Surgical Management of Iatrogenic Facial Nerve Injuries

1994 ◽  
Vol 111 (5) ◽  
pp. 606-610 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Douglas Green ◽  
Clough Shelton ◽  
Derald E. Brackmann

Surgical management of an latrogenic facial nerve injury represents a significant challenge for the otologic surgeon. The decision to perform facial nerve grafting is a difficult one and is based on the extent of injury to the nerve. We conducted a review of 22 patients who had sustained latrogenic facial nerve injuries during otologic surgery that required surgical exploration. The facial nerve was transected more than half its diameter in 13 of the patients. All of these patients' nerves were repaired either with direct reanastomosis of the facial nerve or with a cable nerve graft. The transection was less than 50% in nine of the patients in the study group. Eight of these patients underwent only decompression of the facial nerve. No patient with a neural repair (direct anastomosis or cable graft) had better than a House grade III result. All of the patients undergoing direct anastomosis of the nerve obtained a House grade III result. The most common result in patients undergoing cable nerve grafting was a House grade IV. The only patients with normal or near-normal facial nerve function (House grade I or II) had only decompression of the facial nerve. Five of the eight patients undergoing decompression had results similar to those undergoing cable nerve grafts. We conclude that acceptable results can be obtained when the facial nerve is repaired by direct anastomosis or a cable nerve graft. These results are comparable with those of patients treated with decompression only. When in doubt as to the extent of injury, it is preferable to repair the facial nerve, because the extent of injury may be underestimated.

2013 ◽  
pp. 253-270
Author(s):  
Alison Snyder-Warwick ◽  
Thomas H. Tung ◽  
Susan E. Mackinnon

1994 ◽  
Vol 111 (5) ◽  
pp. 606-610 ◽  
Author(s):  
J GREENJR ◽  
C SHELTON ◽  
D BRACKMANN

2018 ◽  
Vol 68 (12) ◽  
pp. 2936-2940
Author(s):  
Irina Mihaela Jemnoschi Hreniuc ◽  
Camelia Tamas ◽  
Sorin Aurelian Pasca ◽  
Bogdan Ciuntu ◽  
Roxana Ciuntu ◽  
...  

Nerve injuries are a common pathology in hand trauma. The consequences are drastic both for patients and doctors/medical system. In many cases direct coaptation is impossible. A nerve graft should be used in the case of a neuroma, trauma or tumor, for restoration of nervous influx. The aim of this study is demonstrate that by grafting restant nerve stumps with muscle-in-vein nerve grafts we obtain good result in terms of functional and sensibility recovery and also our method �window-vein� is a good way of prolonging nerve grafts. The method of study is experimental. We worked in the laboratory in optimal conditions for carrying out of muscles-in-vein nerve grafts (nerve grafts size 1.5 cm-3 cm). We used acellular muscle grafts with the chemical extraction method.The study was conducted on experimental animals (Wistar male rats).We used 30 experience animals in 3 equal groups (classical group and muscle-in-vein nerve grafts-2 nerve grafts of 1,5 cm central sutured and the third group with muscle-in-vein nerve grafts, window-vein method, 3 cm). At 4 and respectively 6 weeks postoperative at the quality tests we observed the progress with the footprint test. The operated hind in comparison with the healthy hind was 86% recovered and similar with classic nerve grafts. Quantitatively the number of regenerated axons in the group with muscle-in-vein nerve grafts was significant bigger in comparison with the classical group (15%).The method using muscle-in-vein nerve graft with windows-vein it�s a good alternative for nerve grafting in comparison with classical nerve grafting. When the local possibilities are limited, this method is good for prolonging the grafts. The relationship between cost and benefit in this case it�s an advantage because we use the local resources of the affected area. The motor results of nerve grafting ingroup 2 in comparison with group 3 were similar and in some cases better in group 1. Grafting with MVNG offers a better alternative for donor site regeneration in comparison with classical nerve grafts. This method is useful to prolong nerve grafts without adding morbidity.


2011 ◽  
Vol 36 (7) ◽  
pp. 535-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Okazaki ◽  
A. Al-Shawi ◽  
C. R. Gschwind ◽  
D. J. Warwick ◽  
M. A. Tonkin

This study evaluates the outcome of axillary nerve injuries treated with nerve grafting. Thirty-six patients were retrospectively reviewed after a mean of 53 months (minimum 12 months). The mean interval from injury to surgery was 6.5 months. Recovery of deltoid function was assessed by the power of both abduction and retropulsion, the deltoid bulk and extension lag. The deltoid bulk was almost symmetrical in nine of 34 cases, good in 22 and wasted in three. Grade M4 or M5* was achieved in 30 of 35 for abduction and in 32 of 35 for retropulsion. There was an extension lag in four patients. Deltoid bulk continued to improve with a longer follow-up following surgery. Nerve grafting to the axillary nerve is a reliable method of regaining deltoid function when the lesion is distal to its origin from the posterior cord.


2018 ◽  
Vol 112 ◽  
pp. e14-e22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suming Shi ◽  
Yuhang Han ◽  
Lei Xu ◽  
Jianfeng Li ◽  
Yuechen Han ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document