Oculomotor Factors In Visual Perceptual Response Efficiency

Author(s):  
Gerald Leisman

The preprogramming of saccadic eye movements is examined by studying the pattern of oculomotor sequences while scanning a visual display. The effects of interference employing a backward masking paradigm on the oculomotor response as well as on position judgment and stimulus identification are examined. Data indicate that the motor programming of an ocular saccade is linked to the perceptual analysis of target position and cannot be set in motion with an impairment in perceptual localization.

1978 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 282-286
Author(s):  
Gerald Leisman ◽  
Maureen Ashkenazi

The preprogramming of saccadic eye movements is examined by studying the pattern of ocular-motor sequences while scanning a visual display. The effects of interference employing a backward masking paradigm on the ocular-motor response as well as on position judgment and stimulus identification are examined. Data indicates that the motor programming of an ocular saccade is linked to the perceptual analysis of target position and cannot be set in motion with an impairment in perceptual localization.


2008 ◽  
Vol 100 (3) ◽  
pp. 1544-1556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos R. Cassanello ◽  
Abhay T. Nihalani ◽  
Vincent P. Ferrera

Due to delays in visuomotor processing, eye movements directed toward moving targets must integrate both target position and velocity to be accurate. It is unknown where and how target velocity information is incorporated into the planning of rapid (saccadic) eye movements. We recorded the activity of neurons in frontal eye fields (FEFs) while monkeys made saccades to stationary and moving targets. A substantial fraction of FEF neurons was found to encode not only the initial position of a moving target, but the metrics (amplitude and direction) of the saccade needed to intercept the target. Many neurons also encoded target velocity in a nearly linear manner. The quasi-linear dependence of firing rate on target velocity means that the neuronal response can be directly read out to compute the future position of a target moving with constant velocity. This is demonstrated using a quantitative model in which saccade amplitude is encoded in the population response of neurons tuned to retinal target position and modulated by target velocity.


1978 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 667-672 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerald Leisman ◽  
Maureen Ashkenazi ◽  
Lance Sprung ◽  
Joddy Schwartz

A study is presented in which the preprogramming of saccadic eye movements is examined in normal (16 boys, 4 girls) and dyslexic subjects (19 boys, 1 girl), as well as the patterning of ocular-motor differences between subjects, which is consistent with the previous study in which no differences in saccadic control are demonstrated between groups of subjects.


1988 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 239-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
James T. McIlwain

AbstractThe trajectories of saccadic eye movements evoked electrically from many brain structures are dependent to some degree on the initial position of the eye. Under certain conditions, likely to occur in stimulation experiments, local feedback models of the saccadic system can yield eye movements which behave in this way. The models in question assume that an early processing stage adds an internal representation of eye position to retinal error to yield a signal representing target position with respect to the head. The saccadic system is driven by the difference between this signal and one representing the current position of the eye. Albano & Wurtz (1982) pointed out that lesions perturbing the computation of eye position with respect to the head can result in initial position dependence of visually evoked saccades. It is shown here that position-dependent saccades will also result if electrical stimulation evokes a signal equivalent to retinal error but fails to effect a complete addition of eye position to this signal. Also, when multiple or staircase saccades are produced, as during long stimulus trains, they will have identical directions but decrease progressively in amplitude by a factor related to the fraction of added eye position.


2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
pp. 613-617 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola De Pisapia ◽  
Lisandro Kaunitz ◽  
David Melcher

1995 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
pp. 280-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. W. Gnadt ◽  
L. E. Mays

1. A functional class of neurons in area LIP on the lateral bank of the intraparietal sulcus were shown previously (Gnadt and Andersen 1988) to be related to the metrics of saccadic eye movements. In this study, we tested LIP neurons at different depths with respect to the plane of fixation. 2. Sixty-one neurons were identified for their increased activity before saccadic eye movements. While holding the location of the target constant at the center of the frontoparallel (saccadic) response field, the neurons were tested systematically during eye movements to target positions proximal (near) to the plane of fixation, at the plane of fixation, and distal (far) to the plane of fixation. By necessity, the movements of these targets required a combination of saccadic and vergence movements. 3. Seventy-two percent of the neurons were found to change their activity as a function of target depth relative to the plane of fixation. The neurons had broad tuning curves for depth. Some cells preferred "near" target positions, some preferred "far" positions, and others responded best in the frontoparallel plane of fixation. 4. The location of a neuron's response field in the frontoparallel plane remained constant regardless of target depth. However, the magnitude of the neuron's response increased when the target was positioned at the preferred depth and it decreased for targets positioned at nonpreferred depths. This indicated that the neurons always were related to the same frontoparallel coordinates, but responded more vigorously when the target was positioned at its preferred depth. 5. The visual display apparatus allowed independent presentation of two stimulus cues for depth: binocular disparity and accommodative demand whereas other cues were held constant. For many neurons, either cue was sufficient to tune the activity in depth, though most neurons responded best for the geometrically appropriate combination of the two cues. 6. Comparison of the binocular tuning for depth with the individual monocular responses showed that the tuning for depth was not produced by simple linear combination of two monocular response fields. 7. We tested a subset of the neurons in a double-movement task that dissociated the retinal coordinates of the visual stimuli from the eye-movement coordinates of the second movement. These tests confirmed earlier findings that this functional class of neurons are active when the eye-movement coordinates matched the neurons' response field. It was not necessary for a visual stimulus to fall within the neurons' response field for them to become active.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


1989 ◽  
Vol 146 (1) ◽  
pp. 195-207
Author(s):  
D. L. Sparks

Current models of the saccadic system imply that there are at least three neural representations of a visual target to which a saccade is made: representations in retinal, spatial (head or body) and motor coordinates. This paper presents the evidence supporting these models and summarizes the available neurophysiological data concerning neural representations of target location. In the superior colliculus, neurones in the superficial layers encode target location in retinal coordinates. Neurones in the deeper layers responsive to auditory and visual stimuli carry motor error signals. Evidence is also accumulating that some neurones in the thalamus and the frontal and parietal cortex convey information about target position with respect to the head or body, but these studies are far from complete.


1986 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 475-491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Shepherd ◽  
John M. Findlay ◽  
Robert J. Hockey

Most previous studies of the attentional consequences of making saccadic eye movements have used peripheral stimuli to elicit eye movements. It is argued that in the light of evidence showing automatic “capture” of attention by peripheral stimuli, these experiments do not distinguish between attentional effects due to peripheral stimuli and those due to eye movements. In the present study, spatial attention was manipulated by varying the probability that peripheral probe stimuli would appear in different positions, while saccades were directed by a central arrow, enabling the effects of attention and eye movements to be separated. The results showed that the time to react to a peripheral stimulus could be shortened both by advance knowledge of its likely position and, separately, by preparing to make a saccade to that position. When the saccade was directed away from the most likely position of the probe, the targets for attention and eye movements were on opposite sides of the display. In this condition, the effects of preparing to make a saccade proved to be stronger than the effects of attentional allocation until well after the saccade had finished, suggesting that making a saccade necessarily involves the allocation of attention to the target position. The effects of probe stimuli on saccade latencies were also examined: probe stimuli that appeared before the saccade shortened saccade latencies if they appeared at the saccade target, and lengthened saccade latencies if they appeared on the opposite side of fixation. These facilitatory and inhibitory effects were shown to occur at different stages of saccade preparation and suggest that attention plays an important role in the generation of voluntary eye movements. The results of this study indicate that while it is possible to make attention movements without making corresponding eye movements, it is not possible to make an eye movement (in the absence of peripheral stimulation) without making a corresponding shift in the focus of attention.


2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Spotorno ◽  
Guillaume S. Masson ◽  
Anna Montagnini

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document