Michael L. Peterson, C. S. Lewis and the Christian Worldview

Theology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 124 (4) ◽  
pp. 295-296
Author(s):  
Olivia L. T. Mulley
Keyword(s):  
2019 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 197-214
Author(s):  
Vasiliy A. Shchipkov

The article examines the main provisions, terms and methodology of «Radical Orthodoxy», proposed by J. Milbank in his book «Beyond the Secular Order» (2014) and focused on limiting the monopoly of secular metadiscourse and returning the traditional Christian worldview. The author renders and translates into Russian the key passages of the first chapters of the book. The article presents Milbank's analysis of the origins of the modern philosophy main principles, which marginalized theology and became the basis of the modern (secular) philosophy.


2015 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 1157-1172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelley Newlin Lew ◽  
Nancy Arbauh ◽  
Paul Banach ◽  
Gail Melkus

2021 ◽  
Vol 74 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-122
Author(s):  
Michelle C. Sanchez

AbstractToday, Christianity is often described as a ‘worldview’, especially among Reformed evangelicals in the USA. In this article I return to the 1890 lectures where Scottish theologian James Orr adapted the concept of Weltanschauung for Christian purposes. Although it was coined by Immanuel Kant in 1790, and primarily used in subsequent decades to theorise cultural difference and evaluate aesthetic expression, Orr nevertheless claims that the idea of a worldview is ‘as old as the dawn of reflection’ and thus appropriate to articulating Christianity. I examine Orr's engagement with the Kantian and emerging historicist context, paying particular attention to his epistemological and aesthetic citations and showing how Orr both adopts and departs from the characteristic features of the Kantian subject. I conclude by assessing the philosophical and theological costs of this project that, among other things, positions Christianity for perpetual culture war within secular societies similarly shaped by the post-Kantian subject.


Author(s):  
Sherene Nicholas Khouri

Was Jesus crucified on the cross? Did Jesus die by crucifixion? This topic generates so much emotion and conflict in Christian-Islamic dialogue as many theories have developed to prove one side of the equation. While several methods can answer Islamic objections against the biblical belief, the evidential Apologetics is the best method to provide evidence for the Christian claims. Evidential Apologetics is one of the methods that seeks to prove the truthfulness of the Christian worldview by showing historical and scientific evidences. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to use the evidential method to answer three major objections that Muslims raise against the crucifixion of Jesus: Jesus was never crucified, the swoon theory, and the substitute theory. The paper will conclude that there are surmounted historical and scientific evidences that support the event of Jesus’s crucifixion.


2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 344-358
Author(s):  
Erin M. Shaw

This article evaluates Marcia B. Baxter Magolda’s cognitive development theory in Knowing and Reasoning in College (1992) for its potential use in Christian higher education. Baxter Magolda is an educator and researcher who pioneered a study on cognitive development at Miami University. Her study considers both genders’ perspectives on development. This article utilizes John David Trentham’s principle of inverse consistency as a precedent to reorient Baxter Magolda’s model to one consistent with a Christian worldview.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document