scholarly journals Family Satisfaction With Nursing Home Care

2016 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 418-442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tetyana P. Shippee ◽  
Carrie Henning-Smith ◽  
Joseph E. Gaugler ◽  
Robert Held ◽  
Robert L. Kane

This article explores the factor structure of a new family satisfaction with nursing home care instrument and determines the relationship of resident quality of life (QOL) and facility characteristics with family satisfaction. Data sources include (1) family satisfaction interviews ( n = 16,790 family members), (2) multidimensional survey of resident QOL ( n = 13,433 residents), and (3) facility characteristics ( n = 376 facilities). We used factor analysis to identify domains of family satisfaction and multivariate analyses to identify the role of facility-level characteristics and resident QOL on facility-mean values of family satisfaction. Four distinct domains were identified for family satisfaction: “care,” “staff,” “environment,” and “food.” Chain affiliation, higher resident acuity, more deficiencies, and large size were all associated with less family satisfaction, and resident QOL was a significant (albeit weak) predictor of family satisfaction. Results suggest that family member satisfaction is distinct from resident QOL but is associated with resident QOL and facility characteristics.

2008 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jasmin Häcker ◽  
Birgit König ◽  
Bernd Raffelhüschen ◽  
Matthias Wernicke ◽  
Jürgen Wettke

AbstractThe design of the German statutory long-term care insurance (LTCI) is deficient in many respects. One of the major flaws in nursing home care is the inherent incentive problem concerning the relationship of the insured, the insurers and the nursing homes: For one, there is no competition amongst the insurers which influences the negotiation behaviour towards the nursing homes concerning the fixing of the daily payment rates. The nursing homes in turn are more or less unrestricted at setting the daily payment rate as the insured are mostly not in a position to fully practice their consumer sovereignty in case of the need of long-term care treatment. In the framework of this paper we try to quantify the efficiency reserve behind these disincentives in nursing home care and try to assess to what extent the contribution rate to LTCI could be reduced, if the efficieny reserves were exhausted.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 396-397
Author(s):  
T Shippee ◽  
W Ng ◽  
A Restorick Roberts ◽  
J Bowblis

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S890-S891
Author(s):  
Marleen Prins ◽  
Janne van Erp ◽  
Ceciel Heijkants ◽  
Erica de vries ◽  
Ramona Backhaus ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: In 2017, the Dutch National Health Care Institute developed a quality framework describing what high quality nursing home care entails, aimed to improve nursing home care. The current study focuses on evaluating whether Dutch nursing homes comply to the framework, specifically regarding norms about staffing and formation of care teams (skill mix and educational level). Care teams that were experimenting with new staffing levels were monitored to evaluate what changes in staffing occurred and which obstructing or promoting factors they experienced. Methods: Quantitative data about staffing and team characteristics were gathered. Further, qualitative data about motives for wanting to change, the change approach, obstructing and promoting factors and evaluation of changes was collected. Telephone interviews were held at baseline, after 3 months and after 6 months. Thirty-two teams participated in the study. Results: Challenges for making changes in staffing consisted of attracting new care staff, dealing with sickness leave, communication within and between teams, communication with informal carers and combining care for and having attention for well-being of residents in the daily work routine. Additionally, teams wanted to better adjust the skill mix of staff to the needs of residents. Conclusion: For the formation of care teams, there seems to be no ‘one-size fits all’ approach. A quantitative norm that applies to all nursing homes in the Netherlands as described in the quality framework (e.g. a minimum of two care professionals for eight residents during intensive moments of care) is therefore not always the route to high quality care.


BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. e026639 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacqueline F Lavallée ◽  
Trish A Gray ◽  
Jo C Dumville ◽  
Nicky Cullum

ObjectiveTo develop, with nurse specialists and nursing home care staff, a theory and evidence-informedpressure injury preventioncare bundle for use in nursing home settings.DesignThe development of a care bundle.MethodsWe undertook a detailed, multistaged and theoretically driven development process. First, we identified evidence-informed pressure injury prevention practices: these formed an initial set of possible target behaviours to be considered for inclusion in the bundle. During a 4-hour workshop and supplemental email consultation with a total of 13 healthcare workers, we agreed the key target behaviours for the care bundle. We explored with staff the barriers and facilitators to prevention activity and defined intervention functions and behaviour change practices using the Behaviour Change Wheel.SettingNorth West England.ResultsThe target behaviours consisted of three elements: support surfaces, skin inspection and repositioning. We identified capability, opportunity and reflective motivation as influencing the pressure injury prevention behaviours of nursing home care staff. The intervention functions (education, training, modelling) and behaviour change techniques (information about social and environmental consequences, information on health consequences, feedback on behaviour, feedback on the outcome of behaviour, prompts/cues, instruction on how to perform the behaviour, demonstration of behaviour) were incorporated into the care bundle.ConclusionThis is the first description of a pressure injury prevention care bundle for nursing homes developed using the Behaviour Change Wheel. Key stakeholders identified and prioritised the appropriate target behaviours to aid pressure injury prevention in a nursing home setting.


2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 385-392 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tetyana P. Shippee ◽  
Weiwen Ng ◽  
Amy Restorick Roberts ◽  
John R. Bowblis

Family satisfaction, while recognized as important, is frequently missing from validated measures of long-term care quality. This is the first study to compare family satisfaction across two states using validated measures and to compare the organizational and structural factors associated with higher family satisfaction with nursing home care. Data sources are family satisfaction surveys from Minnesota (MN) and Ohio (OH), linked to facility characteristics from Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reports (CASPER) for both states ( N = 378 facilities for MN; N = 926 facilities for OH). Activities and food were among lowest rated items in both states. Relationships with staff were the highest rated domain. Higher occupancy rates, smaller facility size, and non-profit ownership consistently predicted better satisfaction in both states. Our findings show consistent organizational factors associated with family satisfaction and provide further evidence to the validity of family satisfaction as a person-centered measure of quality. This lays the foundation for tool development on the national level.


2002 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 368-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farida K. Ejaz ◽  
Linda S. Noelker ◽  
Dorothy Schur ◽  
Carol J. Whitlatch ◽  
Wendy J. Looman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document