The Development and Validation of a Scale to Assess the Emotional and Behavioral Strengths of Children and Adolescents

1999 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 258-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael H. Epstein

Strength-based assessment has received considerable attention from parents and professionals in child welfare, family services, education, mental health, and other social services. The Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale: A Strength-Based Approach to Assessment was developed to provide parents and professionals with a standardized, norm-referenced, reliable, and valid instrument to measure strengths. Several pilot studies were conducted to establish the validity of the scale prior to the scale being normed on a nationally representative sample. The purpose of the present article is to report on these validity studies.

2005 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas W. Farmer ◽  
Jason T. Clemmer ◽  
Man-Chi Leung ◽  
Jennifer B. Goforth ◽  
Jana H. Thompson ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 073428292110384
Author(s):  
Matthew C. Lambert ◽  
Stacy-Ann A. January ◽  
Jorge E. Gonzalez ◽  
Michael H. Epstein ◽  
Jodie Martin

The present study investigated evidence of the construct validity of scores from the Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale (BERS-3), which is a multi-informant assessment designed to measure the behavioral and emotional strengths of school-aged youth. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the degree to which BERS-3 scores differed between students with school-identified emotional disturbance and students without disabilities. Two nationally representative samples were used in this study: (a) 1,575 students rated by teachers and (b) 793 youth who provided self-ratings. The results of multivariate multiple regression analyses supported the primary hypothesis that students with emotional disturbance would have lower scores on each of the five BERS-3 subscale scores compared to peers without disabilities. This finding held for both samples; however, differences between students with emotional disturbance and the peers without disabilities were substantially smaller for the youth self-ratings compared to teacher ratings. Implications for practice and directions for future research are also discussed.


2001 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 314-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael H. Epstein ◽  
Melody A. Hertzog ◽  
Robert Reid

Most assessment is conducted from a deficit perspective and is intended to identify deficits, problems, and pathologies of the individuals who are assessed. However, deficit-based assessment may present a biased picture that limits or ignores a child's strengths. In this article we report data on long-term (6-month) test-retest reliability of the Behavior and Emotional Rating Scale (BERS), which is a strength-based assessment instrument. Participants included 95 randomly selected children from general education classrooms and 26 children identified as having or being at risk for emotional or behavioral disorders. Moderate to high test-retest correlations ranging from .527 to .787 were found across the instrument's subscales. Moreover, the lack of significant differences between ratings indicate that rater drift did not occur. Results suggest that BERS scores are stable over a 6-month time frame. Implications for the use of the BERS are discussed.


2003 ◽  
Vol 96 (2) ◽  
pp. 667-673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Friedman ◽  
Karen A. Friedman ◽  
Virginia Weaver

The study examined consistencies and differences between 60 parents and their adolescent children with behavioral problems when rating the adolescents' strengths. The parents and teenagers agreed on most of the strength categories of the Behavior and Emotional Rating Scale. However, caretakers rated the adolescents as more involved in family life, while the adolescents rated themselves as more involved in school activities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document