Death on Demand: Jack Kevorkian and the Right-to-Die Movement

2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 120-121
2019 ◽  
pp. 173-188
Author(s):  
Joanna Grabowska ◽  
Anna Chodorowska

The “right to life” of every human being, understood as independent of the will of the legislator, natural law, does not find in the current legal system a contrario, the “right to die”. In Polish law, not all forms of euthanasia are punishable. First of all, euthanasia is forbidden, i.e. killing a second person under the influence of compassion caused by a severe and incurable disease and related suffering, after the thought of art. 150 of the Act of 6 June 1997, the Penal Code. This is a privileged type of murder, i.e. threatened by a more lenient criminal sanction than an ‘ordinary’ murder. For the murder of euthanasia from 3 months to 5 years of imprisonment, however, there is the possibility of extraordinary mitigation of punishment, and even waiving its imposition. Of course, not every murder under the influence of compassion and on demand can be a milder responsibility for the offender. A person inflicted on demand by someone who is insane or moribund or underage will be an ‘ordinary’ murder. In addition, there must be serious reasons for the demand for homicide (severe suffering). It will not be euthanasia, but an ‘ordinary’ homicide committed at the request of eg a melancholy with a broken heart. Euthanasia is not only an action (eg injection of poison), but also abandonment (for example, not ordering a life-supporting drug – only for a doctor and nurse).


2009 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-180
Author(s):  
Constance E. Putnam
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 243-253
Author(s):  
Grzegorz Stefanowicz

This article undertakes to show the way that has led to the statutory decriminalization of euthanasia-related murder and assisted suicide in the Kingdom of the Netherlands. It presents the evolution of the views held by Dutch society on the euthanasia related practice, in the consequence of which death on demand has become legal after less than thirty years. Due attention is paid to the role of organs of public authority in these changes, with a particular emphasis put on the role of the Dutch Parliament – the States General. Because of scarcity of space and limited length of the article, the change in the attitudes toward euthanasia, which has taken place in the Netherlands, is presented in a synthetic way – from the first discussions on admissibility of a euthanasia-related murder carried out in the 1970s, through the practice of killing patients at their request, which was against the law at that time, but with years began more and more acceptable, up to the statutory decriminalization of euthanasia by the Dutch Parliament, made with the support of the majority of society.


1992 ◽  
Vol 85 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 2S-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. PATRICK HILL
Keyword(s):  

1996 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-74
Author(s):  
Alan Meisel

AbstractIn the 20 years that have passed since the Karen Quinlan case exposed a simmering clinical issue to the light of day — more precisely, to the press and to judicial process — a consensus has developed in American law about how end-of-life decisionmaking should occur. To be sure, there are dissenting voices from this consensus, but they are often (though not always) about minor issues. By illustrating how this consensus has evolved, this paper explores how law is made in the American legal system and the roles that different legal and extra-legal institutions play in lawmaking.


1988 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 711-712
Author(s):  
A. Nevins ◽  
H. R. Moody
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document