Strength-Based Assessment of African-American Adolescents with Behavioral Disorders

2003 ◽  
Vol 96 (2) ◽  
pp. 667-673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Friedman ◽  
Karen A. Friedman ◽  
Virginia Weaver

The study examined consistencies and differences between 60 parents and their adolescent children with behavioral problems when rating the adolescents' strengths. The parents and teenagers agreed on most of the strength categories of the Behavior and Emotional Rating Scale. However, caretakers rated the adolescents as more involved in family life, while the adolescents rated themselves as more involved in school activities.

2005 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas W. Farmer ◽  
Jason T. Clemmer ◽  
Man-Chi Leung ◽  
Jennifer B. Goforth ◽  
Jana H. Thompson ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 123 (3) ◽  
pp. 212-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa M. Dieleman ◽  
Sarah S.W. De Pauw ◽  
Bart Soenens ◽  
Geert Van Hove ◽  
Peter Prinzie

Abstract This study aimed to describe problem behaviors and psychosocial strengths, examine the problem-strength interrelations, and evaluate profiles of problems and strengths in youth with Down syndrome (DS). The community-based sample consisted of 67 parents of children with DS aged between 4 and 19 years. Parents reported about the developmental age (Vineland screener), behavioral problems (Child Behavior Checklist), and psychosocial strengths (Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale) of their child. Results indicate that attention, social, and thought problems were most prevalent, whereas family involvement and receiving/expressing affection were identified as strengths. A confirmatory factor analysis identified problems and strengths as distinct, yet related, variables. Moreover, a cluster analysis of problems and strengths identified four different profiles. Implications for interventions are discussed.


2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 432-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Goldner ◽  
Israel M. Gross ◽  
Maryse H. Richards ◽  
Brian L. Ragsdale

Severity level and type of exposure to community violence were examined to determine their effect on emotional distress and problem behaviors among 234 low-income urban African American early adolescents. There were 4 violence exposure scales developed from a principal component analysis of the Richters and Martinez (1993) exposure to violence scale: moderate and severe witnessing and moderate and severe victimization. Regression analyses indicated that moderate victimization was the most consistent predictor of emotional distress and behavioral problems, whereas moderate witnessing did not relate to any of the dependent variables. Severe victimization predicted depression and delinquency, whereas severe witnessing predicted posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms and delinquency. Witnessing and victimization scales based on severity of exposure better represented the experience than combining all data into a single exposure or simply witnessing and victimization scales.


1999 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 258-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael H. Epstein

Strength-based assessment has received considerable attention from parents and professionals in child welfare, family services, education, mental health, and other social services. The Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale: A Strength-Based Approach to Assessment was developed to provide parents and professionals with a standardized, norm-referenced, reliable, and valid instrument to measure strengths. Several pilot studies were conducted to establish the validity of the scale prior to the scale being normed on a nationally representative sample. The purpose of the present article is to report on these validity studies.


2001 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 314-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael H. Epstein ◽  
Melody A. Hertzog ◽  
Robert Reid

Most assessment is conducted from a deficit perspective and is intended to identify deficits, problems, and pathologies of the individuals who are assessed. However, deficit-based assessment may present a biased picture that limits or ignores a child's strengths. In this article we report data on long-term (6-month) test-retest reliability of the Behavior and Emotional Rating Scale (BERS), which is a strength-based assessment instrument. Participants included 95 randomly selected children from general education classrooms and 26 children identified as having or being at risk for emotional or behavioral disorders. Moderate to high test-retest correlations ranging from .527 to .787 were found across the instrument's subscales. Moreover, the lack of significant differences between ratings indicate that rater drift did not occur. Results suggest that BERS scores are stable over a 6-month time frame. Implications for the use of the BERS are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document