Anterior Intercostal Artery Perforator Flap as a Simple Technique for Partial Breast Reconstruction: Our Institutional Initial Experience

2020 ◽  
Vol 106 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 40-40
Author(s):  
R Amira Maher ◽  
Ahmed Gamal Eldin Osman ◽  
K Fahmy ◽  
Nouf M. Ebied ◽  
Reda Eissa
Keyword(s):  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Perforator Flap ◽  
Cosmetic Outcome ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Intercostal Artery ◽  
Breast Size ◽  
Cancer Management ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Artery Perforator

Background: The oncoplastic surgery has brought new dimensions to breast conserving surgery and added the aesthetic principles of breast surgery to breast cancer management. Recently there's a lot of volume replacement techniques without significant donor site morbidity .The anterior intercostal artery perforator (AICAP) flap is a suitable option in partial breast reconstruction for lower pole tumors in small and medium sized breasts. Objectives: The aim of this study is to report our clinical experience with anterior intercostal perforator flap in partial breast reconstruction Methodology: 25 cases were performed between April 2018 to June 2019 at in Ain shams university hospitals for selected patients with lower breast pole tumors with small and medium sized breast and other option like reduction mMDTmoplasty wasn't favorable for them. Results: A total of 25 patient were selected by the multidisplinary team at Ain shams university hospital for partial breast reconstruction with anterior intercostal artery perforator flap . The mean age of the cases was 45.68 with mean body mass index of 32.32. The mean operative time for the flap was 64 minutes while the hospital stay was ranging from 1-2 days .Follow-up for local recurrence was from 6 to 14 months. There was 1 case with wound complication (4%). The cosmetic outcome was assessed by the MDT and a giving score from 1-5 was used with 1 is the least favorable cosmetic outcome and 5 is the best result 76% of the cases scored 5, 14% scored 4, 8% scored 3. According to patient satisfaction a score from 1 to 5 was used with the score 1 is least satisfied and score 5 represents the most satisfaction level, there was 80% of the patient gave the score 5, 12% of the cases gave the score 4 and 8% of the cases gave the score 3 Conclusions: Based on our experience, partial breast reconstruction using AICAP flap is a reliable option for lower breast tumors in small-to-moderate breast size with perfect cosmetic outcome and negligible rate of complication.

Use of the Vertical Profunda Artery Perforator Flap to Capture the Dominant Perforator: A Cadaver Dissection and Imaging Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jourdain D. Artz ◽  
Elisa K. Atamian ◽  
Clairissa Mulloy ◽  
Mark W. Stalder ◽  
Jamie Zampell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Donor Site ◽  
Perforator Flap ◽  
Imaging Study ◽  
Vessel Diameter ◽  
Pubic Tubercle ◽  
Computed Tomographic ◽  
Flap Design ◽  
Preoperative Magnetic Resonance ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Artery Perforator

Abstract Introduction While the originally described transverse profunda artery perforator (tPAP) flap is designed to capture the first profunda perforator, our group hypothesized the dominant perforator may not always be captured in this configuration. This study maps the location of dominant profunda perforators using imaging and cadaveric dissections to determine the probability of capturing dominant perforators with the transverse flap design versus the vertical PAP (vPAP) variant. Methods Fifty preoperative magnetic resonance angiogram or computed tomographic angiogram scans (100 total extremities) were examined from autologous breast reconstruction patients between 2015 and 2019. Profunda perforator characteristics that were examined included the distance from the pubic tubercle to the infragluteal fold (IGF), the distance of the perforators from the IGF, distance posterior to the gracilis, the diameter of the perforator at fascial exit, and total number of perforators present. Profunda perforator dissection was performed in 18 cadaveric extremities. Analysis included mean distance from pubic tubercle, distance posterior to the gracilis, diameter at fascial exit, and total number of perforators. Results In imaging analysis, the mean distance from the IGF to the fascial exit of all dominant perforators was 7.04 cm. The mean diameter of the dominant perforator at the fascial exit was 2.61 mm. Twenty-six thighs (26%) demonstrated dominant perforators that exited the fascia greater than 8 cm below the IGF. In cadaver dissections, the mean distance from the pubic tubercle to the fascial exit of all the dominant perforators was 10.17 cm. Nine cadaver specimens (50%) demonstrated perforators that exited the fascia greater than 8 cm below the estimated IGF. Conclusion The dominant perforator can often be missed in the traditional tPAP design. The vPAP incorporates multiple perforators with a long pedicle, excellent vessel diameter, and favorable donor-site.

Anterior intercostal artery perforator flap in immediate breast reconstruction: Anatomical study and clinical application

Microsurgery ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 603-610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristian Carrasco-López ◽  
Juan Francisco Julian Ibañez ◽  
Jordi Vilà ◽  
Miguel Angel Luna Tomás ◽  
Jordi Navinés López ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Clinical Application ◽  
Perforator Flap ◽  
Anatomical Study ◽  
Immediate Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Intercostal Artery ◽  
Artery Perforator

scholarly journals Reconstruction of the First Web Space Using the Wide-Second Dorsal Metacarpal Artery Perforator Flap

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Su Hyun Choi ◽  
Ho Jun Cheon ◽  
Sang Ho Oh ◽  
Sang Hyun Woo
Keyword(s):  
Donor Site ◽  
Perforator Flap ◽  
Extensor Retinaculum ◽  
Dorsal Metacarpal Artery ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Web Space ◽  
Normal Thickness ◽  
Excellent Color ◽  
Artery Perforator

Purpose: This study evaluated the functional and aesthetic outcomes of a wide-second dorsal metacarpal artery perforator flap for reconstruction of the first web space of the hand. This flap sets the proximal edge of the extensor retinaculum as the distal limit.Methods: We measured the preoperative and postoperative angles of the first web space and assessed the quality of the donor site scar in eight patients.Results: The average flap size was 5.5 × 2.8 cm (range, 5.0 × 1.5 cm to 5.0 × 6.0 cm), and all flaps survived completely. The mean postoperative angle was 53°. The mean Vancouver Scar Scale score of the donor site was 4 points, and the patients had near-normal thickness and vascularity values. There was no distortion of the scar, and patients were satisfied with the scar appearance of the donor site.Conclusion: The wide-second dorsal metacarpal artery perforator flap is a useful technique to reconstruct large defects of the first web space. It is easy to raise, thin, and pliable, and has excellent color and tissue matching.

Medium- and Large-Sized Autologous Breast Reconstruction using a Fleur-de-lys Profunda Femoris Artery Perforator Flap Design: A Report Comparing Results with the Horizontal Profunda Femoris Artery Perforator Flap

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (01) ◽  
pp. 008-014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Lhuaire ◽  
Kevin Haddad ◽  
Francesco-Saverio Wirz ◽  
Samah Abedalthaqafi ◽  
Déborah Obadia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Perforator Flap ◽  
Skin Surface ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Skin Paddle ◽  
Profunda Femoris Artery ◽  
Flap Design ◽  
Artery Perforator ◽  
Profunda Femoris

Background The volume of the profunda femoris artery perforator (PAP) flap limits its indications to small- and medium-sized breast reconstructions after modified radical mastectomy for cancer. We report a modified PAP flap design, including not only a vertical extension that increases its volume but also the skin surface, which suits larger breasts requiring immediate or delayed breast reconstructions and compare the results with our horizontal skin paddle PAP flap experience. Patients and Methods In our center between November 2014 and November 2016, 51 consecutive patients underwent a PAP flap breast reconstruction following breast cancer. A retrospective analysis on the collected data was performed to compare 34 patients with a bra cup smaller than C who underwent 41 horizontal PAP flap procedures, with those (n = 17) of a bra cup greater than or equal to C who underwent 21 fleur-de-lys PAP flap procedures. Demographic, anthropometric, flap and surgical characteristics, postoperative complication rates, and hospital stay were compared between the two groups. Results The average flap weight was 480 g (range: 340–735 g) for the fleur-de-lys PAP flap group compared with 222 g (range: 187–325 g) for the horizontal PAP flap procedure (p < 0.001). The mean flap dimensions were 25 × 18 cm for the fleur-de-lys PAP flap group compared with 25 × 7 cm in the horizontal PAP flap group. No flap failure was observed in the fleur-de-lys PAP flap group compared with two flap failures secondary to venous thrombosis in the horizontal PAP flap group (NS). Three patients (14%) experienced delayed healing at the donor site compared with four patients (10%) in the horizontal PAP flap group (NS). Conclusion The fleur-de-lys skin paddle design not only allows an increase of the horizontal PAP flap volume, but also increases the skin surface, with an acceptable donor site morbidity. For medium- or large-sized breasts, the fleur-de-lys PAP flap seems to be ideal when a DIEP flap-based reconstruction is contraindicated.

Donor Site Morbidity after Lumbar Artery Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dries Opsomer ◽  
Tom Vyncke ◽  
Michelle Ryx ◽  
Koenraad Van Landuyt ◽  
Phillip Blondeel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Perforator Flap ◽  
Significant Risk Factor ◽  
Donor Site Morbidity ◽  
Diep Flap ◽  
Lumbar Artery ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Artery Perforator

Abstract Background The lumbar artery perforator flap is a second-choice flap in autologous breast reconstruction whenever a deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is not possible. Ideal candidates are pear-shaped women who do not have enough bulk on the abdomen or thighs. Patient-reported “satisfaction with breasts” is excellent but we were curious about the donor site morbidity. Methods We performed a retrospective study of all lumbar flap breast reconstructions performed between 2010 and 2019. Patients were invited by e-mail and telephone to take part in a BREAST-Q survey. Results One hundred fifty-four flaps were performed in 110 patients. Sixty-three patients filled out the BREAST-Q questionnaire. The most frequently observed donor site complications are seroma (35.1%), dehiscence (8.4%), and hematoma (3.2%). Correction of the donor site scar was performed in 31.8% of patients, lipofilling of the donor flank in 5.2%, and liposuction of the contralateral flank in 18.3% of patients. Body mass index (BMI) was the only significant risk factor for donor site complications. Patient-reported “satisfaction with donor site appearance” was good but significantly lower for primary reconstructions compared with secondary and tertiary procedures. Flap weight significantly influences patient-reported “physical wellbeing of the donor site.” Ninety-seven percent of patients would recommend the surgery to someone in a similar position and would do it all over. Conclusion The lumbar artery perforator flap is a good alternative for breast reconstruction in selected patients. The donor site issues consist mainly of seromas, prolonged discomfort, and a scar that might be noticeable to others, but patient-reported satisfaction is very high.

A Multicentric Prospective Cohort Study of Modified Lateral Intercostal Artery Perforator Flap in Partial Breast Reconstruction

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Foteini Neamonitou ◽  
Dinesh Thekkinkattil ◽  
Aiswarya Sukumar ◽  
Lydia Prusty ◽  
Raghavan Vidya
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Perforator Flap ◽  
Intercostal Artery ◽  
Artery Perforator

Classification and Management of Donor-Site Wound Complications in the Profunda Artery Perforator Flap for Breast Reconstruction

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (02) ◽  
pp. 110-115
Author(s):  
Min-Jeong Cho ◽  
Sumeet S. Teotia ◽  
Nicholas T. Haddock
Keyword(s):  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Wound Care ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Perforator Flap ◽  
Wound Dehiscence ◽  
Wound Complications ◽  
P Value ◽  
Type I ◽  
Artery Perforator

Abstract Background Profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap breast reconstruction has emerged as a popular choice for patients who are not optimal candidates for autologous breast reconstruction using abdominal-based techniques such as the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap. Despite increased utilization of PAP flaps, there are no previous studies on the donor-site morbidity. In this study, we present risk factors, classification of thigh wounds, and our management of donor-site wounds. Methods Retrospective review of 69 patients who underwent PAP flap from 2013 to 2016 was performed. Demographic, patient characteristic, and flap data were collected. Postoperative photographs of donor sites were reviewed, and the wounds were classified into three types: type I—normal wound, type II—minor scab, and type III—dehiscence. Results Of the 69 patients (130 flaps), there were 13 patients (17 flaps) with wound dehiscence (13%), 8 patients with cellulitis (8.5%), 2 patients with seroma (3%), and 1 patient with hematoma (1.5%). The patients with wound dehiscence had statistically higher body mass index (BMI) (29.2 vs. 26.5) with p-value < 0.05 than the patients without wound complications. These patients had higher flap weight (514 vs. 439.7 g), were older (50.8 vs. 48.6 years old), and had a higher chance of being a diabetic (6 vs. 2%), but statistical significance was not achieved. The patients with dehiscence were managed with local wound care (63%), wound vacuum (26%), and operative intervention (11%). Conclusion Our study shows that BMI plays a significant role in the development of postoperative thigh wounds, and all wounds occurred at the medial thigh. However, the majority of the study population did not require any intervention, and revision of scar using the posterior thigh advancement flaps can be used to improve the gluteal aesthetics. We believe findings from our study can help plastic surgeons to counsel and assist patients who will undergo breast reconstruction with a PAP flap.

scholarly journals The Fleur-de-PAP Flap for Bilateral Breast Reconstruction

2016 ◽  
Vol 02 (01) ◽  
pp. e1-e3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katharine Saussy ◽  
Mark Stalder ◽  
Stephen Delatte ◽  
Robert Allen ◽  
Hugo St Hilaire
Keyword(s):  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Female Patient ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Perforator Flap ◽  
Autologous Reconstruction ◽  
Autologous Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Posterior Thigh ◽  
Single Donor ◽  
Ptotic Breasts ◽  
Artery Perforator

AbstractThe authors present the case of a 42-year-old female patient who underwent autologous breast reconstruction using a new perforator flap designed from the medial and posterior thigh. Due to a prior abdominoplasty, the patient's abdominal donor site was unavailable to reconstruct her large, ptotic breasts, so an alternate approach was undertaken. The fleur-de-PAP flap is based on the same perforators employed by the standard profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap, but simultaneously incorporates tissue from both the transverse and vertical PAP flap skin paddles. This design maximizes flap volume at a single donor site and provides a reasonable secondary option for autologous reconstruction in large-breasted patients in whom the abdomen is not available.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document