2019 and included 1,177,161 coronary procedures. Among them, 650,674 patients underwent isolated CA and 526,487 underwent PCI. Stroke was diagnosed in 157 patients (0.013%), of which 100 (0.015%) refers to patients admitted for CA and 57 (0.011%) in patients qualified for PCI. Subsequently, the mentioned groups were analysed for similarities and compared. Multivariate analysis was performed to separate predictors of stroke in patients undergoing coronary angiography and PCI. Results The amount of patients with periprocedural stroke was higher in a group treated with isolated CA during the analysed time. The mean age of the patients, who developed cerebral stroke, was significantly higher in the overall group (71.4±10.6 vs. 66.7±10.8; p&lt;0.001). Patients with stroke, in comparison to non-stroke group, were treated more often from femoral access for CA (p&lt;0.001) and PCI (p=0.04), they had a history of prior stroke for CA (p&lt;0.001) and PCI (p&lt;0.001) more often, and acute myocardial infarction at admission for CA (p&lt;0.001) and PCI (p=0.01). They were also more frequently transported directly to the catheterisation laboratory for CA (p&lt;0.001) and PCI (p=0.002). Predictors of periprocedural stroke, assessed by multivariate analysis for CA, are presented at Fig. 1 and for PCI at Fig. 2. Conclusions Based on the large national registry, PCI is associated with fewer risk factors and lower rate of periprocedural strokes than isolated CA. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Figure 1 Figure 2

Left Atrial Spontaneous Echo Contrast and Ischemic Stroke in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure

Objectives: Spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) in the left atrium (LA) is frequently observed in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients and may lead to thromboembolic events. We aimed to investigate both periprocedural and long-term stroke risks associated with LA SEC in AF patients undergoing percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC).Methods: A total of 408 consecutive AF patients treated with LAAC between March 2015 and February 2019 were divided into two groups based on preprocedural transesophageal echocardiography: the study group (moderate/severe LA SEC; n = 41) and the control group (none, mild, or mild to moderate LA SEC; n = 367). To attenuate the observed imbalance in baseline covariates, a propensity score matching technique was used.Results: No periprocedural stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) was documented. The incidence of device-related thrombus was higher in the study group than in the control group (8.8 vs. 1.3%; P = 0.025). The mean follow-up period was 3.2 ± 1.1 years, during which 8 patients (2.2%) in the control group and 4 (9.8%) in the study group experienced stroke/TIA (P = 0.024). Moderate/severe LA SEC was identified as an independent predictor of stroke/TIA in both the original population (HR = 5.71, 95% CI 1.47–22.19, P = 0.012) and the matched population (HR = 9.79, 95% CI 1.44–66.86, P = 0.020).Conclusions: LA SEC did not show a relationship with periprocedural stroke events in patients undergoing percutaneous LAAC. However, moderate/severe LA SEC increased the incidence of device-related thrombus and the risk of late stroke/TIA.

Neurological Complications of Cardiac Procedures

Neurological complications after cardiac surgery and percutaneous cardiac interventions are not uncommon. These include periprocedural stroke, postoperative cognitive dysfunction after cardiac surgery, contrast-induced encephalopathy after percutaneous interventions, and seizures. In this article, we review the incidence, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of these complications. Improved understanding of these complications could lead to their prevention, faster detection, and facilitation of diagnostic workup and appropriate treatment.

Aspiration Thrombectomy in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction—5-Year Analysis Based on a Large National Registry (ORPKI)

Blood flow restoration after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) may not always be achieved and could be complicated by the no-reflow phenomenon (NRP). The aim of the current study was to assess the frequency of thrombus aspirations (TAs) and NRPs in patients with AMI and treated with pPCI based on the data collected during a 5-year period in the national ORPKI registry, as well as the frequency of periprocedural strokes and predictors of TA and NRP. This retrospective analysis was performed on prospectively collected data gathered in the Polish National Registry of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (ORPKI), which covered the period between January 2014 and December 2018, and included 200,991 patients treated due to AMI out of 535,857 patients treated using PCI. Among them, 16,777 patients underwent TA. TA was mainly used in the STEMI subgroup of 14,207 patients (84.8%). The frequency of NRP among AMI patients in the thrombectomy group was 2.75% and in the non-thrombectomy group 0.82%. Predictors of TA and NRP were also assessed using multivariate analysis. The percentage of patients treated with pPCI and with PCI alone increased significantly in all of the three selected groups of patients from 88.7% to 94.3% in the AMI group (p < 0.001), from 82.3% to 90.3% in the STEMI subgroup (p < 0.001), and from 96.3% to 98.2% in the NSTEMI subgroup (p < 0.001) during the analysed period. NRP occurred more often in the thrombectomy group for the NSTEMI (0.58% vs. 3.07%, p < 0.05) and STEMI (1.06% vs. 2.69%, p < 0.05) subgroups. Periprocedural stroke occurred more often in the thrombectomy group in comparison to the non-thrombectomy group with AMI (0.03% vs. 0.01%, p < 0.05) and the NSTEMI (0.16% vs. 0.02%, p < 0.05). In conclusion, the frequency of TA has been experiencing a steady decline in recent years, regardless of AMI type, among patients treated with pPCI.

Save your brain – does the sentinel cerebral protection device work?

Background Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is increasingly used for the treatment of severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS), also in low-risk patients. Periprocedural embolic stroke is rare, but potentially associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Thus, there is great interest in preventing any cerebral embolic event. At present, only one cerebral embolic protection systems (CPS) is commercially available and little is known about its efficacy in preventing stroke during TAVI. The Sentinel CPS is a FDA-approved system consisting of two inter-connected filters that are placed in the brachiocephalic trunk and the left carotid artery via the right radial artery. Material and methods Consecutive patients undergoing TAVI between 11/2018 and 11/2019 were enrolled. Consecutive patients treated by one operator received the Sentinel device, if anatomically possible. Periprocedural stroke rate, as defined by VARC2-criteria, and mortality up to 7 days after procedure was assessed. Descriptive statistics was performed to identify baseline variables associated with elevated risk of stroke and Cox-regression analysis was used to investigate its influence on outcome. Results 268 patients (47.4% female, 81±7 years) were included. In 74 patients (27.6%), a Sentinel CPS was used, in 63 (23.5%) it was positioned correctly in the brachiocephalic trunk and left carotid artery. Only these patients were considered Sentinel-protected. Patients with and without Sentinel presented with similar baseline characteristics with regard to age (no CPS vs CPS; 80.3 vs 81.5 years; p=0.233), sex (female 47.3% vs 47.7%; p=0.967), previous stroke (6.9% vs 3.2%; p=0.373), peripheral artery disease (9.8% vs 4.8%; p=0.305), coronary artery disease (63.1% vs 57.1%; p=0.370), and kidney function (GFR 52 vs 56 ml/min/m2; p=0.283). The EuroScore II (6% vs 6%; p=0.937), periprocedural predilation (48.3% vs 47.6; p=0.925), postdilation (29.3% vs 31.7%; p=0.707) and procedure time (59min vs 66min; p=0.152) were not different. In total, 15 strokes (5.6%) occurred, of which 9 (3.3%) were disabling strokes as defined by the VARC2-criteria. In Sentinel-protected patients undergoing TAVI, no periprocedural stroke was observed (no CPS 7.3% vs 0.0%; p=0.026). Conclusion Our results suggest that Sentinel CPS significantly reduces periprocedural stroke rates in patients undergoing TAVI compared to patients without CPS. However, the study population is small and randomized trials are still needed. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None