Middle Ear Obliteration with Blind-Sac Closure of the External Auditory Canal for Spontaneous CSF Otorrhea

2016 ◽  
Vol 156 (3) ◽  
pp. 534-542 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shawn M. Stevens ◽  
Ryan Crane ◽  
Myles L. Pensak ◽  
Ravi N. Samy

Outcome Objectives To (1) identify unique features of patients who underwent middle ear/mastoid obliteration with blind-sac closure of the external auditory canal for spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) otorrhea and (2) explore outcomes. Study Design Case series with chart review. Setting Tertiary care center. Subjects and Methods Adults treated for spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid otorrhea from 2007 through 2015 were reviewed and stratified into 2 groups based on the surgery performed: (1) 11 patients underwent middle ear/mastoid obliteration with blind-sac closure of the external auditory canal and (2) 26 patients underwent other procedures. Demographics, body mass index, revised cardiac risk index, Duke Activity Status Index scores, and anticoagulation use were documented. Audiologic data were gathered from pre- and postoperative visits. The primary outcome measure was leak recurrence. Complications were tabulated. Results Poor preoperative hearing was a relative indication for obliteration. Obliteration patients had higher body mass index (43.2 vs 34.9 kg/m2; P < .05), incidence of super-morbid obesity (45% vs 7.6%; P = .015), anticoagulation usage (36% vs 0%; P = .004), cardiac risk scores (1.2 vs 0.1 dB; P < .0004), and Duke Activity Status Index scores. There was 1 leak recurrence (9%). Major and minor complication rates were 9% and 36%, respectively. Mean follow-up was 30.8 ± 8.6 months. Conclusion Middle ear and mastoid obliteration with blind-sac closure of the external auditory canal is effective for treating spontaneous CSF otorrhea. The small cohort reviewed did not experience any major perioperative morbidity. The technique may be best suited for patients with poor hearing, the infirm, and those in whom craniotomy is contraindicated.

2014 ◽  
Vol 151 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. P80-P80
Author(s):  
Andrew M. Rivera ◽  
Daniel Jethanamest ◽  
Simon I. Angeli

2020 ◽  
Vol 188 ◽  
pp. 105597 ◽  
Author(s):  
B.R. Wakerley ◽  
R. Warner ◽  
M. Cole ◽  
K. Stone ◽  
C. Foy ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne B. Gregory ◽  
Kendra K. Lester ◽  
Deborah M. Gregory ◽  
Laurie K. Twells ◽  
William K. Midodzi ◽  
...  

Background and Aim. Obesity is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease and may be associated with more severe coronary artery disease (CAD); however, the relationship between body mass index [BMI (kg/m2)] and CAD severity is uncertain and debatable. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between BMI and angiographic severity of CAD. Methods. Duke Jeopardy Score (DJS), a prognostic tool predictive of 1-year mortality in CAD, was assigned to angiographic data of patients ≥18 years of age (N=8,079). Patients were grouped into 3 BMI categories: normal (18.5–24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25.0–29.9 kg/m2), and obese (≥30 kg/m2); and multivariable adjusted hazard ratios for 1-year all-cause and cardiac-specific mortality were calculated. Results. Cardiac risk factor prevalence (e.g., diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia) significantly increased with increasing BMI. Unadjusted all-cause and cardiac-specific 1-year mortality tended to rise with incremental increases in DJS, with the exception of DJS 6 (p<0.001). After adjusting for potential confounders, no significant association of BMI and all-cause (HR 0.70, 95% CI .48–1.02) or cardiac-specific (HR 1.11, 95% CI .64–1.92) mortality was found. Conclusions. This study failed to detect an association of BMI with 1-year all-cause or cardiac-specific mortality after adjustment for potential confounding variables.


2012 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 1422 ◽  
Author(s):  
John P. Berdahl ◽  
David Fleischman ◽  
Jana Zaydlarova ◽  
Sandra Stinnett ◽  
R. Rand Allingham ◽  
...  

ORL ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 79 (6) ◽  
pp. 331-335
Author(s):  
Christopher J. Ito ◽  
Camilo Reyes-Gelves ◽  
Clayton Perry ◽  
Stilianos E. Kountakis

2003 ◽  
Vol 88 (6) ◽  
pp. 2943-2946 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas A. Tritos ◽  
Alexander Kokkinos ◽  
Ekaterini Lampadariou ◽  
Eleni Alexiou ◽  
Nicholas Katsilambros ◽  
...  

Perfusion ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 026765912094341
Author(s):  
Yalda Salehi ◽  
Saeed Farzanehfar ◽  
Maryam Naseri ◽  
Alborz Sherafati ◽  
Shaghayegh Ranjbar ◽  
...  

Objective: For preoperative radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging, metabolic equivalent is one of the key factors to evaluate the appropriateness. Duke Activity Status Index is a practical method to calculate metabolic equivalents. We intended to validate Duke Activity Status Index in our population for the assessment of preoperative myocardial perfusion imaging appropriateness. Methods: A total of 542 patients referred for myocardial perfusion imaging were recruited. A questionary compiled from Duke Activity Status Index was filled out based on which metabolic equivalents were calculated. Demographic data and history of cardiac risk factors were also collected. Myocardial perfusion imaging was performed using a 2-day stress-rest protocol either by exercise tolerance test or by pharmacologic stress through injection of Tc-MIBI and imaging by a dual-head gamma camera. Results: Out of 542 patients, 369 (68.1%) were evaluated for preoperative risk assessment. Metabolic equivalents (oxygen consumption/min/kg) were calculated at 9.3 ± 5.1, 10.8 ± 4.8, and 8.7 ± 5.1 in total, preoperative patients and patients evaluated for ischemia due to nonsurgical purposes, respectively (p = 0.001). The myocardial perfusion imaging was rarely appropriate in 291 (79.5%), maybe appropriate in 67 (18.3%), and appropriate in 8 (2.2%) patients. The prevalence of abnormal myocardial perfusion imaging was 22.5%, 28.4%, and 12.5% in “rarely appropriate,” “maybe appropriate,” and “appropriate” scenarios, respectively. Metabolic equivalents were similar between patients with normal and abnormal myocardial perfusion imaging (8.7 ± 5.0 vs. 8.5 ± 5.4). Conclusion: Either Duke Activity Status Index is not a proper tool for calculation of metabolic equivalents or the appropriate use criteria is not operational in the population of Iranian preoperative patients in which cultural factors may contribute.


2011 ◽  
Vol 250 (3) ◽  
pp. 445-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruojin Ren ◽  
Ningli Wang ◽  
Xiaojun Zhang ◽  
Guohong Tian ◽  
Jost B. Jonas

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document