A Comparison of Emergency Preparedness Policies by Long-Term Care Setting Type in Ohio: Assisted Living Settings Lag Behind Nursing Homes in Key Areas

2020 ◽  
pp. 073346482090201
Author(s):  
Katherine A. Kennedy ◽  
Cassandra L. Hua ◽  
Ian Nelson
Keyword(s):  
Assisted Living ◽  
Emergency Preparedness ◽  
Disaster Preparedness ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Nursing Facilities ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Skilled Nursing ◽  
Care Facilities

Skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) have received regulatory attention in relation to their emergency preparedness. Yet, assisted living settings (ALs) have not experienced such interest due to their classification as a state-regulated, home- and community-based service. However, the growth in the number of ALs and increased resident acuity levels suggest that existing disaster preparedness policies, and therefore, plans, lag behind those of SNFs. We examined differences in emergency preparedness policies between Ohio’s SNFs and ALs. Data were drawn from the 2015 wave of the Ohio Biennial Survey of Long-Term Care Facilities. Across setting types, most aspects of preparedness were similar, such as written plans, specifications for evacuation, emergency drills, communication procedures, and preparations for expected hazards. Despite these similarities, we found SNFs were more prepared than large ALs in some key areas, most notably being more likely to have a backup generator and 7 days of pharmacy stocks and generator fuel.

scholarly journals USING A UNIVERSAL SATISFACTION SCORE IN LONG-TERM CARE SETTINGS

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S744-S744
Author(s):  
Nicholas Castle ◽  
Lindsay Schwartz ◽  
David Gifford
Keyword(s):  
Assisted Living ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Pay For Performance ◽  
Psychometric Testing ◽  
Satisfaction Score ◽  
Nursing Facilities ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Skilled Nursing ◽  
National Quality

Abstract The CoreQ (not an acronym) consists of a limited number of satisfaction items (3-4 items, depending on setting) that are used to create an overall satisfaction score for long-term care facilities. This measure has been used in assisted living (AL) and skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) and has been endorsed by the National Quality Forum (NQF). Briefly, the development and psychometric testing of the CoreQ will be described, including the rationale for producing an overall satisfaction score and correlation with important quality indicators like Five-Star. Using data collected over the past 3 years, comprising more than 100,000 respondents, the use of the CoreQ measure will be described. For example, the CoreQ scores are used in MA to allow providers to benchmark their performance. The use of the scores in this way will be discussed including how providers have used the scores for quality improvement. Some states have elected to use CoreQ in pay for performance and other state initiatives. A case study of how New Jersey uses CoreQ with SNFs will be presented, including distribution of scores and addressing data collection challenges. CoreQ can be utilized as a short customer satisfaction measure to allow providers to benchmark their performance, residents and families in decision-making, and states and others to use for accountability.

scholarly journals COVID-19 Across the Landscape of Long-Term Care in Alameda County: Heterogeneity and Disparities

2022 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 233372142110734
Author(s):  
Terry E. Hill ◽  
David J. Farrell
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Nursing Facilities ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Skilled Nursing ◽  
Data Infrastructure ◽  
Care Facilities

Throughout the pandemic, public health and long-term care professionals in our urban California county have linked local and state COVID-19 data and performed observational exploratory analyses of the impacts among our diverse long-term care facilities (LTCFs). Case counts from LTCFs through March 2021 included 4309 (65%) in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), 1667 (25%) in residential care facilities for the elderly (RCFEs), and 273 (4%) in continuing care retirement communities (CCRCs). These cases led to 582 COVID-19 resident deaths and 12 staff deaths based on death certificates. Data on decedents’ age, race, education, and country of birth reflected a hierarchy of wealth and socioeconomic status from CCRCs to RCFEs to SNFs. Mortality rates within SNFs were higher for non-Whites than Whites. Staff accounted for 42% of LTCF-associated COVID-19 cases, and over 75% of these staff were unlicensed. For all COVID-19 deaths in our jurisdiction, both LTCF and community, 82% of decedents were age 65 or over. Taking a comprehensive, population-based approach across our heterogenous LTCF landscape, we found socioeconomic disparities within COVID-19 cases and deaths of residents and staff. An improved data infrastructure linking public health and delivery systems would advance our understanding and potentiate life-saving interventions within this vulnerable ecosystem.

scholarly journals Adapting Mindfulness-Based Interventions for Residents of Long-Term Care Facilities

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 233372142110577
Author(s):  
Christian Terry ◽  
Michael Penland ◽  
Devon Garland ◽  
Wendy Wang ◽  
Taylor Burton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Long Term Care ◽  
Nursing Facilities ◽  
Traditional Group ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Skilled Nursing ◽  
Healthy Older Adults ◽  
Care Facilities ◽  
States Data ◽  
Full Day

Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) have received increased clinical attention in recent years. While some MBI research has focused on healthy older adults, research with more emotionally and physically vulnerable populations, such as residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs), is lacking. The current paper presents quantitative and qualitative results from a pilot study of an individual MBI designed for residents of LTCFs. Participants included 8 residents from two skilled nursing facilities in the southeastern United States. Data were collected between October 2016 through June 2017. A modified MBI is proposed with specific adaptations for LTCF residents. Recommended adaptations for LTCFs include a shift from a group to an individual format, individual weekly instructor–participant meetings, removal of the yoga and full-day silent retreat and shortening the duration of the formal practices. The current study found that these adaptations result in an individual MBI that is accessible to most LTCF residents while still providing the associated benefits of traditional group MBIs.

scholarly journals ABUSE, NEGLECT, AND EXPLOITATION IN ASSISTED LIVING: AN EXAMINATION OF LONG-TERM CARE OMBUDSMAN COMPLAINT DATA

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S477-S477
Author(s):  
Karen Magruder ◽  
Ling Xu ◽  
Noelle L Fields
Keyword(s):  
Assisted Living ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Elder Abuse ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Empirical Literature ◽  
Nursing Facilities ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Skilled Nursing

Abstract Adult Protective Services (APS) has seen cases of elder abuse increase recently and older adults living in long-term care facilities are subject to abuse, neglect and exploitation (ANE) at higher rates than community-dwelling seniors. However, there is scant empirical literature about ANE in assisted living (AL) settings and skilled nursing facilities (SNFs). The purpose of this study is to examine ANE complaints in AL and SNFs as recorded by Long-term Care Ombudsman Programs (LTCOPs) utilizing secondary data from a statewide database as well as an agency database used by staff ombudsmen who work in a large Metropolitan city in Texas. The sample included 140,497 complaints made at 1,940 licensed ALs with approximately 45,107 residents and 1,231 SNFs with 93,932 residents in Texas from 2010-2017. The percent of total complaints coded as ANE was higher in AL (2.01%) than in SNFs (1.46%) (p < .001). However, after controlling for number of residents, the rate of total ANE complaints per resident was higher (0.019) in SNF compared to AL (0.007) (z = -17.221, p <. 001). The incidence of financial exploitation was significantly higher in AL (23.46%) than in SNF (11.90%) (z = 5.582, p < .001). The percentage of verbal/psychological abuse in SNF (34.78%) was significantly higher than that in AL (23.4%) (z = -2.238, p < .05). Study findings contribute to the knowledge about the prevalence and nature of ANE in long-term care communities and bolster support for increased AL ombudsman presence, staff training, resident-centered care models, and AL oversight.

scholarly journals The Financial and Operational Effects of COVID-19 on Ohio’s Long-Term Care Residential Settings

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 962-962
Author(s):  
Katherine Kennedy ◽  
Robert Applebaum ◽  
Kathryn Brod
Keyword(s):  
Online Survey ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Nursing Facilities ◽  
Financial Loss ◽  
Labor Costs ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Agency Staff ◽  
Skilled Nursing ◽  
Care Facilities

Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic has had a drastic impact on Ohio’s long-term care facilities. Yet, months into the crisis, the financial ramifications and workforce shortage were unknown. In partnership with the Scripps Gerontology Center at Miami University, LeadingAge Ohio and the Ohio Health Care Association developed an online survey that was launched in July 2021. Response rates were 46.4% for skilled nursing facilities (SNFs; N=446) and 35.8% for residential care facilities (RCFs; N=287). Core questions compared the first quarters of 2020 and 2021. Declines in operating revenues (-11.7% SNFs; -10% RCFs) and rising labor costs per patient day (17.9% SNFs; 16.1% RCFs) contributed to most providers experiencing a financial loss in the most recent month (78% SNFs; 66% RCFs). The increased documented use of agency staff is an important finding of this work; 62% of SNFs and 34% of RCFs spent money on agency staff. Despite increases in starting wages, the labor crisis remains severe. As of July 2021, SNFs had an average of 19.51 open positions, of which 9.82 were for state-tested nurse aides and 5.65 were for nurses. RCFs had an average of 8.83 open positions, of which 4.24 were for resident care assistants and 1.89 were for nurses. The challenges faced by the long-term care industry have rightly focused on the deleterious impacts of COVID on residents and staff. But these data also suggest that the financial impacts on the industry are serious and will likely shape access and provision of care in the future.

A Comparison of Wandering Behavior in Nursing Homes and Assisted Living Facilities

2005 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth R. A. Beattie ◽  
JunAh Song ◽  
Shane LaGore
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Assisted Living ◽  
Challenging Behavior ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Assisted Living Facilities ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Training Requirements ◽  
Care Facilities ◽  
Staffing And Training

Wandering, a challenging behavior associated with dementia, affects many residents of long-term care facilities and can result in elopement, injury, and death. Most studies of wandering have taken place in nursing homes (NH). Expansion of the long-term care sector over the last 2 decades has resulted in a surge in options such as assisted living facilities (ALF). This study compared wandering behavior of residents (N = 108) in 21 long-term care facilities (15 NH, 6 ALF). Staff used the Revised Algase Wandering Scale-Nursing Home Version (RAWS-NH) to quantify wandering. While there were some differences in demographic variables (i.e., race, motor ability) between NH and ALF participants, no significant differences were found in either RAWS-NH overall or any of the 6 subscale scores. This suggests that the expression of wandering is similar in long-term care residents across all dimensions of the RAWS-NH regardless of facility type. Findings are of concern for those involved in the safe management and protection of residents at risk for wandering, particularly in long-term care facilities with underregulated staffing and training requirements.

Forensic Issues in Long-Term Care Psychiatry

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marshall B. Kapp
Keyword(s):  
Assisted Living ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Psychiatric Treatment ◽  
Health Assessment ◽  
The United States ◽  
Assisted Living Facilities ◽  
Nursing Facilities ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Term Care

This chapter focuses on medical-legal issues that may arise in the context of identifying psychiatric needs and providing psychiatric care for older persons in long-term care institutional settings, specifically residents of nursing facilities and assisted living facilities. Following general observations about the present regulatory climate in the United States governing nursing facilities and assisted living facilities, the chapter explores mental health assessment requirements for residents of those venues. Key legal responsibilities and restrictions regarding the psychiatric treatment of those residents are then discussed, as well as several areas of concern about potential exposure to litigation and liability on the part of long-term care providers. Finally, some of the most salient future legal and policy challenges confronting those who plan, fund, provide, and evaluate long-term care institutional psychiatric services are noted.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document