Improving pulmonary vessel image quality with a full model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm in 80kVp low-dose chest CT for pediatric patients aged 0–6 years

2015 ◽  
Vol 56 (6) ◽  
pp. 761-768 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jihang Sun ◽  
Qifeng Zhang ◽  
Di Hu ◽  
Xiaomin Duan ◽  
Yun Peng
2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (8) ◽  
pp. 205846011666229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heloise Barras ◽  
Vincent Dunet ◽  
Anne-Lise Hachulla ◽  
Jochen Grimm ◽  
Catherine Beigelman-Aubry

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Davide Ippolito ◽  
Cammillo Talei Franzesi ◽  
Cecilia Cangiotti ◽  
Luca Riva ◽  
Andrea De Vito ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose: To evaluate the inter-observer agreement of the CAD-RADS reporting system and compare image quality between model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm (MBIR) and standard iterative reconstruction algorithm (IR) of low dose cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA). Methods: One-hundred-sixty patients undergone a 256-slice MDCT scanner using low-dose CCTA combined with prospective ECG-gated techniques were prospectively enrolled. CCTA protocols were reconstructed with both MBIR and IR. Each study was evaluated by two readers using the CAD-RADS lexicon. Vessels enhancement, image noise, SNR, and CNR were computed in the axial native images and inter-observer agreement was assessed. Radiation dose exposure as dose–length product (DLP) and effective dose (ED) were finally reported. Results: The overall agreement was very good (k = 0.90). Moreover, a significantly higher value of subjective qualitative analysis, SNR, and CNR in MBIR images compared to IR were found, due to a lower noise level (p<0.05). The mean DLP measured was 63.9 mGy*cm and the mean effective dose was 0.9 mSv.Conclusion: Inter-observer agreement of CAD-RADS was excellent confirming the importance, the feasibility, and the reproducibility of the CAD-RADS scoring system for CCTA. Moreover, lower noise and higher image quality with MBIR compared to IR were found.


2017 ◽  
Vol 59 (6) ◽  
pp. 740-747
Author(s):  
Marie-Louise Aurumskjöld ◽  
Marcus Söderberg ◽  
Fredrik Stålhammar ◽  
Kristina Vult von Steyern ◽  
Anders Tingberg ◽  
...  

Background In pediatric patients, computed tomography (CT) is important in the medical chain of diagnosing and monitoring various diseases. Because children are more radiosensitive than adults, they require minimal radiation exposure. One way to achieve this goal is to implement new technical solutions, like iterative reconstruction. Purpose To evaluate the potential of a new, iterative, model-based method for reconstructing (IMR) pediatric abdominal CT at a low radiation dose and determine whether it maintains or improves image quality, compared to the current reconstruction method. Material and Methods Forty pediatric patients underwent abdominal CT. Twenty patients were examined with the standard dose settings and 20 patients were examined with a 32% lower radiation dose. Images from the standard examination were reconstructed with a hybrid iterative reconstruction method (iDose4), and images from the low-dose examinations were reconstructed with both iDose4 and IMR. Image quality was evaluated subjectively by three observers, according to modified EU image quality criteria, and evaluated objectively based on the noise observed in liver images. Results Visual grading characteristics analyses showed no difference in image quality between the standard dose examination reconstructed with iDose4 and the low dose examination reconstructed with IMR. IMR showed lower image noise in the liver compared to iDose4 images. Inter- and intra-observer variance was low: the intraclass coefficient was 0.66 (95% confidence interval = 0.60–0.71) for the three observers. Conclusion IMR provided image quality equivalent or superior to the standard iDose4 method for evaluating pediatric abdominal CT, even with a 32% dose reduction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document