Procedural Justice, Job Satisfaction and Organizational Citizenship Behaviour: Mediating Role of Organizational Trust—Indian Tourism Industry Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 275-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lalit Kumar Yadav ◽  
Pawan Gupta

This study attempts to understand job satisfaction (JS) and organizational citizenship behaviour (OCB) in relation to procedural justice (PJ). It also studies the mechanism through which PJ is likely to influence the dependent variables. On the basis of existing literature, organizational trust is identified as the mediating instrument through which PJ may affect JS and OCB. A survey-based design was used to collect data from 204 employees in the National Capital Region of Delhi. The respondents were working in organizations that broadly encompass the tourism industry. Correlation, regression and hierarchical multiple regression were used to test the model in the study. The mediation model was also tested using the bias-corrected percentile method with 5000 bootstrap samples. The results of the study corroborated with the previous findings and the stated hypotheses, with the exception that organizational trust was found not to mediate the relation between PJ and OCB. Some significant implications for managers and organizations can be gauged from this study. Managers must work towards establishing fair procedures in all aspects of organizational functioning. They should also decipher the attributes of organizational trust which are perceived as valuable by the employees.

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter J. Reiley ◽  
Rick R. Jacobs

AbstractThis study examined the intermediate role job satisfaction and organizational commitment play between leaders' perceived use of power and followers' performance. Based on a sample of 365 cadets at the U.S. Air Force Academy, this study found followers' job satisfaction and commitment mediated the positive relationships between their leaders' use of expert, referent, and reward power and the followers' organizational citizenship behavior. Further, while the use of legitimate or coercive power were both related negatively to followers' in-role job performance, these relationships were not mediated by the followers' job satisfaction or organizational commitment. This study then discusses the practical implications of these findings, highlights its theoretical contributions toward understanding power's direct and indirect relationships with performance in the leadership dynamic, and recommends future research avenues to leverage and build upon these findings.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document