Comparing the effects of no intervention with therapeutic exercise, and exercise with additional Kinesio tape in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome. A three-arm randomized controlled trial

2020 ◽  
pp. 026921552097176
Author(s):  
Amir Letafatkar ◽  
Pouya Rabiei ◽  
Sarvenaz Kazempour ◽  
Samaneh Alaei-Parapari

Objective: To investigate if adding Kinesio tape to therapeutic exercise is an effective treatment to improve clinical outcomes compared to therapeutic exercise alone and no intervention, in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome. Design: Three-arm randomized controlled trial Setting: Outpatient setting Subjects: One hundred and twenty patients (mean (SD): age 37.8 (5.4)) with shoulder impingement syndrome. Intervention: Patients were randomly assigned to eight-weeks therapeutic exercise alone, therapeutic exercise with Kinesio tape, and control group. Main measures: Pain was measured with a numerical rating scale and disability and scapular kinematics were measured with a relative questionnaire and motion analysis software respectively, at baseline and after eight-weeks intervention. Results: There was significant differences in therapeutic exercise with Kinesio tape group vs. therapeutic exercise alone and control group respectively for pain ( d = –0.34, P = 0.042; and d = –1.53, P = 0.001), disability ( d = –0.46, P = 0.024; and d = –2.18, P = 0.001), scapular upward rotation at sagittal plane ( d = 0.33, P = 0.033; and d = 0.68, P = 0.001), scapular plane ( d = 0.18, P = 0.045; and d = 0.43, P = 0.001), scapular tilt at sagittal plane ( d = 0.55, P = 0.043; and d = 1.39, P = 0.001), and scapular plane ( d = 0.29, P = 0.034; and d = 0.58, P = 0.001). Therapeutic exercise alone was superior over control group in all significant outcomes ( P < 0.05). Conclusion: Although therapeutic exercises alone showed positive effect on clinical outcomes, adding Kinesio tape to therapeutic exercises had more significant effects with larger effect sizes. Adding Kinesio tape to therapeutic exercise may be of some assistance to clinicians in improving clinical outcomes in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome.

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Akhtar ◽  
Hossein Kirimi ◽  
Syed Amir Gilani ◽  
Ashfaq Ahmad

Background & Objective: Routine physiotherapy has been advocated was an effective treatment for internal shoulder impingement syndrome. However, there is lack of best exercise treatment and lots of studies are under consideration. The objective of the study was to compare the effects of Neuromobilization and routine physiotherapy on pain in patients having shoulder internal impingement syndrome. Methods: This is a single blinded randomized control clinical trial that was conducted at Social Security Hospital Gujranwala in which 80 patients with SIS were participated. The duration of study was from September 2016 to March 2018. Patients were recruited after giving an informed consent and were randomly assigned to either control or experimental group which was treated with routine physiotherapy and routine physiotherapy plus neuromobilization respectively; pain was assessed by Numeric Rating Scale at base line, 5th and 11th week. Results: The experimental group compared with control group at 11th week had lower mean pain score 2.15(1.66-2.64) vs 4.90(4.41-5.40); between group difference, 1.82; 95% (CI), -2.38 to -1.25; P < 0.001 and Partial ŋ2=0.33. These results show that pain score is much improved in experimental group. Conclusion: Neuromobilization along with physical therapy is more effective as compared to physiotherapy alone. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.4.1545 How to cite this:Akhtar M, Karimi H, Gilani SA, Ahmad A. Effects of routine physiotherapy with and without neuromobilization in the management of internal shoulder impingement syndrome: A randomized controlled trial. Pak J Med Sci. 2020;36(4):---------.  doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.4.1545 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Roma Rauf Chughtai ◽  
Farooq Azam Rathore

doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.1.3880 How to cite this: Chughtai RR, Rathore FA. Comments on Effects of routine physiotherapy with and without neuromobilization in the management of internal shoulder impingement syndrome: A randomized controlled trial. Pak J Med Sci. 2021;37(1):296-297. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.1.3880


2006 ◽  
Vol 86 (8) ◽  
pp. 1075-1090 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip W McClure ◽  
Lori A Michener ◽  
Andrew R Karduna

Abstract Background and Purpose. Several factors such as posture, muscle force, range of motion, and scapular dysfunction are commonly believed to contribute to shoulder impingement. The purpose of this study was to compare 3-dimensional scapular kinematics, shoulder range of motion, shoulder muscle force, and posture in subjects with and without primary shoulder impingement syndrome. Subjects. Forty-five subjects with impingement syndrome were recruited and compared with 45 subjects without known pathology or impairments matched by age, sex, and hand dominance. Methods. Shoulder motion and thoracic spine posture were measured goniometrically, and force was measured with a dynamometer. An electromagnetic motion analysis system was used to capture shoulder kinematics during active elevation in both the sagittal and scapular planes as well as during external rotation with the arm at 90 degrees of elevation in the frontal plane. Results. The impingement group demonstrated slightly greater scapular upward rotation and clavicular elevation during flexion and slightly greater scapular posterior tilt and clavicular retraction during scapular-plane elevation compared with the control group. The impingement group demonstrated less range of motion and force in all directions compared with the control group. There were no differences in resting posture between the groups. Discussion and Conclusion. The kinematic differences found in subjects with impingement may represent scapulothoracic compensatory strategies for glenohumeral weakness or motion loss. The decreased range of motion and force found in subjects with impingement support rehabilitation approaches that focus on strengthening and restoring flexibility.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (11_suppl3) ◽  
pp. 2325967114S0015
Author(s):  
Zeynep Hazar ◽  
Gul Baltacı

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of Throwers Ten (T10) exercise program on pain and function in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome. Methods: Twenty subjects who were assigned by random sampling to an experimental group (n=10) to which Throwers Ten (T10) exercise and a control group (n=10) to which ordinary physical treatment were applied. A 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the degree of pain. The Disability of Arm, Hand, and Shoulder (DASH) score was used to assess the functions of the upper extremity. To determine the range of motion, a universal goniometer was used to measure range of shoulder motion. Wilcoxon test was employed to examine differences in pain and function of the experimental group and the control group before and after the treatment. Results: There were significant differences in function and pain of the experimental group (p<0.05). The therapeutic effect in the experimental and control groups revealed significant differences in flexion, abduction, VAS and the DASH (p< 0.05); respectively. Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that Throwers Ten (T10) exercise would be positively affected pain alleviation and functional recovery in shoulder impingement patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document