Uniforms and Proscribed Organisations: Does a Proscribed Organisation Need to be Named in a s 13 Charge? Barr v Public Prosecution Service [2020] NICA 46

2021 ◽  
pp. 002201832199434
Author(s):  
Neil Parpworth
Keyword(s):  
Public Prosecution ◽  
Public Prosecution Service

Cassatieberoepen tegen criminele vonnissen en arresten in het Leiedepartement, 1796-1813

2020 ◽  
Vol 88 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 179-210
Author(s):  
J. Monballyu
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Court ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Public Prosecution ◽  
The Public ◽  
Public Prosecution Service

Summary In the department of the Lys, the cassation appeal against criminal judgments was introduced in 1796 and could be made by both the criminal convicts and the Public Prosecution Service. The first cassation appeal was lodged on 5 May 1796 and the last on 18 December 1813. In total, 187 (24%) of the 779 criminal judgments were appealed in cassation, in 172 cases by 319 criminal convicts and in 15 cases by the Public Prosecution Service. Of those 187 cassation appeals, 167 (89.3%) were rejected and 20 (10.7%) were accepted. In the latter cases, this led to the annulment of the contested judgment and, in most cases, the criminal proceedings were (partially) repeated for an equivalent, nearby criminal court.

scholarly journals La Fiscalía española ¿Debe ser una institución independiente?

2018 ◽  
pp. 157
Author(s):  
Juan Luis Gómez Colomer
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Criminal Investigation ◽  
Public Prosecution ◽  
The Public ◽  
Adversarial System ◽  
Public Prosecution Service ◽  
The Government ◽  
Adversarial Model ◽  
Do So

El Ministerio Fiscal español tiene ante todo un problema de identidad orgánica. Se desea que sea independiente del Gobierno, pero las normas confirman una cierta dependencia. El Ministerio Fiscal debe ser dependiente del Gobierno si se consuma la reforma hacia un modelo adversarial de enjuiciamiento criminal, porque ésa es la naturaleza que mejor cuadra con dicho sistema, en donde el acusado sabe que enfrente tiene a la Administración, que, cumpliendo con su deber público, le exige con todo su poder responsabilidad por sus actos. Hasta que se produzca el cambio, es mejor dejar las cosas como están. El Ministerio Fiscal no debe instruir el proceso penal ni dirigir la investigación del crimen mientras no tengamos el antedicho sistema adversarial vigente en España. Sería constitucional si lo hiciera, pero no está probado que esté preparado para hacerlo, y probablemente, a pesar de declaraciones oficiales, no desee asumir ahora esa responsabilidad. Con las normas y la práctica actual, correría el peligro de ser visualizado en los casos más importantes como un órgano no objetivo.The Spanish Public Prosecution Service has, foremost, a problem of organic identity. It is believed that it should be independent from the Government, but the laws confirm some degree of dependence. The Public Prosecution should depend on the Government if the reform toward an adversarial model of criminal procedure is pursued, because that is the nature that best fits a system in which the defendant knows he is facing an Administration that, fulfilling its public duty, is demanding with all its powers that he takes responsibility for his actions. Until the change is produced, it is better to leave things as they are. The Public Prosecution Service should not direct the criminal investigation while the foresaid adversarial system in not in force in Spain. If it did, it would be constitutional, but it has not been demonstrated that it is ready to do so and, probably, in spite of official declarations, the Public Prosecution does not want now to assume that responsibility. With the current laws and practices, the Prosecution Service would be in danger of being taken as a non-objective organ in the most important cases.

More Than Just “Pushing and Pulling”: Conceptualizing Identified Human Trafficking in the Netherlands

2017 ◽  
Vol 64 (13) ◽  
pp. 1765-1789 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne L. J. Kragten-Heerdink ◽  
Corinne E. Dettmeijer-Vermeulen ◽  
Dirk J. Korf
Keyword(s):  
The Netherlands ◽  
Human Trafficking ◽  
Sex Trafficking ◽  
High Standard ◽  
Standard Of Living ◽  
Public Prosecution ◽  
Tunnel Vision ◽  
Public Prosecution Service ◽  
Pushing And Pulling ◽  
Blind Spots

By tradition, the human trafficking discourse focuses on cross-border sex trafficking from impoverished countries to countries with a high standard of living. This article explores whether identified trafficking in the Netherlands corresponds to this. We introduce a model that identifies all possible trafficking situations, and with this, intends to prevent tunnel vision and identify blind spots. Subsequently, we analyze 768 trafficking cases identified by the Dutch Public Prosecution Service (2008-2012) and categorize each case according to our model: by form of exploitation and route of trafficking. The data show that (near-)domestic sex trafficking where victims are not pushed out of impoverished countries, but are recruited on native (or neighboring) soil, is the human trafficking situation most commonly identified.

scholarly journals THE ROLE OF PROSECUTOR OFFICE IN THE ERADICATION OF CORRUPTION CRIMINAL ACTS IN INDONESIA

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 244
Author(s):  
Sri Endah Wahyuningsih ◽  
Agus Sunaryo
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Attorney General ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Police Agency ◽  
Public Prosecution ◽  
The Public ◽  
Public Prosecution Service ◽  
The Republic

In fact, there are still many cases of corruption that have not been revealed; this resulted in the public to be pessimistic with the seriousness of the Prosecutor Office in uncovering variouscases of corruption that are happening today. The purpose of this study is to know the role ofthe Prosecutor Office in the eradication of criminal acts, to obtain an overview of the mechanismof corruption handling by prosecutors in Indonesia and to analyze the obstacles and solutionsin eradicating crime in the Attorney General. The research method was sociological juridical,and data collection were gained by using observation and interview. The existence and role ofthe Public Prosecution Service in eradicating corruption crime begins when the case has notbeen transferred to the Court until the execution of the decision of the Court. However, in thecriminal act of corruption the Prosecutor’s Office has the authority as a public prosecutor aswell as an investigator. The authority of the prosecutor as a special criminal investigator shall beregulated by Law Number 16 Year 2004 regarding the Attorney of the Republic of Indonesia inArticle 30 paragraph (1) letter d. In addition, in its role against the eradication of corruption, theProsecutor’s Office has always conducted a coordination relationship with the Police Agency andthe Corruption Eradication Commission. The mechanism for handling corruption in the AttorneyGeneral Office, through several procedures already set out in the law includes Investigation,Investigation and Prosecution.

scholarly journals The Urgency of Public Prosecution Service of The Republic of Indonesia In The Settlement of Replacement Money In Criminal Acts of Corruption Based on Law Number 3 of 1971

2021 ◽  
Vol 04 (07) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lusiana Lamture, Supardi.S ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Attorney General ◽  
Public Prosecution ◽  
Library Research ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Circular Letter ◽  
Public Prosecution Service ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Data Collection Technique

In ensnaring the corruptors, not from the upstream, but from the downstream, namely by tracing where the flow of corruption funds ends up. It must be understood that a corruptor who then drains the proceeds of corruption means that he has committed two crimes at once. Therefore, the follow the money method is more effective than the follow The Suspect method, namely the handling of criminal acts that prioritize the perpetrators of crimes. With the follow the money approach, activities to hide or disguise the proceeds of corruption can be prevented and eradicated. However, this must still be regulated so that its implementation can be carried out in a concrete manner so that there is no legal vacuum in the implementation of its execution by the Indonesian Prosecutor's Office. The data collection technique in this research is using the library research method. While the analysis technique carried out on the legal materials that have been collected by the author will be done deductively. The results of this study indicate that the regulation of replacement money in criminal acts of corruption is contained in Law Number 3 of 1971 and has been revoked and amended by Law Number 20 of 2001 jo. so that in this case, there is an important role by the Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia, finally the Attorney General's Office issued Perja Number PER-020/A/JA/07/2014 and then upgraded to Perja Number 19 of 2020 and followed up with a Circular Letter of the Deputy Attorney General for Civil and Administrative Countries with Number SE-001/G/Gs/03/2021 dated March 26, 2021.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document