Depression in Primary Care—More like Asthma Than Appendicitis: The Michigan Depression Project

1997 ◽  
Vol 42 (9) ◽  
pp. 966-973 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael S Klinkman ◽  
Thomas L Schwenk ◽  
James C Coyne

Objective: To explore the relationships between detection, treatment, and outcome of depression in the primary care setting, based upon results from the Michigan Depression Project (MDP). Methods: A weighted sample of 425 adult family practice patients completed a comprehensive battery of questionnaires exploring stress, social support, overall health, health care utilization, treatment attitudes, self-rated levels of stress and depression, along with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III (SCID), which served as the criterion standard for diagnosis. A comparison sample of 123 depressed psychiatric outpatients received the same assessment battery. Family practice patients received repeated assessment of depressive symptoms, stress, social support, and health care utilization over a period of up to 60 months of longitudinal follow-up. Results: The central MDP findings confirm that significant differences in past history, severity, and impairment exist between depressed psychiatric and family practice patients, that detection rates are significantly higher for severely depressed primary care patients, and that clinicians use clinical cues such as past history, distress, and severity of symptoms to “detect” depression in patients at intermediate and mild levels of severity. As well, there is a lack of association between detection and improved outcome in primary care patients. Conclusion: These results call into question the assumption that “depression is depression” irrespective of the setting and physician, and they are consistent with a model of depressive disorder as a subacute or chronic condition characterized by clinical parameters of severity, staging, and comorbidity, similar to asthma. This new model can guide further investigation into the epidemiology and management of mood disorders in the primary care setting.

2008 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa A. Polusny ◽  
Barry J. Ries ◽  
Jessica R. Schultz ◽  
Patrick Calhoun ◽  
Lisa Clemensen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
DAVID T LISS ◽  
Adriana Guzman ◽  
Emily Walsh ◽  
Sara Shaunfield ◽  
Tiffany Brown

Background: There are few if any well-known approaches to reducing avoidable health care utilization and costs in patients with social needs. This study's objective was to explore the goals, and approaches to organizing and delivering care, of interventions attempting to reduce avoidable resource use by addressing patients' medical and social needs. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with study investigators about early interventions in the peer-reviewed literature. A template analysis approach was used to review interview transcripts for common themes and create a final code list. Coder dyads separately coded each interview and resolved any discrepancies. Results: Interviews were conducted with 15 investigators of interventions that delivered a variety of health services and addressed several individual social needs. Participants frequently described their overall goal as meeting patients' diverse needs to prevent unnecessary acute care utilization. Reported approaches to addressing medical needs included assistance with receipt of primary care and care coordination across settings. Social needs were described as tightly linked with medical needs; addressing social support and housing were perceived as distinct from addressing other social needs. Participants described their overall approach to meeting patients' needs in terms of establishing connections, partnership, respect, and being adaptable to patients' priorities. Conclusions: Findings shed new light on how to simultaneously address medical and social needs. Opportunities for future research include evaluating different approaches to addressing medical needs (primary care versus care coordination), separately evaluating the impacts of housing or social support, and hiring and training procedures to promote trauma-informed, patient-centered care.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 239-247
Author(s):  
Tamara K Oser ◽  
Siddhartha Roy ◽  
Jessica Parascando ◽  
Rebecca Mullen ◽  
Julie Radico ◽  
...  

Medical Care ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 27 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S99-S109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia E. Connelly ◽  
John T. Philbrick ◽  
G Richard Smith ◽  
Donald L. Kaiser ◽  
Antoinette Wymer

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document