Antithrombotic Therapy for Venous Thromboembolism and Prevention of Thrombosis in Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery: State of the Art Review

2018 ◽  
Vol 158 (4) ◽  
pp. 627-636 ◽  
Author(s):  
John D. Cramer ◽  
Andrew G. Shuman ◽  
Michael J. Brenner
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Surgery ◽  
The United States ◽  
Head And Neck Surgery ◽  
Review Of Literature ◽  
Mechanical Prophylaxis ◽  
Thrombotic Complications ◽  
Prevention Guidelines ◽  
Prolonged Hospital

Objective The aim of this report is to present a cohesive evidence-based approach to reducing venous thromboembolism (VTE) in otolaryngology–head and neck surgery. VTE prevention includes deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Despite national efforts in VTE prevention, guidelines do not exist for otolaryngology–head and neck surgery in the United States. Data Sources PubMed/MEDLINE. Review Methods A comprehensive review of literature pertaining to VTE in otolaryngology–head and neck surgery was performed, identifying data on incidence of thrombotic complications and the outcomes of regimens for thromboprophylaxis. Data were then synthesized and compared with other surgical specialties. Conclusions We identified 29 articles: 1 prospective cohort study and 28 retrospective studies. The overall prevalence of VTE in otolaryngology appears lower than that of most other surgical specialties. The Caprini system allows effective individualized risk stratification for VTE prevention in otolaryngology. Mechanical and chemoprophylaxis (“dual thromboprophylaxis”) is recommended for patients with a Caprini score ≥7 or patients with a Caprini score of 5 or 6 who undergo major head and neck surgery, when prolonged hospital stay is anticipated or mobility is limited. For patients with a Caprini score of 5 or 6, we recommend dual thromboprophylaxis or mechanical prophylaxis alone. Patients with a Caprini score ≤4 should receive mechanical prophylaxis alone. Implications for Practice Otolaryngologists should consider an individualized and risk-stratified plan for perioperative thromboprophylaxis in every patient. The risk of bleeding must be weighed against the risk of VTE when deciding on chemoprophylaxis.

A National Survey of Robotic Surgery Training Among Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Residents

2021 ◽  
pp. 000348942199696
Author(s):  
Hilary C. McCrary ◽  
Sierra R. McLean ◽  
Abigail Luman ◽  
Patricia O’Sullivan ◽  
Brigitte Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
National Survey ◽  
Neck Surgery ◽  
The United States ◽  
Head And Neck Surgery ◽  
Residency Programs ◽  
Surgery Training ◽  
Robotic Surgery Training ◽  
Operative Experience

Objective: The aim of this study is to describe the current state of robotic surgery training among Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery (OHNS) residency programs in the United States. Methods: This is a national survey study among OHNS residents. All OHNS residency programs were identified via the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education website. A total of 64/127 (50.3%) of OHNS programs were selected based on a random number generator. The main outcome measure was the number of OHNS residents with access to robotic surgery training and assessment of operative experience in robotic surgery among those residents. Results: A total of 140 OHNS residents participated in the survey, of which 59.3% (n = 83) were male. Response rate was 40.2%. Respondents came from middle 50.0% (n = 70), southern 17.8% (n = 25), western 17.8% (n = 25), and eastern sections 14.3% (n = 20). Most respondents (94.3%, n = 132) reported that their institution utilized a robot for head and neck surgery. Resident experience at the bedside increased in the junior years of training and console experience increased across the years particularly for more senior residents. However, 63.4% of residents reported no operative experience at the console. Only 11.4% of programs have a structured robotics training program. Conclusion: This survey indicated that nearly all OHNS residencies utilize robotic surgery in their clinical practice with residents receiving little formal education in robotics or experience at the console. OHNS residencies should aim to increase access to training opportunities in order to increase resident competency. Level of Evidence: IV

Implementation of duty hour standards in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery residency training

2005 ◽  
Vol 132 (6) ◽  
pp. 819-822 ◽  
Author(s):  
Todd A. Kupferman ◽  
Tim S. Lian
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck ◽  
Residency Training ◽  
Training Programs ◽  
Neck Surgery ◽  
Program Directors ◽  
The United States ◽  
Head And Neck Surgery ◽  
Training Experience ◽  
Duty Hours ◽  
Resident Duty

OBJECTIVE: To determine what impact, if any, of the recently implemented duty hour standards have had on otolaryngology-head and neck surgery residency programs from the perspective of program directors. We hypothesized that the implementation of resident duty hour limitations have caused changes in otolaryngology training programs in the United States. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Information was collected via survey in a prospective, blinded fashion from program directors of otolaryngology-head and neck residency training programs in the United States. RESULTS: Overall, limitation of resident duty hours is not an improvement in otolaryngology-head and neck residency training according to 77% of the respondents. The limitations on duty hours have caused changes in the resident work schedules in 71% of the programs responding. Approximately half of the residents have a favorable impression of the work hour changes. Thirty-two percent of the respondents indicate that changes to otolaryngology support staff were required, and of those many hired physician assistants. Eighty-four percent of the respondents did not believe that the limitations on resident duty hours improved patient care, and 81% believed that it has negatively impacted resident training experience. Forty-five percent of the program directors felt that otolaryngology-head and neck faculty were forced to increase their work loads to accommodate the decrease in the time that residents were allowed to be involved in clinical activities. Fifty-four percent of the programs changed from in-hospital to home call to accommodate the duty hour restrictions. CONCLUSIONS: According to the majority of otolaryngology-head and neck surgery program directors who responded to the survey, the limitations on resident duty hours imposed by the ACGME are not an improvement in residency training, do not improve patient care, and have decreased the training experience of residents. SIGNIFICANCE: This study demonstrates that multiple changes have been made to otolaryngology-head and neck surgery training programs because of work hour limitations set forth by the ACGME.

Commentary on “Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Physician Workforce Issues An Analysis for Future Specialty Planning” by Kim, Cooper, and Kennedy

2012 ◽  
Vol 146 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shannon P. Pryor ◽  
Linda Brodsky ◽  
Sujana S. Chandrasekhar ◽  
Lauren Zaretsky ◽  
Duane J. Taylor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Surgery ◽  
The United States ◽  
Head And Neck Surgery ◽  
Physician Workforce ◽  
Modeling Methods ◽  
The Us ◽  
Workforce Issues ◽  
Time Work ◽  
Part Time

An impending physician shortage has been projected. The article by Kim, Cooper, and Kennedy, titled “Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Physician Workforce Issues: An Analysis for Future Specialty Planning,” is an attempt to evaluate and address this potential shortage as it applies to otolaryngology. The authors of this comment have concerns about the article’s assumptions, design, and recommendations. Kim et al attempt to extrapolate data from other specialties and other countries to the US otolaryngology workforce, use that data in modeling methods without demonstrated validity, and based on their analysis, they recommend drastic changes to otolaryngologic training and practice in the United States. Particularly troublesome are (1) the emphasis placed on gender and part-time work and (2) the measurement of productivity defined as hours worked per week. Before redefining our specialty, more thorough and systematic data acquisition and review are necessary to meet the needs of our patients now and in the future.

Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Physician Work Force Issues

2012 ◽  
Vol 146 (2) ◽  
pp. 196-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin Suk C. Kim ◽  
Richard A. Cooper ◽  
David W. Kennedy
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck ◽  
Census Data ◽  
Supply And Demand ◽  
Insurance Coverage ◽  
Neck Surgery ◽  
The United States ◽  
Economic Modeling ◽  
Head And Neck Surgery ◽  
Population Census ◽  
Data Sets

Objective. To predict future trends in the otolaryngology workforce and propose solutions to correct the identified discrepancies between supply and demand. Study Design. Economic modeling and analysis. Setting. Data sets at national medical and economic organizations. Subjects and Methods. Based on current American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, American Medical Association, and National Residency Matching Program data sets, population census data, and historical physician growth demand curves, the future otolaryngology workforce supply and demand were modeled. Adjustments were made for projected increases in mid-level providers, increased insurance coverage, and the potential effects of lifestyle preferences. Results. There are currently approximately 8600 otolaryngologists in the United States. Estimated demand by 2025 is 11,127 based on projected population growth and anticipated increase in insurance coverage. With an average retirement age of 65 years and no increase in PGY-1 positions for the specialty, the number of otolaryngologists in 2025 will be approximately 2500 short of projected demand. This shortfall will not be adequately compensated by mid-level providers performing less intensive services and may be increased by lifestyle preferences and changing demographics among medical students and residents. The current geographic maldistribution of otolaryngologists is likely to be exacerbated. Conclusion. The specialty needs to actively plan for the coming otolaryngologist shortage and train mid-level providers within the specialty. Failure to plan appropriately may result in a reduction in scope of practice of high-intensity services, which will likely remain a physician prerogative. Given the limited likelihood of a significant increase in residency slots, strong consideration should be given to shortening the base otolaryngology training program length.

scholarly journals Venous thromboembolism in head and neck surgery: Risk, outcome, and burden at the national level

Head & Neck ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 1545-1545 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zaid Al‐Qurayshi ◽  
Jarrett Walsh ◽  
Rodrigo Bayon ◽  
Emad Kandil
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
National Level ◽  
Neck Surgery ◽  
Head And Neck Surgery

Implementation of a Novel Protocol for Preventing Venous Thromboembolism in Otolaryngology Patients

2021 ◽  
pp. 019459982110249
Author(s):  
Lirit Levi ◽  
Galia Spectre ◽  
Ofir Nesichi ◽  
Avi Leader ◽  
Pia Raanani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Postoperative Bleeding ◽  
Neck Surgery ◽  
Head And Neck Surgery ◽  
Assessment Model ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Secondary Outcome

Objective Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a preventable cause of postoperative morbidity and mortality. The Caprini risk assessment model (CRAM) is a validated tool for estimating the risk for postoperative VTE. Previous studies demonstrated a low risk of VTE among otorhinolaryngology–head and neck surgery (ORL-HNS). Hence, our objective was to modify the CRAM-based protocol to be applicable for otolaryngology patients and assess protocol efficacy and safety. Study Design Observational pilot study conducted on ORL-HNS patients undergoing surgery. Setting University-affiliated tertiary care center. Methods We constructed a modified protocol based on the CRAM and previous reports in the ORL-HNS literature using a reduced postoperative anticoagulation regimen. Primary end point was symptomatic VTE up to 3 months after surgery. Main secondary outcome was postoperative bleeding. Results A total of 508 patients were enrolled. Of them, 48% underwent head and neck surgery, 18% direct laryngoscopy and transoral robotic surgery, 15% endoscopic sinus surgery, and 11% otology surgery. Adherence to the protocol was 79%. Mean follow-up time was 115 days (range, 30-448 days). Only 1 patient developed deep vein thrombosis, and none developed pulmonary embolism. Two patients had major bleeding not related to the use of anticoagulation. Conclusions Our novel CRAM-based protocol appears to be efficacious and safe for VTE prevention in otolaryngology. A larger-scale study is required to validate these findings. Level of Evidence Level 2b.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document