Time Required to Achieve Clinically Significant Outcomes After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (14) ◽  
pp. 3447-3453
Author(s):  
Brandon J. Manderle ◽  
Anirudh K. Gowd ◽  
Joseph N. Liu ◽  
Alexander Beletsky ◽  
Benedict U. Nwachukwu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Workers Compensation ◽  
Biceps Tenodesis ◽  
Distal Clavicle ◽  
Compensation Status ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff ◽  
Cuff Repair

Background: Recent literature has focused on correlating statistically significant changes in outcome measures with clinically significant outcomes (CSOs). CSO benchmarks are being established for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR), but more remains to be defined about them. Purpose: To define the time-dependent nature of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State (PASS) after RCR and to define what factors affect this time to CSO achievement. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: An institutional registry was queried for patients who underwent arthroscopic RCR between 2014 and 2016 and completed preoperative, 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Threshold values for MCID, SCB, and PASS were obtained from previous literature for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and subjective Constant score. The time in which patients achieved MCID, SCB, and PASS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. A Cox multivariate regression model was used to identify variables correlated with earlier or later achievement of CSOs. Results: A total of 203 patients with an average age of 56.19 ± 9.96 years and average body mass index was 30.29 ± 6.49 were included. The time of mean achievement of MCID, SCB, and PASS for ASES was 5.77 ± 1.79 months, 6.22 ± 2.85 months, and 7.23 ± 3.81 months, respectively. The time of mean achievement of MCID, SCB, and PASS for SANE was 6.25 ± 2.42 months, 7.05 ± 4.10 months, and 9.26 ± 5.89 months, respectively. The time of mean achievement of MCID, SCB, and PASS for Constant was 6.94 ± 3.85 months, 7.13 ± 4.13 months, and 8.66 ± 5.46 months, respectively. Patients with dominant-sided surgery (hazard ratio [HR], 1.363; 95% CI, 1.065-1.745; P = .014) achieved CSOs earlier on ASES, while patients with workers’ compensation status (HR, 0.752; 95% CI, 0.592-0.955; P = .019), who were current smokers (HR, 0.323; 95% CI, 0.119-0.882; P = .028), and with concomitant biceps tenodesis (HR, 0.763; 95% CI, 0.607-0.959; P = .021) achieved CSOs on ASES at later timepoints. Patients with distal clavicle excision (HR, 1.484; 95% CI, 1.028-2.143; P = .035) achieved CSOs earlier on SANE. Patients with distal clavicle excision (HR, 1.689; 95% CI, 1.183-2.411, P = .004) achieved CSOs earlier on Constant, while patients with workers’ compensation insurance status (HR, 0.671; 95% CI, 0.506-0.891; P = .006) and partial-thickness tears (HR, 0.410; 95% CI, 0.250-0.671; P < .001) achieved CSOs later on Constant. Greater preoperative score was associated with delayed achievement of CSOs for ASES, SANE (HR, 0.993; 95% CI, 0.987-0.999; P = .020), and Constant (HR, 0.941; 95% CI, 0.928-0.962; P < .001). Conclusion: A majority of patients achieved MCID by 6 months after surgery. Dominant-sided surgery and concomitant distal clavicle excision resulted in faster CSO achievement, while workers’ compensation status, concomitant biceps tenodesis, current smoking, partial-thickness rotator cuff tears, and higher preoperative PROMs resulted in delayed CSO achievement.

scholarly journals Disparities in Cost and Access by Caseload for Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: An Analysis of 18,616 Cases

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 232596711985050 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lambert Li ◽  
Steven L. Bokshan ◽  
Shayna R. Mehta ◽  
Brett D. Owens
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Distal Clavicle ◽  
Low Volume ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff ◽  
Cuff Repair

Background: Surgeon caseload has been shown to affect both health and economic outcomes in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Although previous studies have investigated disparities in access to care, little is known about disparities between low- and high-volume surgeons and facilities. Purpose: To identify where disparities may exist regarding access to high-volume surgeons and facilities. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: Univariate analysis was performed to analyze differences in the caseload between low- and high-volume surgeons and facilities. Cutoff values were set at 50 cases per year for high-volume surgeons and 125 cases annually for high-volume facilities. Multiple linear regression was then used to develop a cost model incorporating all variables significant under univariate analysis. We collected 18,616 cases with Current Procedural Terminology code 29827 (“arthroscopic rotator cuff repair”) from the 2014 Florida State Ambulatory Surgery and Services Databases. Results: A greater proportion of the caseload for low-volume surgeons and facilities was composed of patients who were of lower socioeconomic status, had government-subsidized insurance, or lived in areas with low-income ZIP codes. Low-volume surgeons and facilities also had higher total charges, higher postoperative admission rates, and lower distal clavicle excision rates ( P < .001). In our cost model, a low facility volume significantly increased costs. Subacromial decompression, postoperative admission, distal clavicle excision, male sex, and government-subsidized insurance were all significant factors for increased costs in multivariate cost analysis. Conclusion: There are disparities in access to high-volume surgeons and facilities for patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in Florida. Patients with a lower socioeconomic status, government-subsidized insurance, and low income all faced decreased access to these high-volume groups. High-volume surgeons and facilities were associated with lower total charges, higher rates of distal clavicle excision, and lower readmission rates. Low-volume facilities added a significant amount of cost, even when controlling for all other significant variables. It is important for providers to be aware of these disparities and work to address them in their own practices.

Biceps Tenodesis Combined With Rotator Cuff Repair Increases Functional Status And Elbow Strength In Both Operated And Contralateral Arms

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Ihsan KILIC ◽  
Onur HAPA ◽  
Ramadan OZMANEVRA ◽  
Nihat Demirhan DEMIRKIRAN ◽  
Onur GURSAN
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Constant Score ◽  
Elbow Flexion ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Biceps Tenodesis ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff ◽  
Cuff Repair

Abstract Purpose: Aim of the present study was to prospectively evaluate the elbow flexion and supination strengths, and the functional outcomes of patients after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair combined with simultaneous biceps tenodesis.Methods: Nineteen patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and biceps tenodesis with at least 24 months follow-up were included. Patients were evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS) for bicipital groove pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), and constant scores(CS), biceps apex distance (BAD), elbow flexion and supination strengths.Results: VAS for biceps groove measurement averages of postoperative 6th, 12th and 24th month were lower in comparison to pre-operative data and were considered to be statistically significant (p<0.05). Constant score, an average of all post-operative measurements and scores were found higher than pre-operative values and was considered to be statistically significant (p<0,01). There was a significant difference in the comparison of operated and contralateral forearm supination and elbow flexion muscle strength measurements at postoperative 3rd and 6th-month follow-up (p<0.01).Conclusion: Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis into the anchors of lateral row combined rotator cuff repair provides an increase in strength of elbow flexion and forearm supination, while decreases pain. Level of Evidence: Level IV

Establishing Maximal Medical Improvement After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 1000-1007 ◽  
Author(s):  
William A. Zuke ◽  
Timothy S. Leroux ◽  
Bonnie P. Gregory ◽  
Austin Black ◽  
Brian Forsythe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Orthopaedic Care ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff ◽  
Cuff Repair

Background: As health care transitions from a pay-for-service to a pay-for-performance infrastructure, the value of orthopaedic care must be defined accurately. Significant efforts have been made in defining quality and cost in arthroplasty; however, there remains a lag in ambulatory orthopaedic care. Purpose: Two-year follow-up has been a general requirement for reporting outcomes after rotator cuff repair. However, this time requirement has not been established scientifically and is of increasing importance in the era of value-based health care. Given that arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is a common ambulatory orthopaedic procedure, the purpose of this study was to establish a time frame for maximal medical improvement (the state when improvement has stabilized) after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Study Design: Systematic review. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted, identifying studies reporting sequential patient-reported outcomes up to a minimum of 2 years after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The primary clinical outcome was patient-reported outcomes at 3-month, 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year follow-up. Secondary clinical outcomes included range of motion, strength, retears, and complications. Clinically significant improvement was determined between various time intervals by use of the minimal clinically important difference. Results: The review included 19 studies including 1370 patients who underwent rotator cuff repair. Clinically significant improvement in patient-reported outcomes was seen up to 1 year after rotator cuff repair, but no clinical significance was noted from 1 year to 2 years. The majority of improvement in strength and range of motion was seen up to 6 months, but no clinically meaningful improvement was seen thereafter. All reported complications and the majority of retears occurred within 6 months after rotator cuff repair. Conclusion: After rotator cuff repair, a clinically significant improvement in patient-reported outcomes, range of motion, and strength was seen up to 1 year after surgery, but not beyond this. This information is important not only to establish appropriate patient expectations but also to determine a time frame for outcome collection after surgery to better define value in orthopaedic care.

scholarly journals Do patients receiving workers’ compensation who undergo arthroscopic rotator cuff repair have worse outcomes than non-recipients? Retrospective case–control study

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 230949901880250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyung Cheon Kim ◽  
Woo-Yong Lee ◽  
Hyun Dae Shin ◽  
Sun-Cheol Han ◽  
Kyu-Woong Yeon
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Workers Compensation ◽  
Vas Scores ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Cuff Repair

Purpose: We compared preoperative and postoperative measures among workers’ compensation board (WCB) recipients and non-recipients and determined the impact of WCB receipt on the 1- and 2-year outcomes of rotator cuff repair. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears who underwent arthroscopic repair between September 2011 and September 2014. Patients were divided into two groups based on WCB status: WCB recipients and non-recipients. All patients returned for follow-up functional evaluations at 1 and 2 years after the operation. Four outcome measures were evaluated: visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the Shoulder Rating Scale of the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA), and range of motion (ROM). Results: Seventy patients (38 males, 32 females) were evaluated, 20 of whom were WCB recipients. At 1 year after the operation, ASES, UCLA, and VAS scores as well as abduction ROM (Abd-ROM) had improved significantly in both groups. However, non-recipients showed significantly greater improvement than did WCB recipients in ASES, UCLA, and VAS scores and in forward flexion ROM and Abd-ROM ( p = 0.000, 0.009, 0.002, 0.046, and 0.020, respectively). However, at 2 years after the operation (after the end of WCB), there were no significant differences in any clinical outcome between WCB recipients and non-recipients ( p = 0.057, 0.106, 0.075, 0.724, and 0.787, respectively). Conclusion: Although workers’ compensation recipients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair had worse outcomes while receiving WCB benefits, the outcomes were similar after WCB benefits ended.

A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing the Interference Screw and Suture Anchor Techniques for Biceps Tenodesis

2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 440-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji Soon Park ◽  
Sae Hoon Kim ◽  
Ho Jin Jung ◽  
Ye Hyun Lee ◽  
Joo Han Oh
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Suture Anchor ◽  
Interference Screw ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Biceps Tenodesis ◽  
Work Level ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff ◽  
Cuff Repair

Background: Several methods are used to perform biceps tenodesis in patients with superior labrum-biceps complex (SLBC) lesions accompanied by a rotator cuff tear. However, limited clinical data are available regarding the best technique in terms of clinical and anatomic outcomes. Purpose: To compare the clinical and anatomic outcomes of the interference screw (IS) and suture anchor (SA) fixation techniques for biceps tenodesis performed along with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A total of 80 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with SLBC lesions were prospectively enrolled and randomly divided according to the tenodesis method: the IS and SA groups. Functional outcomes were evaluated with the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Constant score, Korean Shoulder Score (KSS), and long head of the biceps (LHB) score at least 2 years after surgery. The anatomic status of tenodesis was estimated using magnetic resonance imaging or ultrasonography, and the anatomic failure of tenodesis was determined when the biceps tendon was not traced in the intertubercular groove directly from the insertion site of the IS or SA. Results: Thirty-three patients in the IS group and 34 in the SA group were monitored for more than 2 years. All postoperative functional scores improved significantly compared with the preoperative scores (all P < .001) and were not significantly different between the groups, including the LHB score (all P > .05). Nine anatomic failures of tenodesis were observed: 7 in the IS group and 2 in the SA group ( P = .083). In a multivariate analysis using logistic regression, IS fixation ( P = .003) and a higher (ie, more physically demanding) work level ( P = .022) were factors associated with the anatomic failure of tenodesis significantly. In patients with tenodesis failure, the LHB score ( P = .049) and the degree of Popeye deformity by the patient and examiner ( P = .004 and .018, respectively) were statistically different compared with patients with intact tenodeses. Conclusion: Care must be taken while performing biceps tenodesis in patients with a higher work level; IS fixation appears to pose a higher risk in terms of the anatomic failure of tenodesis than SA fixation, although functional outcomes were not different.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document