scholarly journals Plate fixation versus intramedullary fixation for midshaft clavicle fractures: Meta-analysis of complications and functional outcomes

2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 201-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hao Xiao ◽  
Hengbo Gao ◽  
Tuokang Zheng ◽  
Jianhui Zhao ◽  
Yingping Tian
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Intramedullary Fixation ◽  
Clavicle Fractures

scholarly journals Functional Outcomes and Complications of Intramedullary Fixation Devices for Midshaft Clavicle Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Hoogervorst ◽  
Tess van Dam ◽  
Nico Verdonschot ◽  
Gerjon Hannink
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Intramedullary Fixation ◽  
Common Complication ◽  
Fixation Device ◽  
Operative Strategy ◽  
Fixation Devices ◽  
Clavicle Fractures

Abstract Background An alternative to the current gold standard in operative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures (DMCF) using plate osteosynthesis, is internal fixation by means of intramedullary fixation devices. These devices differ considerably in their specifications and characteristics. The aim of this systematic review is to generate an overview of functional outcomes and complications in the management of DMCF per available intramedullary device.Methods A systematic review was conducted to identify all papers reporting functional outcomes, union rates and/or complications using an intramedullary fixation device for the management of midshaft clavicle fractures. Multiple databases and trial registries were searched from inception until February 2020. Meta-analysis was conducted based on functional outcomes and type of complication per type of intramedullary fixation device. Pooled estimates of functional outcomes scores and incidence of complications were calculated using a random effects model. Risk of bias and quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias and ROBINS-I tools. The confidence in estimates were rated and described according to the recommendations of the GRADE working group.Results Sixty-seven studies were included in this systematic review. The majority of studies report on the use of Titanium Elastic Nails (TEN). At 12 months follow up the Titanium Elastic Nail and Sonoma CRx report an average Constant-Murley score of 94.4 (95%CI 93-95) and 94.0 (95%CI 92-95) respectively (GRADE High). The most common reported complications after intramedullary fixation are implant-related and implant-specific. For the TEN, hardware irritation and protrusion, telescoping or migration, with a reported pooled incidence 20% (95%CI 14-26) and 12% (95%CI 8-18), are most common (GRADE Moderate). For the Rockwood/Hagie Pin, hardware irritation is identified as the most common complication with 22% (95%CI 13-35) (GRADE Low). The most common complication for the Sonoma CRx was cosmetic dissatisfaction in 6% (95%CI 2-17) of cases (GRADE Very low). Conclusion Although most studies were of low quality, good functional results and union rates irrespective of the type of device are found. However, there are clear device-related and device-specific complications for each. The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis can help guide surgeons in choosing the appropriate operative strategy, implant and informing their patient.

scholarly journals Functional Outcomes and Complications of Intramedullary Fixation Devices for Midshaft Clavicle Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Hoogervorst ◽  
Tess van Dam ◽  
Nico Verdonschot ◽  
Gerjon Hannink
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Plate Osteosynthesis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Functional Results ◽  
Intramedullary Fixation ◽  
Common Complication ◽  
Fixation Device ◽  
Operative Strategy ◽  
Clavicle Fractures

Abstract Background An alternative to the current gold standard in operative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures using plate osteosynthesis, is internal fixation by means of an intramedullary fixation device. These devices differ considerably in their specifications and characteristics and an adequate evaluation of their clinical results is warranted. Methods A systematic review was conducted to identify all papers reporting functional outcomes, union rates and/or complications using an intramedullary fixation device for the management of midshaft clavicle fractures. Multiple databases were searched from inception until January 2018. Meta-analysis was conducted based on functional outcomes and type of complication per type of intramedullary fixation device. Pooled estimates of functional outcomes scores and incidence of complications were calculated using a random effects model. Results Fifty-eight studies were included in this systematic review. The majority of studies report on the use of Titanium Elastic Nails (TEN). At 12 months follow up the titanium elastic nail and Sonoma CRx report an average Constant-Murley score of 94.2 (96%CI 93.2-95.3) and 93.4 (95%CI 92.1-94.7) respectively. The most common reported complications after intramedullary fixation are implant-related and implant-specific. For the TEN, hardware irritation and protrusion, telescoping or migration, with a reported pooled incidence of 20% (95%CI 14-27) and 13% (95%CI 9-20), are major contributors to the total complication rate. For the Rockwood/Hagie Pin, hardware irritation is identified as the most common complication with 21% (95%CI 11-35). The most common complication for the Sonoma CRx was cosmetic dissatisfaction in 7% (95%CI 2-22) of cases. Conclusion Although most studies were of low quality, in general, good functional results and union rates irrespective of the type of device are found in the reviewed literature. However, there are clear device-related and device-specific complications for each. The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis can help guide surgeons in choosing the appropriate operative strategy, implant and informing their patient.

scholarly journals Functional Outcomes and Complications of Intramedullary Fixation Devices for Midshaft Clavicle Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Hoogervorst ◽  
Tess van Dam ◽  
Nico Verdonschot ◽  
Gerjon Hannink
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Plate Osteosynthesis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Intramedullary Fixation ◽  
Common Complication ◽  
Fixation Device ◽  
Operative Strategy ◽  
Clavicle Fractures

Abstract Background: An alternative to the current gold standard in operative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures using plate osteosynthesis, is internal fixation by means of an intramedullary fixation device. These devices differ considerably in their specifications and characteristics and an adequate evaluation of their clinical results is warranted.Methods: A systematic review was conducted to identify all papers reporting functional outcomes, union rates and/or complications using an intramedullary fixation device for the management of midshaft clavicle fractures. Multiple databases and trial registries were searched from inception until February 2020. Meta-analysis was conducted based on functional outcomes and type of complication per type of intramedullary fixation device. Pooled estimates of functional outcomes scores and incidence of complications were calculated using a random effects model. Risk of bias and quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias and ROBINS-I tools. The confidence in estimates were rated and described according to the recommendations of the GRADE working group.Results: Sixty-seven studies were included in this systematic review. The majority of studies report on the use of Titanium Elastic Nails (TEN). At 12 months follow up the Titanium Elastic Nail and Sonoma CRx report an average Constant-Murley score of 94.4 (95%CI 93-95) and 94.0 (95%CI 92-95) respectively. The most common reported complications after intramedullary fixation are implant-related and implant-specific. For the TEN, hardware irritation and protrusion, telescoping or migration, with a reported pooled incidence 20% (95%CI 14-26) and 12% (95%CI 8-18), are major contributors to the total complication rate. For the Rockwood/Hagie Pin, hardware irritation is identified as the most common complication with 22% (95%CI 13-35). The most common complication for the Sonoma CRx was cosmetic dissatisfaction in 6% (95%CI 2-17) of cases. Conclusion: Although most studies were of low quality, in general, good functional results and union rates irrespective of the type of device are found in the reviewed literature. However, there are clear device-related and device-specific complications for each. The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis can help guide surgeons in choosing the appropriate operative strategy, implant and informing their patient.Level of Evidence IV

scholarly journals Plating versus intramedullary fixation for mid-shaft clavicle fractures: a systemic review and meta-analysis

PeerJ ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. e1540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Gao ◽  
Wei Chen ◽  
Yue-Jv Liu ◽  
Xu Li ◽  
Hai-Li Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Clavicle Fracture ◽  
Shoulder Function ◽  
Intramedullary Fixation ◽  
Systemic Review ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Union Rate ◽  
Fixation Group ◽  
Clavicle Fractures

Background.Plate fixation and intramedullary fixation are the most commonly used surgical treatment options for mid-shaft clavicle fractures; the latter method has demonstrated better performance in some studies.Objectives.Our aim was to critically review and summarize the literature comparing the outcomes of mid-shaft clavicle fracture treatment with plate fixation or intramedullary fixation to identify the better approach.Search Methods.Potential academic articles were identified from the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (1966-2015.5), PubMed (1966-2015.5), EMBASE (1980-2015.5) and ScienceDirect (1966-2015.5). Gray studies were identified from the references of the included literature.Selection Criteria.Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs comparing plate fixation and intramedullary fixation for mid-shaft clavicle fracture were included.Data Collection and Analysis.Two reviewers performed independent data abstraction. TheI2statistic was used to assess heterogeneity. A fixed- or random-effects model was used for the meta-analysis.Results.Six RCTs and nine non-RCTs were retrieved, including 513 patients in the intramedullary fixation group and 521 patients in the plating group. No significant differences in terms of the union rate and shoulder function were found between the groups. Patients in the intramedullary fixation group had a shorter operative time, less blood loss, smaller wound size, and shorter union time than those in the plating group. With respect to complications, significant differences were identified for all complications and major complications (wound infection, nonunion, implant failures, transient brachial plexopathy, and pain after 6 months). Similar secondary complications (symptomatic hardware, hardware irritation, prominence, numbness, hypertrophic callus) were observed in both groups.Conclusions.Intramedullary fixation may be superior to plate fixation in the treatment of mid-shaft clavicle fractures, with similar performance in terms of the union rate and shoulder function, better operative parameters and fewer complications.

Management of the mid-shaft clavicle fractures using plate fixation versus intramedullary fixation: an updated meta-analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 319-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanbin Zhu ◽  
Ye Tian ◽  
Tianhua Dong ◽  
Wei Chen ◽  
Fei Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Intramedullary Fixation ◽  
Clavicle Fractures
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document