Lipid-Lowering Effects of Fluvastatin in Renal Transplant Patients. A Clinical Observation

1997 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.M. Lal ◽  
N. Gupta ◽  
O. Georgiev ◽  
G. Ross
Keyword(s):  
Renal Transplant ◽  
Low Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Heart Association ◽  
Term Treatment ◽  
Lipoprotein Cholesterol ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Short Term Treatment ◽  
Transplant Patients ◽  
Renal Transplant Patients

A Atherosclerosis-related cardiovascular disease remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality in renal transplant patients. We assessed the efficacy and safety of the newer synthetic HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, fluvastatin, in 12 renal transplant patients who remained hypercholesterolemic, despite having been on the American Heart Association (AHA) Step I diet for 6 weeks. At 8 weeks, compared to the control phase, fluvastatin therapy, 20 mg/day, reduced the total cholesterol (TC) from 321 ± 57 [± SD] to 301 ± 123 mg/dl (p=0.3); low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), from 209 ± 56 to 176 ± 81 mg/dl (p=0.2); and the triglyceride (TG) levels from 343 ± 119 to 277 ± 117 mg/dl (p=0.06); all these changes were statistically insignificant. However, the therapy significantly increased the high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) from 37 ± 11 to 46 ± 13 mg/dl (p=0.006). During this short-term treatment period no adverse biochemical effects were noted with the therapy.

scholarly journals Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Renal Transplant Patients: Cyclosporin AVersusTacrolimus

2001 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 368-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
GERRY LIGTENBERG ◽  
RONALD J. HENÉ ◽  
PETER J. BLANKESTIJN ◽  
HEIN A. KOOMANS
Keyword(s):  
Renal Transplant ◽  
Low Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Cardiovascular Morbidity ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Renal Transplant Recipients ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Transplant Patients ◽  
Renal Transplant Patients

Abstract. The hypertensive and hyperlipidemic effects of cyclosporin A (CsA) may contribute to the high cardiovascular morbidity in renal transplant patients and to the development of chronic transplant nephropathy. Tacrolimus is reported to have less effect on BP and lipids, but steroids, other drugs, and renal function may confound this. This study assessed 24-h BP and lipid profile in stable renal transplant recipients (n= 17) while they were receiving CsA, after 4 wk of receiving tacrolimus, and again after 4 wk of receiving CsA. Antihypertensives were stopped at least 3 wk before. A few patients used low-dose steroids and lipid-lowering drugs, which were not changed during the study. Mean daytime BP decreased from 149 ± 12 and 95 ± 8 mmHg to 138 ± 13 and 87 ± 9 mmHg (P< 0.001) after patients were switched to tacrolimus. Mean nighttime BP also decreased, from 140 ± 12/86 ± 7 mmHg to 132 ± 17/79 ± 10 mmHg (P< 0.05). Total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol decreased from 6.1 ± 0.7 and 3.84 ± 0.79 mmol/L to 5.1 ± 0.8 and 2.98 ± 0.75 mmol/L (P< 0.001). Return to CsA caused an increase in BP and cholesterol to values similar as during the first CsA period. The conclusion is that tacrolimus has fewer unfavorable effects on BP and lipids than does CsA. Elective conversion from CsA to tacrolimus in stable renal transplant recipients may lead to attenuation of cardiovascular morbidity and chronic transplant nephropathy in the long term.

scholarly journals A prospective study on treatment of hypercholesterolemia with lovastatin in renal transplant patients receiving cyclosporine.

1993 ◽  
Vol 3 (12) ◽  
pp. 1884-1891
Author(s):  
A K Cheung ◽  
G A DeVault ◽  
M C Gregory
Keyword(s):  
Renal Transplant ◽  
Low Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Plasma Concentrations ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Normal Subjects ◽  
Lipoprotein Cholesterol ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Renal Transplant Recipients ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Cardiovascular Morbidity And Mortality

Hypercholesterolemia occurs commonly in renal transplant recipients and may contribute to the high cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in these patients. Although an effective hypolipidemic agent, lovastatin has been associated with rhabdomyolysis and acute renal failure in patients on cyclosporin A (CsA). In this study, lovastatin was administered at 10 mg/day for 8 wk followed by 20 mg/day for 12 wk to six renal transplant recipients who were receiving CsA concomitantly. The 10-mg/day dose was effective, but an additional lipid-lowering effect was seen with the 20-mg/day dose. Both serum total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels decreased by 27% at the end of the 20 wk of lovastatin administration. Serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride levels remained unchanged. No significant clinical or laboratory adverse effects were observed, including muscular symptoms, ophthalmologic abnormalities, or alterations in serum creatine kinase, urea nitrogen, creatinine, transaminases, and CsA levels. Peak and trough plasma concentrations of active lovastatin were comparable to those reported in normal subjects receiving a higher lovastatin dose without CsA. It was concluded that the administration of low-dose (10 to 20 mg/day) lovastatin to renal transplant recipients receiving concomitant CsA can be safe and effective in lowering serum cholesterol.

scholarly journals Fluvastatin and low-density lipoprotein oxidation in hypercholesterolemic renal transplant patients

1999 ◽  
Vol 56 ◽  
pp. S231-S234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Martínez-Castelao ◽  
Josep M. Grinyó ◽  
Concepció Fiol ◽  
María J. Castiñeiras ◽  
Isabel Hurtado ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Transplant ◽  
Low Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Low Density ◽  
Lipoprotein Oxidation ◽  
Transplant Patients ◽  
Renal Transplant Patients ◽  
Low Density Lipoprotein Oxidation

scholarly journals U-Shaped Relationship of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol With Risk of Severe COVID-19 From a Multicenter Pooled Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiao Gong ◽  
Yaqiong Chen ◽  
Yusheng Jie ◽  
Mingkai Tan ◽  
Zhaofang Jiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Lipoprotein Cholesterol ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Low Density ◽  
Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol ◽  
Odds Ratios ◽  
Lowering Therapy ◽  
Severe Group

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is a well-known risk factor for coronary heart disease but protects against infection and sepsis. We aimed to disclose the exact association between LDL-C and severe 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Baseline data were retrospectively collected for 601 non-severe COVID-19 patients from two centers in Guangzhou and one center in Shenzhen, and patients on admission were medically observed for at least 15 days to determine the final outcome, including the non-severe group (n = 460) and the severe group (severe and critical cases) (n = 141). Among 601 cases, 76 (12.65%) received lipid-lowering therapy; the proportion of patients taking lipid-lowering drugs in the severe group was higher than that in the non-severe group (22.7 vs. 9.6%). We found a U-shaped association between LDL-C level and risk of severe COVID-19 using restricted cubic splines. Using univariate logistic regression analysis, odds ratios for severe COVID-19 for patients with LDL-C ≤1.6 mmol/L (61.9 mg/dL) and above 3.4 mmol/L (131.4 mg/dL) were 2.29 (95% confidence interval 1.12–4.68; p = 0.023) and 2.02 (1.04–3.94; p = 0.039), respectively, compared to those with LDL-C of 2.81–3.40 mmol/L (108.6–131.4 mg/dL); following multifactorial adjustment, odds ratios were 2.61 (1.07–6.37; p = 0.035) and 2.36 (1.09–5.14; p = 0.030). Similar results were yielded using 0.3 and 0.5 mmol/L categories of LDL-C and sensitivity analyses. Both low and high LDL-C levels were significantly associated with higher risk of severe COVID-19. Although our findings do not necessarily imply causality, they suggest that clinicians should pay more attention to lipid-lowering therapy in COVID-19 patients to improve clinical prognosis.

Abstract P43: Frequency and Predictors of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Control and Appropriate Response to Elevated LDL-C Levels in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease

2011 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Salim S Virani ◽  
Lechauncy D Woodard ◽  
Supicha Sookanan ◽  
Cassie R Landrum ◽  
Tracy H Urech ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Low Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Medication Possession Ratio ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Lipoprotein Cholesterol ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Low Density ◽  
Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol ◽  
To Receive

Background: Although current cholesterol performance measures define good quality as low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels < 100mg/dl in cardiovascular disease (CVD) patients, they provide a snap shot at one time point and do not inform whether an appropriate action was taken to manage elevated LDL-C levels. We assessed frequency and predictors of this appropriate response (AR). Methods: We used administrative data to assess 22,902 CVD patients receiving care in a Veterans Affairs network of 7 hospitals and affiliated clinics. We determined the proportion of CVD patients at LDL-C goal <100 mg/dl, and the proportion of patients with uncontrolled LDL-C levels (>100 mg/dl) who had an AR [defined as the initiation or dosage increase of a lipid lowering medication (LLM), addition of a new LLM, receipt of maximum dosage or >1 LLM, or LDL-C reading <100 mg/dl] at 45 days follow-up. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate facility, provider and patient characteristics associated with AR. Results: LDL-C levels were at goal in 16,350 (71.4%) patients. An additional 2,110 (9.2%) had an AR at 45 days of follow-up. Controlling for clustering between facilities and patient's illness severity, history of diabetes (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.03-1.35), hypertension (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.02-1.44), patients showing good medication adherence (medication possession ratio > 0.8) [OR 2.29, 95% CI 1.99-2.64] were associated with AR. Older CVD patients (age >75 years) were less likely to receive AR (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.52-0.70). Teaching vs. non-teaching facility (p=0.40), physician vs. non-physician provider (p=0.14), specialist vs. non-specialist primary care provider (p=0.12), and patient's race (p=0.12) were not predictors of AR. Conclusion: Among patients with CVD and LDL-C above guideline recommended levels, only one-third receive AR. Diabetic and hypertensive CVD patients are more likely to receive AR, whereas older Veterans with CVD receive AR less often likely reflecting providers' belief of lack of efficacy from treatment intensification in older CVD patients. Our findings are important for quality improvement and policy making initiatives as they provide more actionable information compared with isolated LDL-C goal attainment as a quality indicator.

Comparison of LDL-C calculation by friedewald and martin/hopkins methods in 12,243 adults from the United States of America

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Penson ◽  
S.S Martin ◽  
N.C Henney ◽  
M Banach
Keyword(s):  
Low Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Threshold Value ◽  
The United States ◽  
Lipoprotein Cholesterol ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Low Density ◽  
Strongly Correlated ◽  
Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol

Abstract Background Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is an established risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD), and a target for lipid-lowering therapy. LDL-C is typically not measured directly but is estimated using the Friedewald formula, which assumes a fixed factor for the ratio of triglycerides (TG) to very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C). However this assumption is sometimes not valid. The Martin/Hopkins (M/H) formula estimates LDL-C using an adjustable factor for the TG:VLDL-C ratio and is expected to improve upon Friedewald when predicting measured LDL-C, and apolipoprotein B (ApoB), one molecule of which is associated with each LDL particle. Purpose We compared values of LDL-C calculated by the Friedewald and M/H methods with respect to their correlation with non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) and ApoB, and their classification of individuals based upon attainment of the threshold value of 70 mg/dl (1.8 mmol/l) of LDL-C. This cut-point is a treatment target for individuals at high risk of CVD in the 2019 ESC guidelines for lipid modification, and a threshold for initiating statin therapy in the 2019 ACC/AHA guidelines. Methods In this analysis we included participants in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2005–2016, age ≥18, &lt;80 years who had measurements for total cholesterol (TC), TG and HDL-C. LDL-C was calculated using Friedewald and M/H. We correlated LDL-C (calculated using the two methods) with non-HDL-C and ApoB. We identified individuals with LDL-C &lt;70 mg/dl using both methods. When LDL-C (Friedewald) was &lt;70, but LDL-C (M/H) was &gt;70, we classified these participants as discordant. Statistical analyses were performed in IBM SPSS for Windows v26. Results 12,243 individuals were included. 51.8% were female, mean (±SD) age was 45.5±17.4, 15.3% were treated with statins, ApoB was available for 2179 participants. Mean lipid concentrations (mg/dl) were: TC: 191.5±41.0, TG: 120.0±67.0, HDL-C: 54.1±15.7, LDL-C (Friedewald): 113.3±35.4; LDL-C (M/H): 114.9±35.2. In the whole population, LDL-C (M/H) was more strongly correlated than LDL-C (Friedewald) with ApoB (r=0.935 v 0.894) and non-HDL-C (r=0.981 v 0.944). In statin-treated participants, LDL-C (M/H) was also more strongly correlated with ApoB (r=0.951 v 0.914) and non-HDL-C (r=0.979 v 0.928). 1139 participants had LDL-C (Friedewald) &lt;70 mg/dl. Of these, 206 individuals (18.1%) were discordant, having LDL-C (M/H) &gt;70 mg/dl. Amongst statin-treated patients, 22.9% were discordant. Only 5.5% of individuals with LDL-C (M/H) &lt;70 mg/dl showed reverse discordance (LDL-C (Friedewald) &gt;70 mg/dl). Conclusions The M/H method of calculating LDL-C correlates more strongly with non-HDL-C and ApoB than Friedewald. Importantly the discordant results confirm previous observations that Friedewald underestimates LDL-C at low concentrations. This may result in under-use of lipid-lowering therapies. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document