Is ‘Clicky Hip’ a Risk Factor in Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip?

2005 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 56-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Kamath ◽  
D Bramley
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Developmental Dysplasia ◽  
Radiographic Examination ◽  
Ultrasound Screening ◽  
Additional Risk ◽  
Prognostic Predictor ◽  
Developmental Dysplasia Of Hip ◽  
Targeted Ultrasound ◽  
Hip Ultrasound

Background: The role of the ‘clicky hip’ symptom as a prognostic predictor of developmental dysplasia of hip (DDH) is controversial. We aim to study the role of isolated hip clicks as a prognostic predictor of DDH. Material and methods: 235 babits with persisting or referred with clicky hip beyond six weeks of age were prospectively followed up to note the incidence of DDH. Of these 176 babies were referred for a hip click without additional risk factors. Results: 7 out of 176 cases (4 - IIa, 2 - IIb, 1 - IIc) had initial abnormal ultrasound examination based on Graf classification. However, all babies with isolated hip clicks eventually had normal hips on clinical and radiographic examination. Discussion: While screening of babies with clicky hips does help in diagnosing the odd case of DDH this is not consistently reproducible. Modifying the targeted ultrasound screening by including clicky hip as a risk factor will not reduce the incidence of missed cases. Isolated clicks in the hip joint beyond six weeks age are rarely a predictor of DDH. However when in doubt such cases should be referred to be reviewed by an orthopaedic surgeon or a radiologist experienced in hip ultrasound.

scholarly journals Should We Continue to Screen for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip in Clubfoot? Our Experience and Review of the Literature

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Hip Dysplasia ◽  
Screening Programme ◽  
Developmental Dysplasia ◽  
The Other ◽  
Idiopathic Clubfoot ◽  
Ultrasound Screening ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Targeted Ultrasound ◽  
Dysplasia Of The Hip

Objective: The association between clubfoot and developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) remains uncertain, with only a few studies linking both. However, clubfoot is considered as a risk factor for DDH. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of DDH and evaluate the need for routine hip imaging in our population of children with clubfoot. Methods: Retrospective analysis of all patients treated for clubfoot in our center between 2010 and 2019. We included patients with hip imaging for DDH in the first 12 months of life. Results: There were 108 children with clubfoot who underwent DDH screening. 92 had idiopathic clubfoot and 16 had syndromic clubfoot. Of the patients with idiopathic clubfoot, 2 (2.2%) had DDH; one had a clinically unstable hip and the other patient underwent hip screening on account of the clubfoot alone. Among patients with syndromic clubfoot, 3 (18.8%) had developmental dysplasia of the hip. Two of them had an abnormal hip examination while the other had normal hip clinical examination but other established risk factors for DDH. Conclusion: A targeted ultrasound or radiological screening programme for DDH in idiopathic clubfoot diagnosed hip dysplasia in only 1 child that would have otherwise been missed by clinical examination alone. We conclude that hip imaging is not warranted in children with idiopathic clubfoot and regular clinical screening may suffice. In syndromic clubfoot, due to the higher incidence of DDH, we recommend specific ultrasound screening even in the presence of a normal hip examination. Keywords: Clubfoot, Screening, Developmental dysplasia of the hip.

scholarly journals A new sign in the standard hip ultrasound image of the Graf method.

2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan Vasilescu ◽  
Dan Cosma ◽  
Dana Elena Vasilescu ◽  
Carolina Botar Jid ◽  
Mirela Gersak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Alpha Angle ◽  
Ultrasound Image ◽  
Developmental Dysplasia ◽  
Ultrasound Screening ◽  
Group I ◽  
Graf Method ◽  
Hip Ultrasound ◽  
Tailored Approach ◽  
Group Ii ◽  
The Difference

Aim:    The aim of the study was to assess the usefulness of obtaining a 900 angle between the plane of the osteochondral plate and the surface of the transducer during standard hip ultrasonography according to Graf method. Material and methods: In this retrospective study 1078 patients (2156 hips) were included examined between 2008 and 2014 for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) ultrasound screening. The patients were divided in two groups. Group I consisted of 402 patients examined between January 2008 and December 2011 using the standard Graf method. Group II consisted of 676 patients examined from January 2012 to December 2014 using the Graf method with an additional criterion: 900 angle between the plane of the osteochondral plate and the surface of the transducer. Results: We found more dysplastic patients in group I comparing to group II: 55 (13.7%) and 38 (5.6%) respectively. The difference in the incidence of patients diagnosed with DDH was highly significant (p<0.001). The mean alpha angle value in group I was 65.310, respectively 67.520 for group II (p<0.001). Conclusion: The new osteochondral plate sign has the potential to reduce the overdiagnosis of DDH and provide a better tailored approach to borderline hips.

scholarly journals Early detection of developmental dysplasia of hip by ultrasound

2019 ◽  
pp. 112070001987968 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zita Gyurkovits ◽  
Gellért Sohár ◽  
Anna Baricsa ◽  
Gábor Németh ◽  
Hajnalka Orvos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Positive Family History ◽  
Breech Presentation ◽  
Female Gender ◽  
Developmental Dysplasia ◽  
Developmental Dysplasia Of Hip ◽  
Graf Method ◽  
Hip Ultrasound ◽  
A Prospective Study ◽  
Dysplasia Of The Hip

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of early universal ultrasound (US) screening of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Study design: A prospective study of universal hip screening of all mature neonates was conducted from 2012 to 2013, at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Szeged; 1636 newborns (3272 hips) had clinical examinations and hip ultrasound by the Graf method within the1st 3 days of life. Prevalence of DDH, risk factors, sensitivity and specificity of clinical examinations were evaluated. Results: At the 1st US, 70 of the examined 3272 hips (2.14%) were found to be positive. According to Graf categories, the following distribution was observed: type II C, 21 hips (30.0%); D, 24 hips (34.28%); III, 24 hips (34.28%); IV, 1 hip (1.44%). Regarding the risk factors, female gender, breech presentation and positive family history proved to be significant. Interestingly, 28 (50.90%) of the 55 newborns with DDH had neither positive physical signs nor any risk factors, except being female. The physical examination was calculated for sensitivity (20.0%) and specificity (98.34%). Conclusions: In our 1-year period study, 50.9% of the newborns with DDH had neither any positive physical signs nor any risk factors, except being a female. In contrast, early universal US screening of the hip facilitated to diagnose all cases with hip dysplasia. Hip sonography is an effective mode of prevention in orthopaedics, however further studies are needed to compare the rates of operative procedures in selective versus universal screening models.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document