Construct Validity and Reliability of the Ethical Behavior Rating Scale

1985 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 285-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gloria Hill ◽  
H. Lee Swanson

Based on data from 139 adolescents, results of a factor and correlational analyses of the Ethical Behavior Rating Scale are reported. Reliability coefficients were obtained from a test-retest method and estimates of internal consistence. Construct validity was determined by correlating the rating scale with test items from the Ethical Reasoning Inventory. Two factors (moral character and verbal/moral assertiveness) were derived from the varimax rotated matrix. The results suggest that the rating scale reflects the behavioral aspects of moral reasoning.

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 78-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Caldarella ◽  
Ross A. A. Larsen ◽  
Leslie Williams ◽  
Joseph H. Wehby ◽  
Howard Wills ◽  
...  

Numerous well-validated academic progress monitoring tools are used in schools, but there are fewer behavioral progress monitoring measures available. Some brief behavior rating scales have been shown to be effective in monitoring students’ progress, but most focus only on students’ social skills and do not address critical academic-related behaviors. We conducted a quasi-replication of a study by Brady, Evans, Berlin, Bunford, and Kern examining the Classroom Performance Survey (CPS) by using a multi-step analytic strategy, including confirmatory factor analysis and reliability analysis. Over a period of 3 years, 160 elementary schoolteachers in 19 schools across three states completed a modified CPS on 356 elementary students identified as at-risk for emotional and behavioral disorders. The modified CPS was found to be comprised of two factors (Academic Competence and Interpersonal Competence) and showed evidence of reliability and validity. These results suggest that the CPS shows promise as a brief behavior rating scale for progress monitoring in elementary schools.


1983 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 764-766 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Oas

Psychiatrically hospitalized adolescents were administered Kagan's Matching Familiar Figures test and were rated for impulsive behavior based on the DSM III criteria for the diagnosis of Attention Deficit Disorder. Scores on these two measures were compared to actual reported incidents of impulsive behavior in an attempt to assess the construct validity of Kagan's test and the Behavior Rating Scale.


2021 ◽  
Vol 126 (5) ◽  
pp. 377-395
Author(s):  
Blair P. Lloyd ◽  
Emily S. Weaver ◽  
Jessica N. Torelli ◽  
Marney S. Pollack ◽  
Sunya A. Fareed ◽  
...  

Abstract The purpose of the current study was to explore the scientific utility of two behavior analytic assessments (i.e., progressive ratio and demand assessments) for psychotropic medication evaluation. For a sample of 23 children with disabilities who were prescribed medication, we conducted a series of generalizability and optimization studies to identify sources of score variance and conditions in which stable estimates of behavior can be obtained. To inform construct validity, we calculated correlations between scores from each assessment and those from a standardized behavior rating scale (Aberrant Behavior Checklist-Second Edition; ABC-2). Results offer initial support for the scientific utility of progressive ratio scores. More research is needed to evaluate sensitivity to change and construct validity of scores from these and other behavior analytic assessments.


1989 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yossef S. Ben-Porath ◽  
Carolyn L. Williams ◽  
Craig Uchiyama

1989 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yossef S. Ben-Porath ◽  
Carolyn L. Williams ◽  
Craig Uchiyama

1995 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre N. Tariot ◽  
James L. Mack ◽  
Marian B. Patterson ◽  
Steven D. Edland ◽  
Myron F. Weiner ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document