Linear and Nonlinear Calibration Methods for Predicting Mechanical Properties of Polypropylene Pellets Using Raman Spectroscopy

2016 ◽  
Vol 70 (7) ◽  
pp. 1118-1127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julio Banquet-Terán ◽  
Boris Johnson-Restrepo ◽  
Alveiro Hernández-Morelo ◽  
Jorge Ropero ◽  
Miriam Fontalvo-Gomez ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Wendy Rusli ◽  
Pavan Kumar Naraharisetti ◽  
Wee Chew

The use of Raman spectroscopy for reaction monitoring has been successfully applied over the past few decades. One complication in such usage is the applicability for quantitative reaction studies. This...


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Wenjian Zhou ◽  
Sheng Yang ◽  
Li Wang ◽  
Hanmin Sheng ◽  
Yang Deng

For most high-precision power analyzers, the measurement accuracy may be affected due to the nonlinear relationship between the input and output signal. Therefore, calibration before measurement is important to ensure accuracy. However, the traditional calibration methods usually have complicated structures, cumbersome calibration process, and difficult selection of calibration points, which is not suitable for situations with many measurement points. To solve these issues, a nonlinear calibration method based on sinusoidal excitation and DFT transformation is proposed in this paper. By obtaining the effective value data of the current sinusoidal excitation from the calibration source, the accurate calibration process can be done, and the calibration efficiency can be improved effectively. Firstly, through Fourier transform, the phase value at the initial moment of the fundamental frequency is calculated. Then, the mapping relationship between the sampling value and the theoretical calculation value is established according to the obtained theoretical discrete expression, and a cubic spline interpolation method is used to further reduce the calibration error. Simulations and experiments show that the calibration method presented in this paper achieves high calibration accuracy, and the results are compensation value after calibration with a deviation of ± 3 × 10 − 4 .


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document