Mental Health Care Models and Their Evaluation: the West German Experience

1987 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Cooper
2020 ◽  
Vol 174 (5) ◽  
pp. 487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juliet Yonek ◽  
Chuan-Mei Lee ◽  
Anna Harrison ◽  
Christina Mangurian ◽  
Marina Tolou-Shams

1991 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 387-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harriet Davidson ◽  
Mark Schlesinger ◽  
Robert A. Dorwart ◽  
Elizabeth Schnell

Author(s):  
Karin Lorenz-Artz ◽  
Joyce Bierbooms ◽  
Inge Bongers

Mental health care is shifting towards more person-centered and community-based health care. Although integrating eHealth within a transforming healthcare setting may help accomplishing the shift, research studying this is lacking. This study aims to improve our understanding of the value of eHealth within a transforming mental healthcare setting and to define the challenges and prerequisites for implementing eHealth in particular within this transforming context. In this article, we present the results of 29 interviews with clients, social network members, and professionals of an ambulatory team in transition within a Dutch mental health care institute. The main finding is that eHealth can support a transforming practice shifting towards more recovery-oriented, person-centered, and community-based service in which shared-decision making is self-evident. The main challenge revealed is how to deal with clients’ voices, when professionals see the value of eHealth but clients do not want to start using eHealth. The shift towards client-centered and network-oriented care models and towards blended care models are both high-impact changes in themselves. Acknowledging the complexity of combining these high-impact changes might be the first step towards creating blended client-centered and network-oriented care. Future research should examine whether and how these substantial shifts could be mutually supportive.


2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachelle Ashcroft ◽  
Matthew Menear ◽  
Jose Silveira ◽  
Simone Dahrouge ◽  
Monica Emode ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Strengthening capacity for mental health in primary care improves health outcomes by providing timely access to coordinated and integrated mental health care. The successful integration of mental health in primary care is highly dependent on the foundation of the surrounding policy context. In Ontario, Canada, policy reforms in the early 2000’s led to the implementation of a new interprofessional team-model of primary care called Family Health Teams. It is unclear the extent to which the policy context in Ontario influenced the integration of mental health care in Family Health Teams emerging from this period of policy reform. The research question guiding this study was: what were key features of Ontario’s policy context that influenced FHTs capacity to provide mental health services for mood and anxiety disorders? Methods A qualitative study informed by constructivist grounded theory. Individual interviews were conducted with executive directors, family physicians, nurse practitioners, nurses, and the range of professionals who provide mental health services in interprofessional primary care teams; community mental health providers; and provincial policy and decision makers. We used an inductive approach to data analysis. The electronic data management programme NVivo11 helped organise the data analysis process. Results We conducted 96 interviews with 82 participants. With respect to the contextual factors considered to be important features of Ontario’s policy context that influenced primary care teams’ capacity to provide mental health services, we identified four key themes: i) lack of strategic direction for mental health, ii) inadequate resourcing for mental health care, iii) rivalry and envy, and, iv) variations across primary care models. Conclusions As the first point of contact for individuals experiencing mental health difficulties, primary care plays an important role in addressing population mental health care needs. In Ontario, the successful integration of mental health in primary care has been hindered by the lack of strategic direction, and inconsistent resourcing for mental health care. Achieving health equity may be stunted by the structural variations for mental health care across Family Health Teams and across primary care models in Ontario.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document