scholarly journals Integrating Classroom, Community, Mixed-Methods Research, and Community-Based Participatory Research to Teach Public Health Practice

2015 ◽  
Vol 130 (3) ◽  
pp. 286-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mudita Upadhyaya ◽  
Marlynn May ◽  
Linda Highfield
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Participatory Research ◽  
Mixed Methods Research ◽  
Public Health Practice ◽  
Community Based Participatory Research ◽  
Classroom Community ◽  
Health Practice ◽  
Community Based

Expanding the Transformative Explanatory Sequential Mixed Methods Design Archetype in a Cross-Cultural Context: The Polemics of African Refugee Livelihoods in Places of Resettlement

2020 ◽  
pp. 155868982093637
Author(s):  
Arati Maleku ◽  
Youn Kyoung Kim ◽  
Njeri Kagotho ◽  
Younghee Lim
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Participatory Research ◽  
Cultural Context ◽  
Mixed Methods Research ◽  
Community Based Participatory Research ◽  
Cross Cultural ◽  
Mixed Methods Design ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Sequential Mixed Methods ◽  
African Refugee

Transformative sequential mixed methods design in a cross-cultural context is seldom straightforward. Using a community-based participatory research approach as the transformative lens in an African refugee context in the southern United Status, we explored: (a) the intersection of culture, financial stress, and financial self-efficacy and (b) tested the efficacy of financial literacy as the focus of a culturally responsive solution grounded in community-identified priorities. Through a three-phased explanatory sequential mixed methods design, we demonstrate how the addition of a third phase of analysis that focuses on convergence and expansion of quantitative and qualitative data integration and cyclical processes of dissemination and action can strengthen the utility of transformative mixed methods research in a cross-cultural context. Our study offers a unique contribution to the long-standing methodological dialogue between the design elements of mixed methods research, community-based participatory research, and migration studies by expanding the transformative explanatory sequential design archetype in a cross-cultural context.

scholarly journals Applying Community-Based Participatory Research Partnership Principles to Public Health Practice-Based Research Networks

SAGE Open ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 215824401667921 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy L. Winterbauer ◽  
Betty Bekemeier ◽  
Lisa VanRaemdonck ◽  
Anna G. Hoover
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Participatory Research ◽  
Real World ◽  
Public Health Practice ◽  
Community Based Participatory Research ◽  
Research Process ◽  
Dissemination And Implementation ◽  
Research Networks ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Practice Based Research

With real-world relevance and translatability as important goals, applied methodological approaches have arisen along the participatory continuum that value context and empower stakeholders to partner actively with academics throughout the research process. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) provides the gold standard for equitable, partnered research in traditional communities. Practice-based research networks (PBRNs) also have developed, coalescing communities of practice and of academics to identify, study, and answer practice-relevant questions. To optimize PBRN potential for expanding scientific knowledge, while bridging divides across knowledge production, dissemination, and implementation, we elucidate how PBRN partnerships can be strengthened by applying CBPR principles to build and maintain research collaboratives that empower practice partners. Examining the applicability of CBPR partnership principles to public health (PH) PBRNs, we conclude that PH-PBRNs can serve as authentic, sustainable CBPR partnerships, ensuring the co-production of new knowledge, while also improving and expanding the implementation and impact of research findings in real-world settings.

Intersection of Mixed Methods and Community-Based Participatory Research: A Methodological Review

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 481-502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa DeJonckheere ◽  
Robin Lindquist-Grantz ◽  
Sinem Toraman ◽  
Kristen Haddad ◽  
Lisa M. Vaughn
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Participatory Research ◽  
Mixed Methods Research ◽  
Community Based Participatory Research ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Methodological Review ◽  
Research Findings ◽  
Research Questions ◽  
Advanced Applications

Although mixed methods research (MMR) and community-based participatory research (CBPR) have been employed to investigate complex research questions to improve the reach, rigor, and relevance of research, little is understood about the intersection of the approaches. We conducted a methodological review of studies ( n = 129) using both MMR and CBPR, an advanced application we refer to as mixed methods community-based participatory research (MMCBPR). We systematically examined published MMCBPR studies to identify the methodological features and use in current research. Findings demonstrate that the components of MMR were not adequately described although some detail was provided about the use of CBPR. This study contributes to the evolution of advanced applications, and we offer recommendations for future applications of MMCBPR.

scholarly journals 3572 The Flint Community’s Action Plan to Rebuild Trust and Encourage Resiliency During the Post Water Crisis Phase

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (s1) ◽  
pp. 96-96
Author(s):  
Karen D. Calhoun ◽  
Kent Key ◽  
E. Yvonne Lewis ◽  
Susan J Woolford ◽  
E. Hill DeLoney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Focus Group ◽  
Qualitative Analysis ◽  
Participatory Research ◽  
Community Based Participatory Research ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Water Crisis ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Community Engaged Research ◽  
Study Population

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: o To review the community’s recommendations on how to rebuild trust in the Flint community. o To review effective community engagement strategies utilized with the Flint Special Projects for project conceptualization, participant recruitment, data analysis, project oversight, and dissemination. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: The study population includes nearly two hundred residents representing seniors, youth and diverse ethnicities recruited to participate in eleven focus group meetings. The population also represents the general public who attended informational meetings in Flint, Michigan to learn about the crisis and allow residents to voice their opinions and concerns during the onset of the crisis. The project is a mixed methods community based participatory research effort that utilized community decision making in all phases of the effort such as pre-conception, implementation, dissemination and advocacy to encourage the community’s recommendations are adopted at policy and institutional responsiveness levels. It includes three community engaged research efforts: (project 1) A qualitative analysis of community sentiment provided during 17 recorded legislative, media and community events, and (projects 2-3) two mixed methods efforts utilizing purposive sampling of stakeholders whose voice may not have been heard. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The project presents a qualitative analysis of the community’s voice during the onset of the man-made disaster when the community first became aware of the emergency manager’s plans to switch the water source. It also reflects current perspectives of community voice since the projects are scheduled to end late February 2019. Findings from a trust measure administered to nearly two hundred residents will be presented, along with a qualitative analysis of focus group findings among segments of the population (seniors, youth, and diverse ethnicities) who may have been left out of narratives on the water crisis. Finally, the project will compare empowerment and resiliency approaches being utilized in Flint, Michigan to recover from the disaster with other approaches grounded in literature and theory. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Communities of color often experience social determinants of health which negatively impact their health, well-being and human rights. Some Flint citizens are experiencing negative health consequences (i.e., rashes, brain and behavioral sequelle, fertility, etc.) as a result of the disaster, and are uncertain of health outcomes in the future. This is the first project to rigorously document and analyze levels of trust and mistrust in the city of Flint since the water disaster occurred. The qualitative research will guide future clinical research that will benefit this traumatized community experiencing high levels of mistrust (i.e., government, elected officials, etc.). The community engaged methodology involved residents and study participants in all phases of the project including project oversight, validating and analyzing data, and dissemination. This methodology will contribute to existing literature and theory on community based participatory research, community engaged research, team science and citizen science. The approaches empowered a call to action among residents, for example, seniors who attended two senior focus group sessions shared “they are hopeful and have a purpose,” resulting in the creation of a council (with officers) at their housing complex to advocate for the well-being of seniors during the recovery process. Recruitment methodologies were extremely successful due to resident level trust in community leaders and community partner organizations. Finally, the project’s examination of approaches encouraging empowerment and resiliency will provide lessons learned for other communities challenged with crisis.

scholarly journals Developing a Community-Based Research Project Proposal to Build Public Health Educator Capacity: A Graduate Student Perspective

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 801-804
Author(s):  
Alexander Joseph Baukus
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Public Health Practice ◽  
Community Based Participatory Research ◽  
Public Health Education ◽  
The United States ◽  
Student Perspective ◽  
Project Proposal ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Community Based Research ◽  
Person Perspective

This article is the author’s first-person perspective of completing an Applied Practice Experience (APE) at an accredited public health program. Graduate-level public health students in the United States are mandated by the Council on Education for Public Health to complete this supervised field experience to apply knowledge and concepts to real-world public health practice. For his APE, the author worked with a faculty advisor and two community groups to facilitate and submit a community-based participatory research grant proposal. This article discusses the author’s experiences before, during, and after the APE. The author outlines challenges and success of working on this applied project. The article concludes with implications for public health education specialists regarding experiential learning and applied practice experiences for graduate students.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document