Comparing the Efficacy of Kneeling Stress Radiographs and Weighted Gravity Stress Radiographs to Assess PCL Insufficiency: Response

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (8) ◽  
pp. NP29-NP30
Author(s):  
John A. Grant ◽  
Ryan Martin ◽  
Charles L. Holliday
Keyword(s):  
Stress Radiographs

scholarly journals Consistency and Reliability of Ankle Stress Radiography in Patients With Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 232596712110040
Author(s):  
Ji Hye Choi ◽  
Kug Jin Choi ◽  
Chin Youb Chung ◽  
Moon Seok Park ◽  
Ki Hyuk Sung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Tilt Angle ◽  
Ankle Instability ◽  
Interobserver Reliability ◽  
Initial Presentation ◽  
Lateral Ankle ◽  
Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability ◽  
Stress Radiographs ◽  
Lateral Ankle Instability

Background: Ankle stress radiographs are important tools for evaluating chronic lateral ankle instability. The consistency of a patient’s ankle condition as it affects the reliability of ankle stress radiographs has never been evaluated. Purpose: To investigate the consistency and reliability of ankle stress radiographs in patients with chronic lateral ankle instability without an ankle injury during the study period. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Included were patients with chronic lateral ankle instability who underwent 2 repeated ankle stress radiographs between January 2014 and July 2019; those with an ankle injury during the study period were excluded. The tibiotalar tilt angle on varus stress radiographs and anterior translation of the talus on anterior drawer stress radiographs were measured at initial presentation and final follow-up examination. Interobserver reliability and consistency of ankle stress radiographs were analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: A total of 45 patients (mean ± standard deviation age, 36.4 ± 13.4 years; 18 men and 27 women; follow-up duration, 9.1 ± 3.2 months) were included. The mean ± standard deviation tibiotalar tilt angle and anterior talar translation at initial presentation were 10.8° ± 5.2° and 6.9 ± 2.7 mm, respectively. The interobserver reliabilities of the tibiotalar tilt angle and anterior talar translation were excellent (ICC = 0.926 [95% CI, 0.874-0.959] and 0.911 [95% CI, 0.766-0.961], respectively). The consistency between the initial and final radiographs was good for tibiotalar tilt angle (ICC = 0.763 [95% CI, 0.607-0.862]) and poor for anterior talar translation (ICC = 0.456 [95% CI, 0.187-0.660]). Conclusion: Although the interobserver reliability of the radiographic measurements was excellent, the consistency of the ankle stress radiographs was not as acceptable. Surgeons need to be cautious when deciding whether to operate on a patient with chronic lateral ankle instability based on a single ankle stress radiograph.

scholarly journals Stress vs. Non-Stress Radiographs in Subtle Syndesmotic Injuries

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011418S0029
Author(s):  
Nicola Krähenbühl ◽  
Travis Bailey ◽  
Nathan Davidson ◽  
Heath Henninger ◽  
Charles Saltzman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ankle Instability ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Paired Comparison ◽  
Weight Bearing ◽  
Deltoid Ligament ◽  
Ankle Sprains ◽  
X Rays ◽  
Syndesmotic Injury ◽  
Stress Radiographs ◽  
Clear Space

Category: Sports Introduction/Purpose: Between 1-18% of all ankle sprains and 23% of all ankle fractures involve injury to the distal tibio-fibular syndesmosis. Syndesmotic injuries can create a substantial diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for orthopaedic surgeons. While acute injuries can be assessed using conventional radiographs, subtle syndesmotic injuries may be misdiagnosed using X-rays. Misdiagnoses may result in chronic ankle instability, pain and post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the tibio-talar joint. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether syndesmotic injury was more easily diagnosed with stress vs. non-stress radiographs.radiographs.sed with stress vs. non-stress radiographs. Methods: Five pairs of cadavers (tibia plateau to toe-tip, mean 61 years, range 52-70 years) were scanned with weight-bearing CT (170 lb, w/ and w/o 10 Nm static external rotation torque). Digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs), which are comparable to conventional radiographs, were reconstructed from the 3D CT data. The following conditions were tested: First, intact ankles (Native) were tested. Second, one specimen from each pair underwent AITFL resection, while the contralateral underwent deltoid resection (Condition 1). Third, the remaining intact deltoid ligament or AITFL was resected in each ankle (Condition 2). Finally, the interosseous membrane (IOM) was resected in all ankles (Condition 3). Condition 3 was defined as acute syndesmotic injury. Using antero-posterior (AP) views, the tibio-fibular clear space (TFCS), tibiofibular overlap (TFO) and medial clear space (MCS) were assessed. Statistical analysis was performed using paired (comparison within groups) and unpaired (comparison between groups) t-test where p=0.05 was considered significant. Results: Regarding the TFCS, Native vs. Condition 3 in 10 Nm stress radiographs was significantly different in the deltoid group (p=0.021). Using TFO in stress and non-stressed radiographs, Native vs. Condition 2 and 3 was significantly different for the deltoid group (p=0.043), and Native vs. Condition 3 in the syndesmotic group (p=0.027). Regarding the MCS in non-stress radiographs, Native vs. Condition 3 was significantly different in the deltoid group (p=0.007), while in stress views, Native vs. Condition 2 was significant different in the syndesmotic (p=0.026) and Native vs. Condition 3 in the deltoid group (p=0.030). No differences were found comparing the conditions of the AITFL with the same conditions of the deltoid group. Conclusion: The TFCS cannot be used to assess subtle or acute syndesmotic injuries in stress and non-stress radiographs. The TFO can be used to assess a combined injury to the AITFL and deltoid ligament in stress and non-stress radiographs. The MCS can be used to assess acute syndesmotic injuries in stress and non-stress radiographs. Radiographs (stress or non-stress) cannot be used to distinguish between injuries to the AITFL or deltoid ligament. Therefore, stress and non-stress radiographs are not useful in assessment of subtle syndesmotic injuries. Stress-radiographs are not superior compared to non-stress radiographs in assessment of acute syndesmotic injuries.

scholarly journals Do weight bearing radiographs estimate the stability of an isolated distal fibula fracture?

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011418S0052
Author(s):  
Sohail Yousaf ◽  
Daniel Hay
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Weight Bearing ◽  
Ankle Fractures ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Distal Fibula ◽  
Fibula Fracture ◽  
Stress Radiographs ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Supination External Rotation

Category: Trauma Introduction/Purpose: Differentiating stable isolated fibula fractures consistent with supination external rotation (SER) II ankle fractures from unstable SER IV fractures is essential in determining the need for surgical stabilisation. Stress radiographs are usually required to assess stability including gravity stress views (GSV) and external rotation views (ER). There is no clear consensus as to which modality is most useful to determine stability in a fracture clinic or emergency setting. In last, few years clinical uncertainty about the reliability has led researcher to focus on weight bearing radiographs (WB) .We aim to review recent literature regarding reliability of WB radiographs to estimate the stability of supination external rotation ankle fractures. Methods: A systematic review of the literature relating to radiological assessment of stability of supination external rotation ankle fractures was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. The systematic review was prospectively registered with PROSPERO. It involved the following steps: Researching the question-Do weight bearing radiographs estimate the stability of an isolated distal fibula fracture? Setting inclusion and exclusion criteria-All English language articles published in the including any Randomised controlled trials (RCT’s) and cohort studies. Data collection)– A literature search of Medline (PubMed), the Cochrane Bone, Joint, and Muscle Trauma Group trial register, the Cochrane central register of controlled trials, Embase and CINAHL was undertaken. The grey literature was searched. Key terms ‘supination external rotation fracture’, ‘stability’. Other variations to the key words were ‘weight bearing’, “axial load”, ‘stress x-rays’, ‘systematic reviews’ and ‘meta-analysis’. Results: A total of six studies met the inclusion criteria including 601 patients. No previous systematic review on stress radiographs including weight bearing was published. All studies concluded weight bearing radiographs is an easy, pain-free, safe and reliable method to estimate stability of isolated distal fibula fractures. No serious concerns or complications were reported. Conclusion: The evidence base contained many methodological limitations and most of the evidence was either level III or IV, and so any conclusion drawn from the research must be done so with caution. The studies suggest that GSV overestimates the instability which should be assessed with studies should focus on randomized controlled trials with narrow range of clinically useful outcome measures.

Technical Repeatability and Reproducibility of the Stress Radiographs Performed with the Vezzoni-Modified Badertscher Hip Distension Device

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (01) ◽  
pp. 067-072 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lieve De Rycke ◽  
Aldo Vezzoni ◽  
Ingeborgh Polis ◽  
Jimmy Saunders ◽  
Bart Broeckx ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Significance ◽  
Hip Joint ◽  
Evaluation Method ◽  
Limits Of Agreement ◽  
Stress Radiographs ◽  
Technical Reproducibility ◽  
Repeatability And Reproducibility ◽  
Measurement Repeatability

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of the radiographical stress technique using the Vezzoni-modified Badertscher distension device (VMBDD). Materials and Methods Stress radiographs of 10 dogs obtained with the VMBDD were performed consecutively by two different operators and then measured twice by a third veterinarian. The technical repeatability was first assessed individually for the two operators who took the stress radiographs, followed by the technical reproducibility. The obtained variances were used to calculate the 95% limits of agreement for the measurement repeatability, the technical repeatability and the technical reproducibility. Results Both the technical repeatability and reproducibility of the VMBDD technique were good, with the 95% limits of agreement of the measurement repeatability and technical repeatability equalling ± 0.07 overall, and the 95% limits of agreement of the technical reproducibility being ± 0.09. Clinical Significance These results, in combination with the previous results for the measurement of the laxity index, support the use of the VMBDD as a reliable in-house evaluation method to assess the hip joint by trained clinicians. For screening purposes, however, we suggest to limit the number of evaluators, to limit the variability.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document