scholarly journals THE ROLE OF PROSECUTOR OFFICE IN THE ERADICATION OF CORRUPTION CRIMINAL ACTS IN INDONESIA

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 244
Author(s):  
Sri Endah Wahyuningsih ◽  
Agus Sunaryo
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Attorney General ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Police Agency ◽  
Public Prosecution ◽  
The Public ◽  
Public Prosecution Service ◽  
The Republic

In fact, there are still many cases of corruption that have not been revealed; this resulted in the public to be pessimistic with the seriousness of the Prosecutor Office in uncovering variouscases of corruption that are happening today. The purpose of this study is to know the role ofthe Prosecutor Office in the eradication of criminal acts, to obtain an overview of the mechanismof corruption handling by prosecutors in Indonesia and to analyze the obstacles and solutionsin eradicating crime in the Attorney General. The research method was sociological juridical,and data collection were gained by using observation and interview. The existence and role ofthe Public Prosecution Service in eradicating corruption crime begins when the case has notbeen transferred to the Court until the execution of the decision of the Court. However, in thecriminal act of corruption the Prosecutor’s Office has the authority as a public prosecutor aswell as an investigator. The authority of the prosecutor as a special criminal investigator shall beregulated by Law Number 16 Year 2004 regarding the Attorney of the Republic of Indonesia inArticle 30 paragraph (1) letter d. In addition, in its role against the eradication of corruption, theProsecutor’s Office has always conducted a coordination relationship with the Police Agency andthe Corruption Eradication Commission. The mechanism for handling corruption in the AttorneyGeneral Office, through several procedures already set out in the law includes Investigation,Investigation and Prosecution.

scholarly journals The Urgency of Public Prosecution Service of The Republic of Indonesia In The Settlement of Replacement Money In Criminal Acts of Corruption Based on Law Number 3 of 1971

2021 ◽  
Vol 04 (07) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lusiana Lamture, Supardi.S ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Attorney General ◽  
Public Prosecution ◽  
Library Research ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Circular Letter ◽  
Public Prosecution Service ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Data Collection Technique

In ensnaring the corruptors, not from the upstream, but from the downstream, namely by tracing where the flow of corruption funds ends up. It must be understood that a corruptor who then drains the proceeds of corruption means that he has committed two crimes at once. Therefore, the follow the money method is more effective than the follow The Suspect method, namely the handling of criminal acts that prioritize the perpetrators of crimes. With the follow the money approach, activities to hide or disguise the proceeds of corruption can be prevented and eradicated. However, this must still be regulated so that its implementation can be carried out in a concrete manner so that there is no legal vacuum in the implementation of its execution by the Indonesian Prosecutor's Office. The data collection technique in this research is using the library research method. While the analysis technique carried out on the legal materials that have been collected by the author will be done deductively. The results of this study indicate that the regulation of replacement money in criminal acts of corruption is contained in Law Number 3 of 1971 and has been revoked and amended by Law Number 20 of 2001 jo. so that in this case, there is an important role by the Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia, finally the Attorney General's Office issued Perja Number PER-020/A/JA/07/2014 and then upgraded to Perja Number 19 of 2020 and followed up with a Circular Letter of the Deputy Attorney General for Civil and Administrative Countries with Number SE-001/G/Gs/03/2021 dated March 26, 2021.

scholarly journals Gugatan Pihak Ketiga Terhadap Eksekusi Barang Sitaan dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 238
Author(s):  
Tedhy Widodo
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Attorney General ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Public ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
The Republic

The criminal act of corruption is a financial and humanitarian crime that harms the state and reduces the people's right to better access to welfare. The settlement of corruption cases often involves many parties, including good third parties related to the evidence seized by the Prosecutor. Judgments in judicial practice still cause new problems. The Panel of Judges imposed a crime in the form of appropriation of property in the control of a well-intentioned third party. The purpose of this paper is to examine the legal status of a third party who has good faith in the execution of confiscated goods in the case of corruption and the role of the prosecutor in a third-party lawsuit related to the execution of confiscated goods in the case of corruption. The research method used is normative legal research with statutes approach and case approach. The study indicates that the legal measures that can be done by a good third party against the confiscated objects in the case of corruption must be in accordance with Article 19 of the Anti-Corruption Eradication Act. The role of the public prosecutor in a civil case is not a public prosecutor or executor but in a lawsuit as a State Attorney Attorney under Article 30 Paragraph (2) of Law Number 16 Year 2004 regarding the Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia. Tindak pidana korupsi adalah kejahatan keuangan dan kemanusiaan yang merugikan negara dan mengurangi hak rakyat untuk mendapat akses kesejahteraan yang lebih baik. Penyelesaian perkara tindak pidana korupsi seringkali melibatkan banyak pihak, termasuk pihak ketiga yang beritikad baik terkait dengan barang bukti yang disita oleh Penuntut Umum. Putusan-putusan dalam praktek peradilan masih menimbulkan masalah baru. Majelis Hakim menjatuhkan pidana berupa perampasan harta dalam penguasaan pihak ketiga yang beritikad baik. Tujuan penulisan ini untuk mengkaji kedudukan hukum pihak ketiga yang beritikad baik dalam eksekusi barang sitaan dalam perkara tindak pidana korupsi dan peranan jaksa dalam gugatan pihak ketiga terkait eksekusi barang sitaan dalam perkara tindak pidana korupsi. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus. Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa Upaya Hukum yang dapat dilakukan oleh pihak ketiga yang beritikad baik terhadap benda sitaan dalam perkara tindak pidana korupsi harus sesuai dengan Pasal 19 Undang-undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Peran jaksa dalam perkara perdata bukan sebagai penuntut umum atau eksekutor akan tetapi dalam perkara gugatan sebagai Jaksa Pengacara Negara berdasarkan Pasal 30 Ayat (2) Undang-undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia.

The Effectiveness of the Supervision of the Prosecutor's Commission in Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Iswantoro Iswantoro ◽  
Rian Saputra ◽  
Anggo Doyoharjo ◽  
Resti Dian Luthviati
Keyword(s):  
Attorney General ◽  
Public Prosecution ◽  
The Public ◽  
Public Prosecution Service ◽  
The Republic

<table width="593" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><tbody><tr><td valign="top" width="366"><p><em>This study aims to analyze the causes of the ineffective supervision carried out by the Prosecutor's Commission in an effort to improve the performance of the Public Prosecutors Office of the Republic of Indonesia. The facts show that there are many negative public reports and complaints regarding the performance of the AGO. These reports are examined first, before being given a recommendation to the Attorney General. As the external supervisor of the Public Prosecution Service, the Prosecutor's Commission has the task of supervising, monitoring and evaluating the behavior of prosecutors and public prosecutors. The existence of the Republican Prosecutor's Commission is experiencing weaknesses in carrying out its duties and authorities</em><em>.</em></p><p><strong><em>Keywords:</em></strong></p><p><em>Prosecutor's Commissioner; Effectiveness; Indonesia.</em></p></td></tr></tbody></table>

The Independence of the Public Prosecution Service in the UAE: Issues and Proposals for Reform

2009 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 217-268
Author(s):  
Ghaith Ghanem Al-Suwaidi
Keyword(s):  
Police Officers ◽  
The State ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Public Prosecution ◽  
Criminal Process ◽  
The Public ◽  
Executive Authority ◽  
Public Prosecution Service ◽  
Investigation Process

AbstractThis article focuses on the role of the public prosecutor in the pre-trial stage in the UAE and on their independence in particular. The Public Prosecution Service in the UAE is a judicial authority, which according to law is independent from the police, courts and executive authority, and has wide powers in respect of the criminal process. It is mainly responsible for the investigation process; it represents the State in the prosecution process, and, last but not least, it is responsible for the enforcement of the sentence. The Public Prosecution Service faces a number of issues and problems, the main ones being lack of independence, lack of impartiality, lack of supervision over judicial police officers, and a lack of judicial supervision over their decisions.

scholarly journals LIMITATIF KEWENANGAN JAKSA PENUNTUT UMUM DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 1324
Author(s):  
Novi Mardihana Sari ◽  
I Nyoman Budiana
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Attorney General ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Republic

Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaturan kewenangan jaksa penuntut umum dalam tindak pidana korupsi, serta mengkaji dan menganalisis limitative kewenangan jaksa dalam tindak pidana korupsi, sudahkah mencerminkan adanya kepastian hukum, keadilan dan kemanfaatan sesuai dengan tujuan hukum di Indonesia. Metode yang digunakan dalam tulisan ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan undang-undang (Statute approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (Conceptual approach). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dalam penanganan tindak pidana korupsi, Jaksa berwenang melakukan penyelidikan, penyidikan dan penuntutan. Hal-hal yang menjadi limitatif kewenangan jaksa penuntut umum dalam penanganan tindak pidana korupsi diatur dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana, Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia, serta Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. This paper aims to determine the regulation of the authority of the public prosecutor in criminal acts of corruption, and to study and analyze the limitative authority of prosecoturs in criminal acts of corruption, has it reflected the existence of legal certainty, justice and usefulness in accordance with the legal objectives in Indonesia. The method used in this paper uses the normative legal research method with the statute approach and conceptual approach. The results showed that in handling corruption, the prosecutor has the authority to conduct investigations, investigations and prosecutions. Matters which become the limitative authority of public prosecutors in handling corruption are regulated inKitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana, Undang-Undang Nomor 16 tahun 2004 concerning the attorney general of the republic of Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 concerning eradication of criminal acts.

scholarly journals Studi Perbandingan Kewenangan Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia Dengan Kejaksaan Malaysia Dalam Penanganan Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 231-256
Author(s):  
Nada Ulya Qinvi ◽  
Alfitra Alfitra
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Qualitative Methods ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Collection Method ◽  
Library Research ◽  
Similarities And Differences ◽  
The Republic

This study aims to explain the role of the Indonesian Public Prosecutor's Office and the Malaysian Prosecutor's Office in corruption crimes as well as the similarities and differences between the authorities of the Republic of Indonesia Prosecutors and the Malaysian Prosecutors in handling corruption cases. This research uses qualitative research research. In this research, the data collection method is carried out by using the library research technique, namely by studying the literature, legislation, books, official documents, and the writings of scholars related to this thesis. and analyzed using descriptive-qualitative methods. The approach used in this research is a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of this study indicate that what becomes the similarity between the authority of the Republic of Indonesia Prosecutor's Office with the Malaysian Attorney is the role of the permanent prosecutor as public prosecutor, while what distinguishes the authority of the Republic of Indonesia Prosecutor's Office with the Malaysian Attorney is the authority in the field of prosecution.Keywords: Comparison, Authority, Attorney, Corruption Crime

scholarly journals Analisis Yuridis Putusan Bebas terhadap Kasus Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 399-411
Author(s):  
Ramot Lumbantoruan
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Theory ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
The Public ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Judicial Role

The purpose of this research is to describe the legal arrangements regarding the Free Verdict according to positive legal provisions, the Judicial role of the Judge in deciding a case and Juridical Analysis of a conviction for a murder crime (Study of Judgment Number 423 / Pid / 2008 PN. South Jakarta. This research method is normative juridical research.The nature of this research is descriptive analysis, which is a method used to describe a condition or condition that is happening or ongoing in order to provide as much data as possible about the object of research so as to explore things that are ideal, then analyzed based on legal theory or applicable laws and regulations.Results of this study, first, the legal arrangements regarding the acquittal according to positive legal provisions is to look at Article 191 Paragraph (1), paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) of the Criminal Procedure Code specifically also provides an understanding that reinforces its role law about being free from all lawsuits. Second, the role of judges legally in deciding a case in the decision of Case Decision Number 423 / Pid / 2008 / PN. South Jakarta is a judge must pay attention to the interests of various parties, both the interests of the defendant, witnesses, and the interests of the Public Prosecutor.

scholarly journals Peran Media Baru Dalam Kegiatan Hijrah Fest

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Firdhausy Amelia ◽  
Kamalludin Kamalludin ◽  
Maya May Syarah
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Young People ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
New Media ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Main Role ◽  
The Public ◽  
Digital Era ◽  
Depth Interview

<p class="15bIsiAbstractBInggris"><em>The birth of new media in today's digital era adds to the variety of existing social media. One of them is Instagram, social media which was initially used only personally to upload photos or videos, now has many roles that are mostly used by young people or the millennial generation. The Hijrah Fest activity, which has a segmentation of visitors to the younger generation, utilizes and optimizes the use of Instagram social media to support its activities. Therefore, in this study, he wanted to find out what roles the new media had in the Hijrah Fest activities. The research method used is qualitative, with in-depth interview data collection techniques with social media managers Hijrah Fest. From the results of observations, interviews, and documentation, the main role of new media on the hijrahfest Instagram social media is preaching. In addition, in supporting the Hijrah Fest activities, his Instagram account acts as the delivery of information related to the event, communication between the Hijrah Fest to the public, and buying and selling transactions from exhibition stands to visitors</em><em>.</em></p><p class="15bIsiAbstractBInggris"><em></em><strong>Abs</strong><strong>trak</strong></p><p>Lahirnya media baru di era digital saat ini, menambah beragamnya media sosial yang ada. Salah satunya ialah instagram, media sosial yang pada awalnya sebatas digunakan secara personal untuk mengunggah foto atau video, kini memiliki banyak peran yang lebih banyak digunakan oleh anak muda atau generasi milenial. Kegiatan Hijrah Fest yang memiliki segmentasi pengunjung pada generasi muda, memanfaatkan serta mengoptimalkan penggunaan media sosial instagram dalam menunjang kegiatannya. Oleh karena itu, dalam penelitian ini ingin mengetahui apa saja peran yang dimiliki oleh media baru, dalam kegiatan Hijrah Fest. Metode penelitian yang digunakan ialah kualitatif, dengan teknik pengambilan data wawancara mendalam bersama pengelola media sosial Hijrah Fest. Dari hasil observasi, wawancara, dan dokumentasi, peran utama dari media baru pada media sosial instagram hijrahfest ialah berdakwah. Selain itu, dalam menunjang kegiatan Hijrah Fest akun instagramnya berperan sebagai penyampaian informasi terkait acaranya, komunikasi antara pihak Hijrah Fest kepada publik, dan transaksi jual beli dari <em>stand </em>pameran kepada pengunjungnya.</p>

scholarly journals Relationship Between the Police and the Prosecutor’s Office in Individual European Countries

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Miroslav Janjić
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
European Countries ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
The Public ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Republic

One of the main characteristics of the investigation in Germany is that the public prosecutor is in charge of investigation and the role of the police mainly depends on whether and to what extent the public prosecutor will entrust them with undertaking investigative actions. France has retained the division into inquests and investigation, as well as a powerful investigative judge. When a formal investigation is optional (it is obligatory only in the event of crimes) and is not conducted, inquests are the only form of preliminary proceedings. Preliminary investigations (inquests) are conducted by the judicial police, at the request of a public prosecutor or ex officio. The Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Italy, which was adopted in 1988 and which came into force in 1989, with its subsequent amendments, is significant, among other things, for introducing the accusatory model of criminal procedure instead of the inquisitorial one included in the Criminal Procedure Code of 1930 that was revoked when the new Criminal Procedure Code came into force.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document