The State-Federal Rehabilitation Program: Interface with Special Education

1989 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edna Mora Szymanski ◽  
John King ◽  
Randall M. Parker ◽  
William M. Jenkins

There are many differences between state and local special education programs and the state-federal vocational rehabilitation (VR) program. The differences are highlighted through discussion of the history of the state-federal VR program, differing definitions of individuals with disabilities (used in VR and special education), operation of the VR program, and funding differences and resultant differences in evaluation standards between VR and special education programs. Recommendations are made to effect productive interaction between special education and state-federal VR agencies.

1988 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 209-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard S. Neel ◽  
Nancy Meadows ◽  
Phyllis Levine ◽  
Eugene B. Edgar

Recently there have been several follow-up studies of students who have exited special education programs (Hasazi, Gordon, & Roe, 1985; Mithaug, Horiuchi, & Fanning, 1985). These studies raise an interesting question: How well have special education programs prepared the youth they were designed to serve? This study reviews findings concerning the postschool adjustment of 160 students who were labeled behaviorally disordered at graduation from public school in the state of Washington between 1978 and 1986.


1984 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 334-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence W. Marrs

The bandwagon has finally reached rural America. This article discusses important considerations for those who would board this bandwagon carrying baggage which includes preconceived ideas about using traditional special education programs to prepare special educators for rural areas. Competencies and curriculum elements which should be included in preservice programs are discussed.


1970 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 261-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
William M. Cruickshank ◽  
Herbert C. Quay

The growing concern about planning and providing effective physical facilities for special education programs is presented. Particular emphasis is focused on the inadequacy of decisions made by special educators and architects regarding the nature of the physical environment in the absence of empirically obtained evidence. Supporting the need for such research, some of the difficulties encountered—the isolation of variables, management techniques, and design—are discussed.


1964 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 129-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tony C. Milazzo ◽  
Kenneth R. Blessing

The presentation of a point of view on the training of administrators of special education, a survey of current practices involved in such training, and a statement of goals adopted by NASDSE in this area. It is expected that this presentation will stimulate further needed discussion by those concerned with quality leadership in special education.


1988 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 297-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadine M. Lambert

This article summarizes the contemporary major authoritative sources relevant to decisions about eligibility for an appropriate placement of children in special education programs. These sources reflect the work of three major panels commissioned by the National Academy of Science to undertake an analysis of the issues and research evidence regarding ability testing and the testing of handicapped people.


2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Regina Sapona ◽  
Jerry Etienne ◽  
Anne Bauer ◽  
Ann E. Fordon ◽  
Lawrence J. Johnson ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document