Caregivers’ Experiences With Food Insecurity Screening and Impact of Food Insecurity Resources

2019 ◽  
Vol 58 (14) ◽  
pp. 1484-1492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin J. Orr ◽  
Christina Chauvenet ◽  
Holly Ozgun ◽  
Claudia Pamanes-Duran ◽  
Kori B. Flower

We explored caregivers’ experiences with food insecurity screening in a primary care setting and the impact of resources provided. English- and Spanish-speaking food insecure caregivers of children aged 1 to 5 years were recruited. In-depth individual semistructured interviews were conducted (n = 17) eliciting caregivers’ experiences with food insecurity, clinic screening, and resources provided. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Interviews were double-coded and thematic analysis was used to identify themes and subthemes. All caregivers described multiple and repeat experiences with food insecurity. Food insecurity screening was acceptable, but families were not always connected with resources. Caregivers described WIC (Women, Infants, and Children) as the most commonly used program to address food insecurity and infrequently utilized other food insecurity resources. Screening for food insecurity in primary care was generally well accepted by this sample of food insecure caregivers. Future studies are needed to determine how to improve connecting resources with families most in need.

2021 ◽  
Vol 77 (18) ◽  
pp. 3255
Author(s):  
Sami Ibrahim ◽  
Connor Bracy ◽  
Kimberly Dowdell

Hypertension ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 78 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Melvin R Echols ◽  
Paula Pollard-Thomas ◽  
Henry Nuss ◽  
Heartley Egwuogu ◽  
Kristen Hobbs ◽  
...  

Background: Hypertension (HTN) is the most potent cardiovascular disease worldwide and a major public health concern in the U.S. Although Social Determinants of Health (SDoH) are associated with HTN, it is unclear whether these indicators are routinely captured in the primary care setting. We sought to examine the prevalence of any HTN and its association with captured SDoH for new patients (pts) presenting to an urban community primary care clinic for 2019 and 2020. Methods and Results: We identified a cohort-based, cross-sectional sample of 2,577 new pts ≥ 18 years of age in a community clinic in Atlanta, GA, between Jan 2019 and Dec 2020. Electronic health records were reviewed to determine the rate of selected SDoH indicators (financial strain, transportation, medical transportation, and food insecurity) captured at any time and the presenting blood pressure for all new patients. Blood pressure was classified as follows: normal, systolic BP/diastolic BP (SBP/DBP) ≤120/80 mmHg, elevated SBP 120-129mmHg and DBP<80mm, stage 1 SBP 130-139mmHg or DBP 80-90mmHg, and stage 2 SBP ≥ 140mmHg+ or DBP 90mmHg+. Likelihood-ratio Chi-square tests were analyzed to detect an association between SDOH and stages of HTN. Of the 2,577 pts seen, 93% were African American, 72% were female, 59% were single, 77% had BMI ≥ 25, and 85% were insured. Only 41% (n=1062) pts had information of at least one SDoH measure in the entire cohort. Of the SDoH domains evaluated, financial strain and food insecurity were more likely in new pts with stage 1 HTN or higher (χ2= 16.0, df=8, p=0.04; χ2= 27.7, df=12, p=0.006). Conclusion: Routine assessments of SDoH for African American pts presenting for new pt visits are suboptimal in the primary care setting. However, financial strain and food insecurity are significantly associated with stage 1 and 2 HTN in this population. Standardization of intake processes is essential to increase the collection of SDoH indicators and may ultimately guide secondary prevention strategies for HTN interventions.


2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. A364
Author(s):  
N Triki ◽  
S Shani ◽  
D Rabinovich-Protter ◽  
D Mossinson ◽  
E Kokia ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 202-205
Author(s):  
Anil Kopparapu ◽  
Greg Sketas ◽  
Taren Swindle

Background and Objectives: Screening for and addressing food insecurity in primary care may improve associated comorbidities. The purpose of this study was to explore patient attitudes regarding screening for food insecurity and to elicit patient preferences for intervention in a primary care setting. Methods: Patients (N=284) completed a brief, voluntary survey in a university-based clinic and two community-based clinics over a 5-month period. Respondents were classified as either food-secure or food-insecure based on their responses to a validated food insecurity screener. Results: Participants stated that screening for food insecurity was valuable in the primary care setting (83.9%). Patients preferred having a nurse ask the screening questions (41.2%). The most popular intervention preference, regardless of food security status or clinic type, was to provide a list of food bank locations (76.4%) and local community organizations (71.6%) and to have referral to financial assistance programs (75.4%). There were no differences in preferences for screening or attitudes toward screening by food security status or clinic type (all P≥.05). Conclusions: Screening for food insecurity is not yet standard practice, partly due to concerns over potentially alienating patients with the screening questions. Based on our surveyed patient population and their indicated preferences, screening and providing resource referrals for food insecurity is not likely to damage the clinician-patient relationship.


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 144-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie McGarry ◽  
Basharat Hussain ◽  
Kim Watts

Purpose In the UK, the Identification and Referral to Improve Safety (IRIS) initiative has been developed for use within primary care to support women survivors of domestic violence and abuse (DVA). However, while evaluated nationally, less is known regarding impact of implementation at a local level. The purpose of this paper is to explore the effectiveness of IRIS within one locality in the UK. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative study using interviews/focus groups with primary care teams and women who had experienced DVA in one primary care setting in the UK. Interviews with 18 participants from five professional categories including: general practitioners, practice nurses, practice managers, assistant practice managers and practice receptionists. Focus group discussion/interview with seven women who had accessed IRIS. Data were collected between November 2016 and March 2017. Findings Five main themes were identified for professionals: Team role approach to training, Professional confidence, Clear pathway for referral and support, Focussed support, Somewhere to meet that is a “safe haven”. For women the following themes were identified: Longevity of DVA; Lifeline; Face to face talking to someone; Support and understood where I was coming from; A place of safety. Practical implications IRIS played a significant role in helping primary care professionals to respond effectively. For women IRIS was more proactive and holistic than traditional approaches. Originality/value This study was designed to assess the impact that a local level implementation of the national IRIS initiative had on both providers and users of the service simultaneously. The study identifies that a “whole team approach” in the primary care setting is critical to the effectiveness of DVA initiatives.


2015 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 347-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noelle Huntington ◽  
Kelly Horan ◽  
Alexandra Epee-Bounya ◽  
Alison Schonwald

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document