scholarly journals The Evolving Role of Post–Ligament of Trietz Nasojejunal Feeding in Enteral Nutrition and the Need for Improved Feeding Tube Design and Placement Methods

2011 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 303-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. B. A. Silk
Keyword(s):  
Enteral Nutrition ◽  
Feeding Tube ◽  
Nasojejunal Feeding

scholarly journals Nasojejunal Feeding Is Safe and Effective Alternative to Feeding Jejunostomy for Postoperative Enteral Nutrition in Gastric Cancer Patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (02) ◽  
pp. 070-073
Author(s):  
Kalita Deepjyoti ◽  
Srinivas Bannoth ◽  
Joydeep Purkayastha ◽  
Bibhuti B. Borthakur ◽  
Abhijit Talukdar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Enteral Nutrition ◽  
Tube Feeding ◽  
Definitive Treatment ◽  
Feeding Jejunostomy ◽  
Causes Of Mortality ◽  
Nasojejunal Feeding ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients ◽  
Bile Leaks ◽  
Technical Safety

Abstract Background and Aim Carcinoma of the stomach is one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide. Surgery for gastric cancer in the form of total or distal gastrectomy is definitive treatment. Feeding jejunostomy (FJ) though improves postoperative nutritional status and outcome, it is not devoid of its complications. In this study, we present the outcomes of nasojejunal (NJ) feeding and FJ and complications associated with them. Materials and Methods It is both retrospective and prospective observational study in patients with gastric cancer undergoing surgery. Patients were divided into two groups: those who underwent FJ and those who underwent NJ route of feeding placed intraoperatively. Results A total of 279 patients of gastric cancer who underwent surgery were taken into study, of which, 165 were male and 114 females. FJ was done in 42 and NJ in 237 patients, respectively. Gastrectomy + NJ was done in 128 patients, gastrectomy + FJ in 27 patients, gastrojejunostomy + NJ in 109 patients, and FJ in 15 patients. We had three patients of bile leaks in FJ group, of which one patient had intraperitoneal leak who needed re-exploration; rest of the two had peri-FJ external leaks, who were managed conservatively. Most of the complications of NJ group were minor. Conclusion Our study of 279 patients in gastric cancer has shown that FJ is sometimes associated with major complications with increased hospital stay and morbidity when compared with NJ tube feeding without any difference in nutritional outcomes. Hence, NJ route of postoperative enteral nutrition can be considered as an alternative to FJ wherever feasible in view of its technical safety and minor complications and morbidity.

scholarly journals Nutritional and Pharmacological Enhancement of the Gut-Associated Lymphoid Tissue

2000 ◽  
Vol 14 (suppl d) ◽  
pp. 145D-151D ◽  
Author(s):  
M Keith Hanna ◽  
Kenneth A Kudsk
Keyword(s):  
Enteral Nutrition ◽  
Mucosal Immunity ◽  
Lymphoid Tissue ◽  
Severely Injured Patients ◽  
Quarter Century ◽  
The Past ◽  
Improved Outcomes ◽  
Injured Patients ◽  
Lower Morbidity

There has been an explosion of research in the field of nutrition over the past quarter century. Clinical studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of providing nutrition by the enteral route in reducing septic morbidity in critically ill patients. These improved outcomes have been substantiated by animal models that show that enteral nutrition decreases gut permeability while maintaining the gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT) in mucosal immunity. Evidence points to the important immunological role of the gut in the maintenance of mucosal immunity at both intestinal and extraintestinal sites. The preservation of this mucosal immunity by enteral nutrition is consistent with the lower morbidity seen in severely injured patients who receive nutrition via the gastrointestinal tract. For patients who are unable to be fed by the enteral route and who require parenteral nutrition, several supplements show promise in enhancing the mucosal immune system defenses. The nutritional and pharmacological tactics that may enhance the GALT and thereby maintain mucosal immunity are examined.

Evaluation of Delivery of Enteral Nutrition in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation

2008 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debra O’Meara ◽  
Eduardo Mireles-Cabodevila ◽  
Fran Frame ◽  
A. Christine Hummell ◽  
Jeffrey Hammel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Enteral Nutrition ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Feeding Tube ◽  
Feeding Tubes ◽  
Academic Center ◽  
Specific Step ◽  
Feeding Process ◽  
Medical Intensive Care

Background Published reports consistently describe incomplete delivery of prescribed enteral nutrition. Which specific step in the process delays or interferes with the administration of a full dose of nutrients is unclear. Objectives To assess factors associated with interruptions in enteral nutrition in critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Methods An observational prospective study of 59 consecutive patients who required mechanical ventilation and were receiving enteral nutrition was done in an 18-bed medical intensive care unit of an academic center. Data were collected prospectively on standardized forms. Steps involved in the feeding process from admission to discharge were recorded, each step was timed, and delivery of nutrition was quantified. Results Patients received approximately 50% (mean, 1106.3; SD, 885.9 Cal) of the prescribed caloric needs. Enteral nutrition was interrupted 27.3% of the available time. A mean of 1.13 interruptions occurred per patient per day; enteral nutrition was interrupted a mean of 6 (SD, 0.9) hours per patient each day. Prolonged interruptions were mainly associated with problems related to small-bore feeding tubes (25.5%), increased residual volumes (13.3%), weaning (11.7%), and other reasons (22.8%). Placement and confirmation of placement of the small-bore feeding tube were significant causes of incomplete delivery of nutrients on the day of admission. Conclusions Delivery of enteral nutrition in critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation is interrupted by practices embedded in the care of these patients. Evaluation of the process reveals areas to improve the delivery of enteral nutrition.

scholarly journals A comparison of the effectiveness of the early enteral and natural nutrition after pancreatoduodenectomy

Medicina ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 44 (9) ◽  
pp. 678 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saulius Grižas ◽  
Antanas Gulbinas ◽  
Giedrius Barauskas ◽  
Juozas Pundzius
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Enteral Nutrition ◽  
Infectious Complication ◽  
Gastrointestinal Surgery ◽  
Infectious Complications ◽  
Albumin Level ◽  
Early Enteral Nutrition ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Plasma Albumin

The role of postoperative supplementary enteral nutrition after gastrointestinal surgery is controversial. Therefore, a randomized clinical trial with attempts to address the question of plenitude of routine application of postoperative enteral feeding on rate of postoperative complications following pancreatoduodenectomy was performed. Sixty patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy were blindly randomized into two groups: 30 patients in the first group received early enteral nutrition (EEN), while 30 patients in the second group were given early natural nutrition (ENN). The complications were evaluated according to definition criteria. All complications were further subdivided into infectious and noninfectious complications. Our data showed that patients in EEN group gained a larger amount of energy in kcal a day during the first five days after surgery in comparison to ENN group. There was a higher rate of postoperative complications in ENN group (53.3% vs 23.3%, P=0.03). This difference occurred mainly due to the higher incidence of infectious complications in ENN group (46.7% vs 16.7%, P=0.025). There were six cases of bacteriemia in this group of patients, while only one case was observed in EEN group (6 (20.0%) vs 1 (3.3%), P=0.1). The overall risk for the development of any type of infectious complication was 1.5 times higher in ENN group. In conclusion, this study suggests that supplementary postoperative enteral nutrition helps to decrease the rate of infectious complications in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy, especially in those with a plasma albumin level of less than 34.5 g/L and/or ASA class III or higher, since natural nutrition is insufficient in this ca.

scholarly journals Malnutrition in healthcare settings and the role of gastrostomy feeding

2016 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. 352-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Kurien ◽  
Jake Williams ◽  
David S. Sanders
Keyword(s):  
Nutritional Support ◽  
Feeding Tube ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Economic Costs ◽  
Psychological Function ◽  
Feeding Tubes ◽  
Healthcare Settings

Malnutrition can adversely affect physical and psychological function, influencing both morbidity and mortality. Despite the prevalence of malnutrition and its associated health and economic costs, malnutrition remains under-detected and under-treated in differing healthcare settings. For a subgroup of malnourished individuals, a gastrostomy (a feeding tube placed directly into the stomach) may be required to provide long-term nutritional support. In this review we explore the spectrum and consequences of malnutrition in differing healthcare settings. We then specifically review gastrostomies as a method of providing nutritional support. The review highlights the origins of gastrostomies, and discusses how endoscopic and radiological advances have culminated in an increased demand and placement of gastrostomy feeding tubes. Several studies have raised concerns about the benefits derived following this intervention and also about the patients selected to undergo this procedure. These studies are discussed in detail in this review, alongside suggestions for future research to help better delineate those who will benefit most from this intervention, and improve understanding about how gastrostomies influence nutritional outcomes.

Endoscopic Insertion of Nasojejunal Feeding Tube at Bedside for Critically Ill Patients: Relationship between Tube Position and Intragastric Countercurrent of Contrast Medium

2019 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. 163-167
Author(s):  
Hiroomi Tatsumi ◽  
Masayuki Akatsuka ◽  
Satoshi Kazuma ◽  
Yoichi Katayama ◽  
Yuya Goto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Contrast Medium ◽  
Feeding Tube ◽  
Tube Insertion ◽  
Abdominal Radiography ◽  
Feeding Tubes ◽  
Tube Position ◽  
Endoscopic Insertion ◽  
Endoscopic Placement ◽  
Nasojejunal Feeding ◽  
Enteral Nutrients

Background and Oblectives: We evaluated the success rate of endoscopically positioned nasojejunal feeding tubes and the intragastric countercurrent of contrast medium thereafter. Method: This retrospective observational study investigated patients who were admitted to a single intensive care unit and required endoscopic placement of a post-pyloric feeding tube between January 2010 and June 2016. The feeding tube was grasped with forceps via a transoral endoscope and inserted into the duodenum or jejunum. Thereafter, we assessed the position of the tube and the intragastric countercurrent using abdominal radiography with contrast medium. Results: The tube tip was inserted at the jejunum and the duodenal fourth portion in 55.8 and 33.6% of patients, respectively. The tip of the inserted tube had moved into the jejunum of 71.7% of patients by the following day. The countercurrent rate was significantly lower among patients with a tube inserted into the duodenal fourth portion or more distal than among those with tubes inserted more proximally (8.4 vs. 45.4%, p = 0.0022). Conclusions: The endoscopic insertion and positioning of a nasojejunal feeding tube seemed effective because the rate of tube insertion into the duodenal fourth portion or more distal was about 90%. The findings of intragastric countercurrents indicated that feeding tubes should be inserted into the duodenal fourth portion or beyond to prevent vomiting and the aspiration of enteral nutrients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document