Glenohumeral internal rotation deficit on pitching biomechanics and muscle activity

To characterize the scapular pitching biomechanics in symptomatic GIRD pitchers (SG) compared to asymptomatic GIRD (ASG) and healthy pitchers. The scapular kinematics and associated muscle activities during pitching were recorded in 33 high school pitchers. Compared to healthy, GIRD pitchers had less scapular posterior tilt in each pitching event (average difference, AD = 14.4°, p < 0.01) and ASG demonstrated less scapular upward rotation at ball release (AD = 12.8°, p < 0.01) and greater muscle activity in the triceps brachii in the early-cocking phase (AD = 9.9%, p = 0.015) and in the serratus anterior in the late-cocking phase (AD = 30.8%, p < 0.01). Additionally, SG had less muscular activity on triceps brachii in the acceleration phase and serratus anterior in the cocking phase (AD = 37.8%, p = 0.016; AD = 15.5%, p < 0.01, respectively) compared to ASG. GIRD pitchers exhibited less scapular posterior tilt during pitching, which may cause impingement. Since tightness of the anterior shoulder is a common cause of inadequacy of posterior tilt during arm elevation, stretching exercise of the anterior shoulder is recommended. Given the inadequate recruitment during pitching in the GIRD pitchers, symptoms may develop following potential impingement.

Reduced Movement Variability and Kinematics Changes During a Hand to Head Movement are Associated with Improved Outcome Following Superior Capsular Reconstruction (232)

Objectives: Patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears (RCT) exhibit functional limitations including limited ability to perform functional tasks such as combing their hair. One viable treatment is superior capsular reconstruction (SCR). SCR has been shown to restore stability of the glenohumeral (GH) joint in cadavers1, but its effect on in vivo scapular and humeral motion is unknown. The aims of this study were to determine the effect of SCR on in vivo scapular and humeral kinematics during a functional hand to head motion and to identify associations between shoulder kinematics and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). We hypothesized that moving the hand to the back of the head would be accomplished by using more GH based movement including rotation and abduction, and less scapular motion after SCR, and there would be a positive correlation between kinematics changes and improved PROs. Methods: Ten patients (8M, 2F, age 63 ± 7 years) with irreparable RCT provided informed consent to participate in this prospective IRB-approved study. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES), Disability of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH), and Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) surveys were completed before (PRE) and 1-year (1YR-POST) after SCR. Participants were seated and instructed to move their hand from their lap to the back of their head while synchronized biplane radiographs of the shoulder were collected PRE and 1YR-POST at 50 images/s for 3 separate trials. Six degree of freedom GH and scapular kinematics were determined with sub-millimeter accuracy by matching subject-specific CT-based bone models of the humerus and scapula to the synchronized radiographs using a validated volumetric tracking technique3. The contributions of humeral abduction, plane of elevation and internal/external (I/E) rotation relative to the scapula, as well as scapular upward rotation, protraction, and tilt, were calculated for each subject before and after SCR. Differences in rotational contributions from PRE to POST were evaluated using a paired t-test. Variability in rotational contributions was characterized by the inter-subject standard deviation in rotational component contributions to the movement. Correlations among changes in the contribution of each rotation component and between the contribution of each rotation component and PROs were evaluated with Pearson’s correlation coefficients. Significance was set at p < 0.05 for all tests. Results: No differences in contribution to motion were identified in any of the rotational components from PRE to POST (all p > 0.15, Figure 1). Inter-subject variability in rotational contributions to the movement decreased in 5 of the 6 rotational components from PRE to 1YR-POST (Table 1; Figure 1). The PRE to 1YR POST change in contribution from GH abduction was positively correlated to the change in contribution from GH I/E rotation (Figure 2, R = 0.8, p = 0.001) and negatively correlated to the change in contribution from scapular protraction (Figure 2, R = -0.94, p = 0.001). ASES scores were negatively correlated with abduction contribution PRE (R = -0.65, p = 0.043), and positively correlated with plane of elevation PRE (R = 0.685, p = 0.03). Changes in the plane of elevation contribution were also positively correlated with changes in ASES scores (R = 0.635, p = 0.048). Conclusions: This is the first study to report GH and scapular kinematics when performing the functional task of placing the hand to the back of the head. Changes in contributions to the motion were inconsistent across subjects, making it difficult to find differences from PRE to POST. However, inter-subject variation was reduced following surgery, suggesting the participants’ movement strategy converged toward a more similar and possibly more efficient movement pattern following SCR. Increased contributions of glenohumeral rotation and abduction were offset by decreased scapular protraction and indicates SCR affects the contributions from these three rotations, partially supporting our first hypothesis. In addition, increased GH plane of elevation contribution following surgery was associated with improved ASES scores supporting our second hypothesis. This may be consistent with improved glenohumeral kinematics and efficiency of movement during a functional task following SCR. Future work will investigate GH and scapular kinematics in healthy individuals performing the hand to head movement to determine if movement strategy is closer to healthy after SCR.

Exercise Programs Targeting Scapular Kinematics and Stability Are Effective in Decreasing Neck Pain: A Critically Appraised Topic

Clinical Scenerio: Neck pain is a costly symptom in both civilian and military worlds. While traditional treatments include deep neck flexor stabilizing exercises, manual therapy, electrical therapy, and other nonsurgical interventions, scapular orientation and stability training has emerged as a possible tool to reduce neck pain severity. Methods that can be coached at a distance could be of value in virtual appointments or circumstances where access to a qualified manual therapist is limited. Focused Clinical Question: What is the effectiveness of including exercise programs targeting scapular kinematics and stability to decrease neck pain? Summary of Key Findings: Exercise programs targeting scapular kinematics and stability, with coaching and individualized progressions, appear to reduce neck pain severity. Clinical Bottom Line: Evidence supports the inclusion of exercises for scapular kinematics and stability at a prescription of 3 sessions per week, with a duration of 4 or 6 weeks. Exercise programs should include a “learning” or coaching phase to ensure exercises are performed as intended, and exercise progressions should be based on participant ability rather than predetermined timelines. Further research is needed to better understand the benefits of this potential strategy and the statistical impact of scapular-focused exercise interventions on neck pain in specific populations like military and athletes. Strength of Recommendation: There is ‘Fair’ to ‘Good’ evidence from 2 level 1b single-blind randomized control studies and 1 level 2b pre-post test control design study supporting the inclusion of exercise programs targeting scapular kinematics and stability to decrease chronic neck pain severity.

Serratus Anterior Fatigue Reduces Scapular Posterior Tilt and External Rotation During Arm Elevation

Context: Fatigue of the scapular stabilizing muscles resulting from repeated arm motion has been reported to alter scapular kinematics, which could result in shoulder pathology, especially impingement. Objective: This study aimed to examine the effects of fatigue of the serratus anterior muscle on scapular kinematics, specifically, decrease scapular posterior tilt and upward scapular rotation during arm elevation. Design: Repeated measures. Setting: Laboratory. Participants: Thirty participants were included in the investigation. Interventions: Scapular kinematics and shoulder strength were measured before and immediately following a serratus anterior fatigue protocol. Main Outcome: Scapular 3-dimensional position during arm elevation. Results: No difference in upward rotation of the scapula between prefatigue and postfatigue conditions (ascending: P = .188; descending: P = .798). Scapular posterior tilt decreased during arm elevation following the fatigue protocol between 60° and 90° and 90° and 120° of arm elevation during the ascent (P = .004) and the descent (P = .013). Fatigue by arm elevation angle interaction was found for clavicular elevation during the ascent (P = .050) between 90° and 120° of arm elevation. Scapular internal rotation increased during the ascent (P = .027). There was no difference in clavicular protraction between the prefatigue and postfatigue conditions (ascending: P ≤ .001; descending: P ≤ .001). Conclusion: Fatigue of the serratus anterior decreases posterior scapular tilt and greater clavicular elevation and scapular internal rotation at higher arm elevation angles. These findings are consistent with the scapular kinematic patterns associated with shoulder pain. Improving serratus anterior endurance might delay the changes in scapular kinematics associated with repeated arm motion and shoulder injury mechanisms.

Which Specific Angle Measurement Criteria Should be Used to Define Forward Head and Rounded Shoulder Posture: An Evidence-Based Commentary

Postural distortions in the upper limb are prevalent and change the anatomical alignment, which alters force couples and the biomechanics of the body. Forward head posture (FHP) and rounded shoulder posture (RSP) are the two that are most prevalent. Measurement techniques using the craniovertebral angle for FHP and forward shoulder angle for RSP have been used both clinically and in the literature. However, what is not known is what specific criteria can be consistently used to define FHP and RSP as reference angles lack vigorous validity and there is a shortage of quantity, quality, and consistency of the evidence. Thus, there is much to be learned about postural classifications and the effect on the kinetic chain, supporting the need for further research in this area. As it is important to classify those who may need exercise and therapeutic intervention, following evidence-informed practice to inform decision-making clinicians should continue to evaluate posture, as well as examine scapular kinematics and muscle activity and the effects of interventions to improve posture. Therefore, determining whether FHP and RSP are present is paramount for the treatment to be successful.