Opioids and the Otolaryngologist: An Ambulatory Assessment

Objectives To recognize current opioid prescription patterns in otolaryngology and determine changes in rates of outpatient opioid prescribing over time. Study Design Cross-sectional analysis of national survey database. Setting Ambulatory care settings in the United States. Subjects and Methods The National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey from 2006 to 2013 was analyzed for outpatient otolaryngology visits. The rate of opioid medication prescribing was determined with patient and visit characteristics associated with an opioid prescription, including corresponding diagnoses. Calendar trends for the rate of opioid prescribing were determined and compared biennially. Results Among 19.2 ± 1.7 million otolaryngology visits annually (raw N = 11,905), there were 728,000 ± 96,000 visits with an opioid prescription (3.8% ± 0.4%). Adults were more likely than children to receive a narcotic (4.3% vs 1.9%, P < .001); there was no significant difference according to sex (3.9% female vs 3.7% male, P = .567). With respect to calendar trend, the opioid prescription rate increased significantly from 2.3% in 2006-2007 to 4.6% in 2008-2011 and then decreased to 3.5% in 2012-2013 ( P < .031). The most common visit diagnosis categories associated with opioid prescribing were as follows: postoperative care (19.7% of prescriptions), adenotonsillitis (13.9%), chronic otitis media (8.7%), otitis externa (6.2%), and nasal obstruction (5.6%). Conclusion Despite the opioid epidemic in the United States, only a small portion of otolaryngology visits were associated with opioid prescription. However, given the significant increase in prescribing from 2008 to 2011, continued surveillance of prescribing patterns is warranted.

Download Full-text

Current Opioid Prescribing Patterns after Microdirect Laryngoscopy

Annals of Otology Rhinology & Laryngology ◽

10.1177/0003489419877912 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 129 (2) ◽

pp. 142-148 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Molly N. Huston ◽

Rouya Kamizi ◽

Tanya K. Meyer ◽

Albert L. Merati ◽

John Paul Giliberto

Keyword(s):

The United States ◽

Opioid Abuse ◽

Prescribing Patterns ◽

Opioid Analgesia ◽

Opioid Use ◽

Prescribing Practices ◽

Cross Sectional Survey ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Opioid Prescription ◽

Opioid Prescribing

Background: The prevalence of opioid abuse has become epidemic in the United States. Microdirect laryngoscopy (MDL) is a common otolaryngological procedure, yet prescribing practices for opioids following this operation are not well characterized. Objective: To characterize current opioid-prescribing patterns among otolaryngologists performing MDL. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of otolaryngologists at a national laryngology meeting. Results: Fifty-eight of 205 physician registrants (response rate 28%) completed the survey. Fifty-nine percent of respondents were fellowship-trained in laryngology. Respondents performed an average of 13.3 MDLs per month. Thirty-four percent of surgeons prescribe opioids for over two-thirds of their MDLs, while only 7% of surgeons never prescribe opioids. Eighty-eight percent of surgeons prescribed a combination opioid and acetaminophen compound, hydrocodone being the most common opioid component. Many surgeons prescribe non-opioid analgesics as well, with 70% and 84% of surgeons recommending acetaminophen and ibuprofen after MDL respectively. When opioids were prescribed, patient preference, difficult exposure and history of opioid use were the most influential patient factors. Concerns of opioid abuse, the physician role in the opioid crisis, and literature about postoperative non-opioid analgesia were also underlying themes in influencing opioid prescription patterns after MDL. Conclusions: In this study, over 90% of practicing physicians surveyed are prescribing opioids after MDL, though many are also prescribing non-opioid analgesia as well. Further studies should be completed to investigate the needs of patients following MDL in order to allow physicians to selectively and appropriately prescribe opioid analgesia postoperatively.

Download Full-text

Depression Treatment among Adults with Multiple Sclerosis and Depression in Ambulatory Care Settings in the United States

Multiple Sclerosis International ◽

10.1155/2017/3175358 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 2017 ◽

pp. 1-9 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Sandipan Bhattacharjee ◽

Lisa Goldstone ◽

Queeny Ip ◽

Terri Warholak

Keyword(s):

United States ◽

Medical Care ◽

National Level ◽

The United States ◽

Cross Sectional Study ◽

Depression Treatment ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Care Survey ◽

Ambulatory Medical Care ◽

Predictors Of Depression

Background. There is little information regarding depression treatment patterns among adults with MS and depression in ambulatory settings at national level in the United States (US).Objectives. The objectives of this study were to identify patterns and predictors of depression treatment in ambulatory settings in US among adults with MS and depression.Methods. A cross-sectional study was conducted by pooling multiple years (2005–2011) of National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and the outpatient department of the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data. The final study sample was comprised of ambulatory visits among adults with MS and depression. Dependent variable of this study was pharmacological treatment for depression with or without psychotherapy. Predictors of depression treatment were determined by conducting multivariable logistic regression.Results. Out of all ambulatory visits involving MS diagnosis, 20.59% also involved a depression diagnosis. Depression treatment was observed in 57.25% of the study population. Fluoxetine was the most prescribed individual antidepressant. Age and total number of chronic diseases were significant predictors of depression treatment.Conclusion. Approximately six out of ten ambulatory visits involving MS and depression recorded some form of depression treatment. Future longitudinal studies should examine health outcomes associated with depression treatment in this population.

Download Full-text

A Cross-sectional Analysis of Pediatric Ambulatory Tonsillectomy Surgery in the United States

Otolaryngology ◽

10.1177/0194599819844791 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 161 (4) ◽

pp. 699-704 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Yann-Fuu Kou ◽

Ron B. Mitchell ◽

Romaine F. Johnson

Keyword(s):

United States ◽

Sleep Disordered Breathing ◽

Ambulatory Surgery ◽

The United States ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Ambulatory Surgery Centers ◽

Obstructive Sleep ◽

Care Survey ◽

Ambulatory Medical Care ◽

Obstructive Sleep Disordered Breathing

ObjectivesTo report nationwide estimates of ambulatory tonsillectomies performed in hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers in the United States.Study DesignCross-sectional survey.SettingNational databases.Subjects and MethodsWe analyzed the 2010 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey of hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers for pediatric patients undergoing tonsillectomy with or without adenoidectomy. We determined estimations of the number of procedures, demographics, and outcomes. A tonsillectomy cohort from the 2009 National Inpatient Sample served as a comparison group.ResultsIn 2010, there were an estimated 339,000 (95% CI, 288,000-391,000) ambulatory tonsillectomies in the United States. The mean age was 7.8 years (SD, 5.1), and 71,000 (21.0%) were <3 years old. The male:female ratio was even (51% vs 49%). The racial makeup mirrored the US census (69% white, 18% Hispanic, and 12% black). Obstructive sleep-disordered breathing was reported in 48%. Perioperative events such as apnea, hypoxia, or bleeding occurred 7.8% of the time. Approximately 9% of patients could not be discharged home. When compared with cases of inpatient tonsillectomies, ambulatory cases comprised older patients (7.8 vs 5.9 years, P < .001) and were less likely to include obstructive sleep-disordered breathing (48% vs 77%, P < .001).ConclusionTonsillectomy was one of the most common ambulatory surgical procedures in 2010 in the United States. The majority of patients were low risk, but some at higher risk were included (age ≤3 years and obstructive sleep apnea). The National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey estimates provide useful baseline data for future research on quality measures and outcomes.

Download Full-text